Artificial Intelligence-powered Virtual Assistant for Emergency Triage in

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

This study examines the use of an AI-powered virtual assistant for quickly identifying and handling neurological emergencies, particularly in places with limited medical resources. The research aimed to check if this AI tool is safe and accurate enough to move on to more advanced testing stages. In a first-of-its-kind trial, the virtual assistant was tested with patients having urgent neurological issues. Neurologists first reviewed the AI's recommendations using clinical records and then assessed its performance directly with patients. The findings were as follows: neurologists agreed with the AI's decisions nearly all the time, and the AI outperformed earlier versions of Chat GPT in every tested aspect. Patients and doctors found the AI to be highly effective, rating it as excellent or very good in most cases. This suggests the AI could significantly enhance how quickly and accurately neurological emergencies are dealt with, although further trials are needed before it can be widely used.

Clinical Trial Description

Background and Objectives: Neurological emergencies pose significant challenges in medical care, especially in resource-limited countries. Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly health chatbots, offers a promising solution. However, rigorous validation is required to ensure safety and accuracy. The objective of our work is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and resolution effectiveness of an AI-powered virtual assistant designed for the triage of emergency neurological pathologies, to ensure the minimum standard of safety that allows for the progression to successive validation tests. Methods: This Phase 1 trial evaluates the performance of an AI-powered virtual assistant for emergency neurological triage. Ten patients over 18 years old with urgent neurological pathologies were selected. In the first stage, nine neurologists assessed the safety of the virtual assistant using their clinical records. In the second part, the assistant's accuracy when used by patients was evaluated. Finally, its performance was compared with Chat GPT 3.5 and 4. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT06334796
Study type	Interventional
Source	Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	Early Phase 1
Start date	October 1, 2023
Completion date	January 1, 2024

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT04043052` - Mobile Technologies and Post-stroke Depression	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03869138` - Alternative Therapies for Improving Physical Function in Individuals With Stroke	N/A
Completed	`NCT04101695` - Hemodynamic Response of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Cerebellar Hemisphere in Healthy Subjects	N/A
Completed	`NCT04034069` - Effects of Priming Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial	N/A
Terminated	`NCT03052712` - Validation and Standardization of a Battery Evaluation of the Socio-emotional Functions in Various Neurological Pathologies	N/A
Completed	`NCT00391378` - Cerebral Lesions and Outcome After Cardiac Surgery (CLOCS)	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06204744` - Home-based Arm and Hand Exercise Program for Stroke: A Multisite Trial	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT06043167` - Clinimetric Application of FOUR Scale as in Treatment and Rehabilitation of Patients With Acute Cerebral Injury
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04535479` - Dry Needling for Spasticity in Stroke	N/A
Completed	`NCT03985761` - Utilizing Gaming Mechanics to Optimize Telerehabilitation Adherence in Persons With Stroke	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT00859885` - International PFO Consortium	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06034119` - Effects of Voluntary Adjustments During Walking in Participants Post-stroke	N/A
Completed	`NCT03622411` - Tablet-based Aphasia Therapy in the Chronic Phase	N/A
Completed	`NCT01662960` - Visual Feedback Therapy for Treating Individuals With Hemiparesis Following Stroke	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05854485` - Robot-Aided Assessment and Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity Function After Stroke	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05520528` - Impact of Group Participation on Adults With Aphasia	N/A
Completed	`NCT03366129` - Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in People With White Matter Hyperintensities Who Have Had a Stroke
Completed	`NCT03281590` - Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases Registry
Completed	`NCT05805748` - Serious Game Therapy in Neglect Patients	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05621980` - Finger Movement Training After Stroke	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Artificial Intelligence-powered Virtual Assistant for Emergency Triage in Neurology — AIDEN

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms