Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

EUS - guided choledocho-duodenostomy (ECDS) is an established option for bile duct drainage in unresectable malignant distal CBD strictures when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails. However, how primary ECDS compares with ERCP with covered self-expanding metallic stents (CSEMS) in unresectable malignant distal CBD strictures is uncertain.

The aim of the current study is to compare primary ECDS versus ERCP with CSEMS in unresectable malignant distal CBD strictures. We hypothesis that ECDS is associated with a higher 1-year stent patency rate.


Clinical Trial Description

Malignant biliary obstruction is a common sequela of pancreatic cancers or distal bile duct cancers, and its development can hinder the use of chemotherapy, decrease patient quality of life and decrease survival. Malignant biliary obstruction is traditionally palliated with ERCP with metallic stent insertion. However, these stents are prone to obstruction due to tumour ingrowth. In addition, ERCP may not always be possible due to tumour obstruction and percutaneous biliary drainage may be required.

Recently, ECDS has been described as an alternative to percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with failed ERCP. The procedure is also associated with potential advantages as compared to conventional ERCP. In particular, the risk of tumour ingrowth into the stent placed after ECDS is low and stent patency rates may be better than ERCP. Thus, the aim of the current study is to compare primary ECDS versus ERCP with CSEMS in unresectable malignant distal CBD strictures. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03000855
Study type Interventional
Source Chinese University of Hong Kong
Contact Anthony Teoh, FRCSEd(Gen)
Phone 26322956
Email [email protected]
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 2/Phase 3
Start date December 2016
Completion date December 2020

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT04941924 - The ID- RFA Trial: A Trial of Intraductal Radio-frequency Ablation (ID-RFA) Plus Biliary Stenting Versus Biliary Stenting Alone for the Treatment of Malignant Biliary Obstruction. N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03672019 - A Quality of Life Study in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Biliary Drainage
Completed NCT02001779 - IRS(Irradiation Stent) vs. CS(Conventional Stent) Insertion in Inoperable Malignant Biliary Obstruction N/A
Completed NCT01869894 - A Prospective Randomized Study for Efficacy of Uncovered Double Bare Metallic Stent Compared to Uncovered Single Bare Metallic Stent in Malignant Biliary Obstruction N/A
Recruiting NCT04898777 - EUS-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy Versus ERCP for Primary Biliary Decompression in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction N/A
Recruiting NCT01686425 - Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Drainage N/A
Recruiting NCT03215108 - Comparison Between Novel Flower-type Covered Stent and Conventional Covered Stent N/A
Recruiting NCT03812250 - EUS-guided Biliary Drainage vs. ERCP Assisted Transpapillary Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction N/A
Recruiting NCT01073514 - Clinical Trial of Bile Etiology ,Proteomics and Metabonomics of Malignant Biliary Obstruction N/A
Completed NCT04405752 - Evaluation of a New Metal Biliary Stent of 12-mm Diameter: a Case Control Study