Malignant Biliary Obstruction Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of SpyGlass Guided RFA On The Same Stage Versus RFA After Cytobrush for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
With the development of endoscopic technology, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.In patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, cytological brushing performed concurrently with ERCP had a lower pathologically positive rate and increased the times of ERCPs, increased the risk of postoperative complications at the same time.The present study aims to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of Spyglass+RFA Versus Cytobrush+RFA for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been used as the primary method for the diagnosis of biliary strictures and the treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. However, the accurate visual diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures and assessment of the extent of a lesion are not possible by ERCP, and treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by ERCP procedures is sometimes difficult. In patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, cytological brushing performed concurrently with ERCP had a lower pathologically positive rate and increased the times of ERCPs, increased the risk of postoperative complications at the same time. Spyglass enables direct visualization of the biliary tract and the sampling of suspicious lesions, together with radiofrequency ablation.Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an emerging technique for the palliation of inoperable malignant biliary strictures (MBSs). In a dozen published studies, this novel approach has shown better safety and feasibility, as well as improvement in overall survival (OS). The present study aims to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of Spyglass+RFA Versus Cytobrush+RFA for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04941924 -
The ID- RFA Trial: A Trial of Intraductal Radio-frequency Ablation (ID-RFA) Plus Biliary Stenting Versus Biliary Stenting Alone for the Treatment of Malignant Biliary Obstruction.
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03672019 -
A Quality of Life Study in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Biliary Drainage
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05220475 -
A Comparison of a Fully Covered Self-expandable Metal Stent With an External Anchoring Plastic Stent and Uncovered Stent
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02001779 -
IRS(Irradiation Stent) vs. CS(Conventional Stent) Insertion in Inoperable Malignant Biliary Obstruction
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06375928 -
EUS-guided Choledochoduodenostomy vs ERCP as First Line in Malignant Distal Obstruction in Resectable Disease (CARPEDIEM-1 Trial)
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06375954 -
EUS-guided CDS vs ERCP as First Line in Malignant Distal Obstruction in Borderline Disease (CARPEDIEM-2 Trial)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05786326 -
Multihole Fully Covered Metallic Stents in the Management of Malignant Biliary Obstruction
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06375967 -
EUS-Gallbladder vs CDS as First Line in MBDO- Palliative (CARPEGIEM Trial)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01869894 -
A Prospective Randomized Study for Efficacy of Uncovered Double Bare Metallic Stent Compared to Uncovered Single Bare Metallic Stent in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05804201 -
EUS-guided Hepatico-gastrostomy With Hot Giobor
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01686425 -
Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Drainage
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03215108 -
Comparison Between Novel Flower-type Covered Stent and Conventional Covered Stent
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04898777 -
EUS-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy Versus ERCP for Primary Biliary Decompression in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05169398 -
EUS-guided Hepatico-gastrostomy Using a Novel Lumen Apposing Metal Stent
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03812250 -
EUS-guided Biliary Drainage vs. ERCP Assisted Transpapillary Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03000855 -
EUS - Guided Choledocho-duodenostomy Versus ERCP With Covered Metallic Stents in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Distal Common Bile Duct Strictures
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01073514 -
Clinical Trial of Bile Etiology ,Proteomics and Metabonomics of Malignant Biliary Obstruction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05142839 -
Palliation of Gastric Outflow Obstruction in Case of Concomitant Biliary Obstruction.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05729867 -
Efficacy and Safety of a Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent for Unresectable HCC
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04405752 -
Evaluation of a New Metal Biliary Stent of 12-mm Diameter: a Case Control Study
|