View clinical trials related to End Stage Renal Disease.
Filter by:The most common forms of renal replacement therapy currently in use are high flux haemodialysis (HF-HD) and haemodiafiltration (HDF). Although these techniques appear similar to the patient, there are important differences in what happens to the blood as it travels through the dialysis machine. During HDF, the machine controls hydrostatic pressure across the dialyser to remove additional water together with toxins from the blood and this fluid volume is continually replaced with an ultra-pure solution. HDF has a theoretical advantage removing more waste substances, especially larger molecules, from the blood than HF-HD which may be of benefit to the patient in the medium to long term.Despite the theoretical advantages, trials have so far been unable to find any significant difference in death rates or the development of health problems among patients on HDF or HF-HD. It is therefore important to examine other factors which may help doctors and patients to decide which treatment to use. The investigators have designed a study which aims to answer three main questions: 1. Does HDF make patients feel better? 2. Is blood pressure more stable on HDF in comparison with HF-HD? 3. Are Phosphate levels and other blood parameters better controlled with HDF than HF-HD? The investigators will do this by randomly assigning patients on HF-HD to receive 2 months of either HF-HD or HDF with as equivalent treatment prescriptions as possible and without the patient knowing which treatment they are receiving. After two months the patients will switch to the alternative form of dialysis for a further two months. During the study the investigators will ask the patients how long it took them to recover from the preceding session of dialysis, assess the frequency of symptomatic low blood pressure and also perform blood tests at set intervals to measure specific blood parameters.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of decreasing fluid overload by hemodialysis on the severity of obstructive sleep apnea, in patients with end stage chronic kidney disease on intermittent hemodialysis. It aims further to investigate the relationship between overhydration, nocturnal rostral fluid shift and the severity of sleep apnea.
Cardiovascular disease is the primary cause of death in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). New research suggests that the high risk of death may be partly due to high levels of fibrosis and a loss of small blood vessels in the heart of patients with dialysis-dependent ESRD. This study is designed to compare the effects of two different drugs, spironolactone and L-arginine, with placebo on structure and function of the heart in individuals with dialysis-dependent ESRD.
Poor nutritional status as evidenced by low body mass index, low muscle mass or low serum albumin is a strong predictor of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Hypercatabolism induced by inflammation is widely considered the cause of uremic malnutrition even though there is no clear evidence that hemodialysis patients with elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are at greater risk of losing weight or muscle mass. Conversely, there is little data on whether dialysis patients with malnutrition and elevated C-reactive protein levels would gain muscle mass with protein supplementation. The hypothesis is that protein supplementation during dialysis will improve muscle mass, functional status and quality of life in inflamed malnourished hemodialysis patients. Therefore, the objectives of the current proposal are to examine in malnourished (body mass index < 23 kg/m2 or serum creatinine < 8 mg/dL) hemodialysis patients with inflammation (high sensitivity CRP > 3 mg/dL), the effects of protein supplementation on 1. Muscle mass as determined by creatinine kinetics 2. Functional status as assessed by 6 min walk 3. Quality of life as assessed by Short Form -12 survey
Compared to chronic dialysis, kidney transplantation provides recipients with longer survival and better quality of life at a lower cost. In order to meet increasing demands for kidney allografts, kidneys from older and sicker donors are being procured. This has led to greater discard rates of donated kidneys as well as more complications for recipients, including shorter allograft survival. Available clinical models to predict kidney allograft quality have poor prognostic ability and do not asses the degree of kidney allograft injury. However, allograft injury near the time of procurement can lead to major consequences for the transplant recipient: greater risks of delayed graft function, poor allograft function and premature loss of the transplant. Our proposal is based on the hypotheses that novel biomarkers measured in donor urine and transport media at the time of procurement can assess acute and chronic kidney injury and that distinct biomarker patterns will predict allograft survival. In collaboration with five organ procurement organizations, we will collect urine samples from consecutive deceased donors and samples of transport solution for every pumped kidney. We will measure markers of injury, repair, inflammation and fibrosis. We will determine mortality and allograft survival in all patients by linkage to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database (Overall Cohort). Additionally, we will perform a detailed chart review of a subset of recipients (detailed cohort) and will also examine associations between biomarkers and longitudinal graft function over five years after transplant. Early, non-invasive and rapid assessment of donor kidney injury could drive better allocation decisions and potentially reduce the rates of post-transplant complications. Further, these new tools could provide a platform for clinical trials of therapies for allografts and kidney transplant recipients aimed at ameliorating allograft injury.
HDQ 200 is an interventional multicenter study. This is a before-and-after design in which the patient is his own control. The main objective of the study is to determine the percentage of success of a procedure of daily hemodialysis at low dialysate flow. All patients treated with conventional hemodialysis, for at least 3 months and clinically stable, can be included in the study. Their 3 months data prior to inclusion is collected retrospectively. These 3 months of conventional hemodialysis are the reference period. Patients are then treated with daily hemodialysis at low dialysate flow for 3 months. During this 3 months period, the same data as during the period of conventional hemodialysis are collected prospectively.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of a novel, tissue-engineered vascular prosthesis, the Human Acellular Vascular Graft, HAVG. The HAVG is intended as an alternative to synthetic materials and to autologous grafts in the creation of vascular access for dialysis.
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of 6 months of daily beta-hydroxy beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation on the physical function and the health of bones, arteries and heart in hemodialysis patients.
Highlighting the relationship between psychological and physical profiles and patient's preference to better understand the patient's treatment preference and improve the information provided.
Patients often begin dialysis taking diuretics (stimulate the kidney to excrete salt and water). Once on dialysis, these drugs are often continued. Whether these drugs are still needed, or even effective is often unclear.This study,by evaluating the composition of the patients' urine when off the drug, will predict which patients should benefit from the drug. By comparing their 24 hour volume both off and on the drug, the impact of the drug will be established. The results will allow the prediction of which patients, in the future, should take the drug. The hypothesis is: Among dialysis recipients, evaluation of the random urine sodium concentration will help predict the likelihood of a positive response to Furosemide, as manifested by an increased urine volume and sodium excretion.