View clinical trials related to Faecal Incontinence.
Filter by:Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an established treatment option for patients with faecal incontinence. The location of the stimulating electrode is considered to be essential for treatment success. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the position of SNM electrodes after using the conventional implantation technique and to compare our results with those of the preliminary study, where the standardised fluoroscopy-guided implantation technique was used. In this cadaver study, SNM electrodes will be implanted bilaterally in 5 lower body specimens. After electrode placement the pelvis was dissected to describe the exact position of the SNM electrodes.
Patients, aged 18 - 90 years, undergoing sphinkeeper operation at the Department of General Surgery at the Medical University of Vienna are enrolled into our study. Primary endpoints is the functional outcome as well as movement, migration and extrusion of sphinkeeper prostheses after implantation by endoluminal ultrasound and manometrical examination.
The purpose of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness and improvement in quality of life of using a novel anal insert (myMiracle)
Patients with sphincter saving procedures of rectal cancer usually experience intestinal dysfunction, including difficulty emptying the bowel and faecal incontinence, leading to a detriment in the quality of life. A prospective study is proposed to measure de feasibility and the impact of a continuous care programme for the prevention or reduction of intestinal dysfunction disorders. The intervention lies on prehabilitation and rehabilitation with physiotherapy, biofeedback and neuromodulation, is assisted by a telematic information system (APP for the monitoring of education on physiotherapy and surveillance).
Urge faecal incontinence (FI) and passive FI are the two subgroups of FI described by the International Continence Society. Urge FI is described as "the inability to defer defecation once the urge is perceived for long enough to reach a toilet" and passive FI as "the involuntary leakage of faeces without forewarning". If several validated questionnaires are available for FI, all of these questionnaires were developed to assess FI severity. In literature, there is only a small number of studies that investigated clinical and paraclinical characteristics of the different phenotype of FI. Moreover, there is an heterogenicity in the definitions used for both urge and passive FI among these studies. Lastly, patients with mixed FI were commonly excluded from these studies. It can be established that there is a lack of validate tools to distinguish patients between subgroups of FI. The aim of the present study was to develop and to validate a new tool in order to investigate and classify patients among the different subgroups of FI (active, passive and mixed) defined by Rome IV criteria. A monocentric prospective study was conducted in the Neuro-urology Department of a University Hospital. All consecutive patients presenting in the Department with FI between December 2019 and June 2020 were screened for inclusion in the present study. Criteria of inclusion were an age older than 18 years old and symptoms of FI according to Rome IV criteria. Exclusion criteria were anorectal fistula, active inflammatory bowel disease, anorectal malignant tumor not treated, rectal or hemorrhoidal prolapses and specific inability regarding the questionnaire (i.e. cognitive disorders, inability to read and to understand questions). Phase 1: review of literature and qualitative interviews: To determine the dimensions of the different subgroups of faecal incontinence, a literature review was performed using Pubmed without date limitation until February 2020. The key words used were "active faecal incontinence", "active fecal incontinence", "passive faecal incontinence", "passive fecal incontinence", "urge faecal incontinence", "urge fecal incontinence", "questionnaire", "scale", "score" and "tool". In parallel to this literature review, semi-structured interviews were performed on 20 patients from December 2019 to February 2020. During this phase, a panel expert of 9 neuro-urologists and gastroenterologists was composed. At the term of all interviews, dimensions that were both the most used by patients and the most discriminative among subgroups of FI were included in the questionnaire. Redaction of questions was then performed by the panel expert. Phase 2: feasibility study: The feasibility study was conducted from February to April 2020 on 30 patients. Each patient was asked to rate each version of the 2 questions with a four-point Likert scale (A: very good, B: good, C: difficult, D: very difficult) regarding acceptance and comprehension of the questions. Phase 3: validation study: To investigate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire, a validation study was performed from April to June 2020 on 100 consecutive patients. In order to evaluate the FITAS' test reproducibility, patients were asked to answer a second time the questionnaire by mail with a second evaluation from 7 days to 10 days after the first one. The "intra-class correlation coefficient" (ICC) was used to determine if these evaluations could lead to similar results for each question. An ICC > 0.70 was necessary to define reproducibility.
Overall Aim: To improve the long-term management outcomes for faecal incontinence (FI); through the implementation of new alternative treatment to complement existing treatment options, and enable better utilization of limited healthcare resources. Primary Specific Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) acupuncture in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Secondary Aims: - To evaluate the safety profile of TCM acupuncture. - To explore the patient satisfaction and uptake of TCM acupuncture as an alternative management strategy for FI. - To evaluate improvements in health-related quality of life with TCM-acupuncture. - To explore the cost-effectiveness of TCM acupuncture. Hypothesis: Traditional Chinese Medicine therapy, in the form of acupuncture, is an effective treatment for faecal incontinence.
The purpose of the study is to directly compare two medical treatments for faecal incontinence: Renew™ Anal Insert and Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) for a period of 12 weeks. Both are routinely used in our practice.
The objective of the study is to determine the incidence of faecal incontinence in prostate cancer survivors treated with moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy and correlate the dose received by the anal sphincter with the degree of faecal incontinence.
The FENIX Registry is a multi-center, observational database designed to collect data regarding the FENIX™ Continence Restoration System in everyday clinical practice, evaluate the clinical course of patients from pre-operative assessment through five years post-surgery and Track and monitor effectiveness and safety through the use of a bowel diary, fecal incontinence quality-of-life measures and adverse event reporting. Up to 25 sites will participate in the Registry. Sites to enroll consecutive eligible patients into the Registry. Registry will enroll approximately 200 FENIX patients.
Faecal incontinence (FI) is the involuntary passage of gas, liquid or solid stool and is experienced by an estimated 1-10% of the population. The symptom is multifactorial and associated with many medical conditions and diseases. The symptom is investigated using structural and functional testing of the pelvic floor. Current investigation techniques have poor correlation between symptom severity and investigation results. These techniques are unable to provide prognostic outcomes, resulting in undirected referrals for treatment based on symptoms alone. This study aims to improve the assessment of FI through additional testing using Multiple Array Probe Leiden (MAPLe). This is a non-invasive medically certified device that detects the electromyography of the pelvic floor, how muscles respond to voluntary nervous stimulus, to identify areas of weakness. The aim of this study is firstly to identify which patient groups benefit from additional testing with MAPLe, and secondly to identify if directed treatment has been achieved. The study will take place across two NHS trusts, both with specialist pelvic floor services. Participants referred to each trust with FI who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be recruited from designated pelvic floor clinics and referrals for anorectal physiology (ARP). Each participant will undergo routine anorectal physiological assessment with Anal Ultrasound (AUS) and High Resolution Anal Manometry (HRAM) and additional assessment with MAPLe. Participation is complete unless treatment has been advised, these participants will undergo repeat assessment with MAPLe at 6 months. Average participation will be 12 months. The results will be analysed to identify non-inferiority of MAPLe vs current techniques using Bland Altman method. Regression and correlation studies will be performed to identify which groups have benefited from assessment with MAPLe. An expert panel of specialists in the field of pelvic floor will be convened to determine the clinical utilisation of MAPLe.