View clinical trials related to Faecal Incontinence.
Filter by:This study aims to obtain finer details of tissues surrounding a lead in the pelvis using a combination of high-resolution anatomical MRI sequences and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). DTI is a non-invasive technique sometimes described as fiber tractography that enables visualization of the pathways and integrity of nerves. In this feasibility study, we plan to use DTI to assess the sacral plexus and its peripheral nerves. A model will be constructed by superimposing SNS lead from a CT scan onto the DTI imaging to map out the electrode position. It is hoped that this study will lead to a better understanding of both therapeutic and adverse stimulation effects and enable patient-specific adjustments of stimulation parameters.
Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is an ambulatory therapy validated for patients with Faecal Incontinence (FI) refractory to conservative treatment with proved short and mid-term efficacy. The investigators therefore aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of PTNS, considered 3 years of follow-up. The investigators also aimed to identify predictors of responses and suggest a new approach for partial responders.
This study assess the effectiveness on AcuTENS on the treatment of faecal incontinence
Faecal incontinence (FI) is characterized by involuntary loss of rectal content through the anal canal. FI is psychologically and socially debilitating problem that can dramatically affect patient's quality of life, often in otherwise healthy individual. FI can occur as a result of obstetric sphincter injury, surgery, irradiation, anorectal malformations as well as neurological, connective tissue or endocrine disorders. Currently management options for these patients are limited, partly due to the fact that control of defaecation and continence is multifactorial but also due to the fact that FI is difficult to identify the exact cause of patients' incontinence. Current assessment of patients with FI include endoscopic assessment to rule out intraluminal organic cause for patients' symptoms, endoanal ultrasound scan / MRI to assess their pelvic floor anatomy and anorectal manometry to assess anorectal function. Anorectal manometry is a simple test to perform but Anorectal manometry is susceptible to measurement artifacts, with a high inter-individual variation with significant overlap between healthy asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with FI. Harris et al in 1966 suggested that the anal sphincter's resistance to distension that may be of importance for sphincter competence, not how tight anal sphincter can squeeze. Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP©) is a novel technology used to measure the dimensions and function of a hollow organ. Limited publication so far has shown that EndoFLIP© provides a new way of assessing anal sphincter competence. The study is to assess the use of EndoFLIP© to assess anal sphincter function in Hong Kong population. Firstly to evaluate whether age has an effect on the distensibility of the anal sphincter and its function and secondly to compare between symptomatic patients with faecal incontinence and asymptomatic healthy subjects.
Patients, aged 18 - 90 years, undergoing sphinkeeper operation at the Department of General Surgery at the Medical University of Vienna are enrolled into our study. Primary endpoints is the functional outcome as well as movement, migration and extrusion of sphinkeeper prostheses after implantation by endoluminal ultrasound and manometrical examination.
Urge faecal incontinence (FI) and passive FI are the two subgroups of FI described by the International Continence Society. Urge FI is described as "the inability to defer defecation once the urge is perceived for long enough to reach a toilet" and passive FI as "the involuntary leakage of faeces without forewarning". If several validated questionnaires are available for FI, all of these questionnaires were developed to assess FI severity. In literature, there is only a small number of studies that investigated clinical and paraclinical characteristics of the different phenotype of FI. Moreover, there is an heterogenicity in the definitions used for both urge and passive FI among these studies. Lastly, patients with mixed FI were commonly excluded from these studies. It can be established that there is a lack of validate tools to distinguish patients between subgroups of FI. The aim of the present study was to develop and to validate a new tool in order to investigate and classify patients among the different subgroups of FI (active, passive and mixed) defined by Rome IV criteria. A monocentric prospective study was conducted in the Neuro-urology Department of a University Hospital. All consecutive patients presenting in the Department with FI between December 2019 and June 2020 were screened for inclusion in the present study. Criteria of inclusion were an age older than 18 years old and symptoms of FI according to Rome IV criteria. Exclusion criteria were anorectal fistula, active inflammatory bowel disease, anorectal malignant tumor not treated, rectal or hemorrhoidal prolapses and specific inability regarding the questionnaire (i.e. cognitive disorders, inability to read and to understand questions). Phase 1: review of literature and qualitative interviews: To determine the dimensions of the different subgroups of faecal incontinence, a literature review was performed using Pubmed without date limitation until February 2020. The key words used were "active faecal incontinence", "active fecal incontinence", "passive faecal incontinence", "passive fecal incontinence", "urge faecal incontinence", "urge fecal incontinence", "questionnaire", "scale", "score" and "tool". In parallel to this literature review, semi-structured interviews were performed on 20 patients from December 2019 to February 2020. During this phase, a panel expert of 9 neuro-urologists and gastroenterologists was composed. At the term of all interviews, dimensions that were both the most used by patients and the most discriminative among subgroups of FI were included in the questionnaire. Redaction of questions was then performed by the panel expert. Phase 2: feasibility study: The feasibility study was conducted from February to April 2020 on 30 patients. Each patient was asked to rate each version of the 2 questions with a four-point Likert scale (A: very good, B: good, C: difficult, D: very difficult) regarding acceptance and comprehension of the questions. Phase 3: validation study: To investigate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire, a validation study was performed from April to June 2020 on 100 consecutive patients. In order to evaluate the FITAS' test reproducibility, patients were asked to answer a second time the questionnaire by mail with a second evaluation from 7 days to 10 days after the first one. The "intra-class correlation coefficient" (ICC) was used to determine if these evaluations could lead to similar results for each question. An ICC > 0.70 was necessary to define reproducibility.
The purpose of the study is to directly compare two medical treatments for faecal incontinence: Renew™ Anal Insert and Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) for a period of 12 weeks. Both are routinely used in our practice.
The FENIX Registry is a multi-center, observational database designed to collect data regarding the FENIX™ Continence Restoration System in everyday clinical practice, evaluate the clinical course of patients from pre-operative assessment through five years post-surgery and Track and monitor effectiveness and safety through the use of a bowel diary, fecal incontinence quality-of-life measures and adverse event reporting. Up to 25 sites will participate in the Registry. Sites to enroll consecutive eligible patients into the Registry. Registry will enroll approximately 200 FENIX patients.
Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has over the last 20 years been recognised as an efficient treatment option for faecal incontinence (FI). In a selected patient group we have evidence that 90% of patients will have a successful test period (≥50% reduction in incontinence episodes). If preoperative there is motor response on at least 3 out of 4 poles on the lead, at a threshold ≤1.5 mAMP. Hypotheses In a selected patient group suffering from faecal incontinence a one-stage permanent implant will be possible. The functional results will be improved as more time can be spent finding the optimal pacemaker settings as the risk of infection is reduced compared to the stage implant. One-Stage implantation gives the opportunity to test the amount of placebo effect with SNS. During the first 3 months postoperative patients will be randomized to either stimulation amplitude set at 90% of sensory threshold (control group) or 3 periods of stimulation at 0.05v (placebo), 50% and 90% of sensory threshold. Patients are randomized in a 1 to 2 pattern. After the initial 3 months the stimulation amplitude is increased to sensory threshold. After six months the project ends and the number of patients achieving the 50% improvement in incontinence episodes are evaluated.
Randomised controlled trial comparing standard outpatient clinic treatment with multi-disciplinary clinic treatment for functional gastrointestinal disorders. Patients will be followed up to end of clinic treatment and 12 months beyond the end of treatment. Symptoms, quality of life, costs to the healthcare system and psychological outcomes will be assessed.