View clinical trials related to End Stage Renal Disease.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to characterize the quality of life change in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to end-stage renal failure.
At times patients with advanced renal failure present with severe hyperkalemia or acidosis and very high serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentrations. These patients cannot be dialyzed aggressively as the lowering of serum BUN may results in disequilibrium syndrome but on the other hand they need aggressive dialysis in order to lower their serum potassium or fix their severe acidosis. If one is able to add urea to the dialysis fluid, one can prevent the rapid lowering of serum BUN and osmolality at the same time as doing aggressive dialysis to lower serum potassium and/or fix the metabolic acidosis.
The goal of this observational study is to investigate and compare the prevalence of forward head , hyper kyphosis and balance in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. The main questions it mains to answer are: What is the prevalence of forward head posture in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients? What is the prevalence of hyper kyphosis in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients? Is there any relation between postural abnormalities and physical function in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients? Participants will answer 2 questionnaires and will do some functional tests.
The SODIAH study is designed with the aim to assess the impact of isonatremic dialysis on interdialytic weight gain, fluid status, intradialytic hemodynamic stability, and incidence of intradialytic morbid events in dialysis patients. The study will be comparing the Na management option on the 6008 HD dialysis machines with the same machine without the Na management option turned on. Relevant performance and clinical data will be collected as well as information on patients' quality of life and wellbeing.
A prospective, single arm, non-randomized feasibility study to confirm the safety and performance of the Xeltis Hemodialysis Access conduit, aXess-E, in subjects older than 18 years with end-stage renal disease, who plan to undergo hemodialysis for at least the first 6 months after study access creation.
The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate the effect of 5 different dialysis treatments (combinations of dialysis mode and dialysis fluid sodium content) on the microcirculation (MC) and sequestered sodium content (SSC) in adult prevalent end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients treated with hemodialysis (HD) or hemodiafiltration (HDF). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What are the effects on the sequestered sodium content and microcirculation after 4 weeks of treatment with the following dialysis modes? - HDF with an expected zero diffusive sodium balance (Dialysate sodium concentration (DNa)= Plasma sodium concentration (PNa)) compared to - HDF with an expected diffusive sodium efflux (DNa < PNa, difference 3 mmol/L) compared to - HD with an expected zero diffusive sodium balance (DNa = PNa) compared to - HD with an expected diffusive sodium efflux (DNa < PNa, difference 3 mmol/L) compared to - Isolated ultrafiltration for 30 minutes followed by HD with an expected zero diffusive sodium balance (DNa = PNa) 2. Are the SSC and MC interrelated in this patient group? This study is a randomized cross-over trial. Participants will be subjected to the abovementioned dialysis treatment modes in random order.
The purpose of this mixed methods study is to adapt CAPABLE as CAPABLE Transplant to accomplish two things: 1) To resolve barriers to being classified as active on the Kidney Transplant (KT) waitlist and 2) as a surgical prehabilitation intervention targeting the pre-frail/ frail KT waitlist population. It consists of two phases- an open label pilot and a randomized waitlist control trial.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test light therapy in patients with end stage kidney disease who are receiving hemodialysis. The main aim is to determine if light therapy decreases fatigue severity. Participants will receive light therapy using special glasses for one hour during the dialysis sessions for four weeks of treatment.
In France, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) affects almost 170 people per million inhabitants every year, and 92,500 people are treated by dialysis or kidney transplantation (0.14% of the French population). The treatment of chronic renal failure is extremely costly: 4 billion euros in 2021, i.e. 2% of health insurance expenditure, and an annual cost of 42,000 euros per patient. The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of dialysis patients is low, with reports of patients at 40%-60% of full health. In France, there has been a significant decrease in physical (-15.4 points) and mental (-6.9 points) component scores compared with the general population. Dialysis patients often present severe or overwhelming symptoms, which contribute to this poor HRQoL. However, in nephrology, studies have focused on survival and laboratory biomarkers, and very few interventions have been aimed at improving what was a priority for patients, i.e. treating their symptoms and improving their HRQoL. Opportunities to intervene and improve symptom management and overall HRQoL may therefore have been missed. Ignoring patients' symptoms is an important omission. Of 28 randomized trials in primary care and oncology that measured the impact of communicating patient-reported outcomes to clinicians, 65% showed improved care processes and 47% improved health outcomes. The results of two recent randomized trials in oncology suggest that symptom monitoring can improve HRQoL and overall survival. There is no evidence for dialysis patients, although therapeutic solutions are available in most cases. Nephrology teams do not sufficiently recognize the prevalence, severity and negative effects of symptoms in their patients, and patients under-report their symptoms. With systematic symptom screening and automatic transmission of symptoms in the form of alerts, dialysis staff will be able to react and implement routine management to alleviate patients' symptoms. The F-SWIFT study evaluates the hypothesis that regular symptom monitoring and feedback to hemodialysis patients and their dialysis staff improves patient HRQoL at 18 months. In addition, the trial aims to determine whether electronic capture of patient-reported outcomes within a national dialysis patient registry is feasible and cost-effective, evaluated using consumption data from the Système National des données de Santé (SNDS) medico-administrative database. F-SWIFT is the French part of an international project (SWIFT) initiated in Australia in 2021: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry #ACTRN12620001061921. This French part is funded by Inserm's AAP MESSIDORE 2022. F-SWIFT is also the continuation of the pilot study n° 2021-A00776-35 accepted by the CPP EST II on 19/10/2021 and financed by the Agence de la Biomédecine (AOR 2021) in the RIPH3 category.
Intermittent hemodialysis is a complex technique which requires careful monitoring of anticoagulation levels to prevent clotting and reduce the risk of bleeding complications. Dialysis patients often exhibit hypercoagulable tendencies due to uremic state, turbulent blood flows in dialysis procedures, and thrombogenic exposure to artificial surfaces of dialysis tubing. Patients with ESRD may experience both dialyzer clotting and excessive bleeding, so individualized heparin dosing and periodic adjustments are necessary to ensure adequate anticoagulation during hemodialysis. The ideal anticoagulant should prevent thrombosis while minimizing the risk of intra- and interdialytic bleeding. The use of heparin carries risks such as worsening of osteoporosis and dyslipidemia, allergic reactions like pruritus, and the potential for life-threatening heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) for which avoidance of heparin is necessary during dialysis.Heparin, in both its unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) forms, is the most commonly used anticoagulant, though evidence comparing their efficacy and risk of bleeding remains inconclusive. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, who are already at higher risk of serious bleeding, may benefit from regional anticoagulation (RA) techniques, as they typically receive around 600,000 IU of heparin per year. The investigators performed routinely a simplified regional anticoagulation procedure (RAP) using a constant calcium re-injection rate over the time to avoid hypocalcemia. This procedure eliminates the need for citrate infusion and calcium monitoring, and reduces nurse workload in a chronic dialysis unit. The investigators compared 21 chronic dialysis patients with 198 RA and 195 heparin sessions, where each patient acted as their own control. None of them were on VKA during the RA sessions, 62% were on single anti-platelet therapy and 14% were on dual anti-platelet therapy. The dialysis session success rate was 94% in the RA group and 97% in the heparin group, with no significant differences (p=0.22). The circuit loss rate was 1.5% per RA session and 0.5% per heparin session (p=0.23), and the early blood restitution rate was 3% and 1.5% (p=0.50) in the RA and heparin groups, respectively Hypothesis: RAP can be as effective as systemic anticoagulation with heparin for intermittent dialysis in chronic hemodialysis patients, with the potential to reduce the rate of hemorrhagic events