Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

EUS-guided drainages has been largely widespread during the last 10 years, even thanks to the advent of dedicated devices, such as lumen apposing metal stents (LAMSs). Above all, EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CD) is to date considered a valuable option of treatment in case of distal malignant biliary obstruction in case of failure of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) due to the presence of a gastric or duodenal obstruction, unreachable papilla in case of altered anatomy, infiltrated papilla or failure of deep cannulation of the common bile duct. This modality of drainage demonstrated satisfying results, with high rate both of technical and clinical success with acceptable rate of adverse events. When the distal malignant biliary obstruction is associated to signs and symptoms of gastric outflow obstruction (GOO) due to the presence of a gastric or duodenal stenosis, a concomitant or subsequent palliation of the stenosis may be required. Recently, EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GEA) has been introduced for the palliation of GOO, showing good results although technically challenging. To date, endoscopic treatment in case of GOO, enteral stenting and EUS-GEA are possible alternatives. However, available data demonstrated that EUS-GEA seems to be superior to enteral stenting in terms of rate of reinterventions during long-term follow-up, especially when life expectancy is superior to 6 months. However, data are lacking regarding which is the best strategy when GOO is associated to distal malignant biliary obstruction, especially when EUS-CD is performed. This is an hot topic, as it has been supposed that EUS-CD has higher rate of adverse events, especially food impaction, when a duodenal stenosis is present. The aim of our study, therefore, is to perform a retrospective multicenter study collecting all consecutive patients affect by distal malignant biliary obstruction drained using EUS-CD, with associated GOO treated with concomitant or subsequent duodenal stenting or EUS-GEA, in order to evaluate clinical efficacy, long term outcomes and severity of adverse events.


Clinical Trial Description

n/a


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05142839
Study type Interventional
Source Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Contact Andrea Anderloni, MD
Phone 0039-02-82247308
Email andrea.anderloni@humanitas.it
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date December 15, 2021
Completion date September 30, 2022

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04941924 - The ID- RFA Trial: A Trial of Intraductal Radio-frequency Ablation (ID-RFA) Plus Biliary Stenting Versus Biliary Stenting Alone for the Treatment of Malignant Biliary Obstruction. N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03672019 - A Quality of Life Study in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Biliary Drainage
Recruiting NCT05220475 - A Comparison of a Fully Covered Self-expandable Metal Stent With an External Anchoring Plastic Stent and Uncovered Stent N/A
Completed NCT02001779 - IRS(Irradiation Stent) vs. CS(Conventional Stent) Insertion in Inoperable Malignant Biliary Obstruction N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06375954 - EUS-guided CDS vs ERCP as First Line in Malignant Distal Obstruction in Borderline Disease (CARPEDIEM-2 Trial) N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06375928 - EUS-guided Choledochoduodenostomy vs ERCP as First Line in Malignant Distal Obstruction in Resectable Disease (CARPEDIEM-1 Trial) N/A
Recruiting NCT05786326 - Multihole Fully Covered Metallic Stents in the Management of Malignant Biliary Obstruction N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06375967 - EUS-Gallbladder vs CDS as First Line in MBDO- Palliative (CARPEGIEM Trial) N/A
Completed NCT01869894 - A Prospective Randomized Study for Efficacy of Uncovered Double Bare Metallic Stent Compared to Uncovered Single Bare Metallic Stent in Malignant Biliary Obstruction N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05804201 - EUS-guided Hepatico-gastrostomy With Hot Giobor N/A
Recruiting NCT01686425 - Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Drainage N/A
Recruiting NCT03215108 - Comparison Between Novel Flower-type Covered Stent and Conventional Covered Stent N/A
Recruiting NCT04898777 - EUS-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy Versus ERCP for Primary Biliary Decompression in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction N/A
Recruiting NCT05169398 - EUS-guided Hepatico-gastrostomy Using a Novel Lumen Apposing Metal Stent N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05233293 - Spyglass+RFA Versus Cytobrush+RFA for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma N/A
Completed NCT03812250 - EUS-guided Biliary Drainage vs. ERCP Assisted Transpapillary Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction N/A
Completed NCT03000855 - EUS - Guided Choledocho-duodenostomy Versus ERCP With Covered Metallic Stents in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Distal Common Bile Duct Strictures Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT01073514 - Clinical Trial of Bile Etiology ,Proteomics and Metabonomics of Malignant Biliary Obstruction N/A
Recruiting NCT05729867 - Efficacy and Safety of a Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent for Unresectable HCC N/A
Completed NCT04405752 - Evaluation of a New Metal Biliary Stent of 12-mm Diameter: a Case Control Study