View clinical trials related to Esophageal Motility Disorders.
Filter by:A retrospective and prospective cohort, quantitative data collection with the goal of comparing preoperative High Resolution Manometry(HRM) results to Upper Gastrointestinal Marshmallow(UGI MM) results, in patients undergoing preoperative esophageal motility assessments. The aim of this study is to establish a correlation between HRM and UGI MM in order to create a clinically supported gold standard measurement for preoperative esophageal motility assessment.
This is prospective data recording study. All patients will receive standard medical care and no experimental interventions will be performed.
rapid swallow (MRS) can assess the contractile reserve capacity of the oesophageal body and identify and diagnose oesophageal motility disorders, but the impact of preoperative oesophageal reserve capacity on postoperative symptoms and motility in patients with GERD remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of pre-operative oesophageal reserve capacity on post-reflux symptoms and motility in patients with GERD by using a high-resolution oesophageal manometry-based provocation test, MRS, to track pre-operative ineffective oesophageal motility (IEM).
This is a combined retro- and prospective, monocentric study. All patients who underwent or are planned for laparoscopic partial fundoplication (180° anterior or 270° posterior) between 2020-2023 are assessed for preoperative ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). The main hypothesis is, that preoperative oesophageal motility disorders, especially hypo-contractility or failed peristalsis, are caused by gastro-oesophageal reflux. Therefore, postoperative manometry after partial wrap fundoplication (270° posterior, 180° anterior) shows a decrease in comparison to preoperative motility disorders. The primary objective of this study is to examine the postoperative esophageal motility in patients with known preoperative motility disorders. Secondary endpoints are the presence of other oesophageal motility disorders pre- vs. postoperatively (including new onset disorders), the assessment of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) pre- vs. postoperatively, and more. If IEM is present preoperatively, patients are contacted at least 1 year after surgery and will be informed about the study and asked to participate. In case of agreement, they are invited to the study site. They undergo high-resolution manometry 18-24 months postoperatively (study intervention).
This study compares the clinical efficacy of safety of circular myotomy and full-thickness myotomy guided by peroral endoscopic in treatment of incision length of ≤7cm and of ≥7cm in achalasia patients.
Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder, which leads to clinical symptoms such as dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain and consecutive weight loss. Although conventional treatment such as laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and balloon dilatation (BD) can provide sufficient symptom relief in many patients, both interventions have their individual drawbacks. Additionally, treatment after failed LHM or BD can be challenging and in few might even lead to esophagectomy. Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and prolonged dilatation (PRD) are two novel endoscopically performed therapeutic options for achalasia and other esophageal motility disorders. Both not only appear to provide good results, when performed as initial treatment but also might be an excellent option after e.g failed LHM. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of four different treatment options, such as POEM, PRD with stent-fixation, PD and conventional LHM for achalasia in an individualized treatment setting.
Spastic esophageal motility disorders induced significant symptoms including dysphagia, retrosternal pain and regurgitation. Per oral endoscopic myotomy (P.O.E.M.) is a novel approach to perform myotomy through the esophagus with long submucosal tunnel. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of P.O.E.M. and translate the techniques from animal study to clinical practice in human.
rimary spastic esophageal motility disorders, though uncommon, induce significant symptoms to patients including dysphagia, spastic chest pain, regurgitation as well as heartburn. The commonest causes of spastic esophageal motility disorders included Achalasia, hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES), Nutcracker esophagus and Diffuse esophageal spasm (DES). Majority of these diseases were diagnosed by manometry. Achalasia is the most common primary esophageal motility disorder in which the LES failed to relax with increased pressure. Currently the standard treatment for Achalasia and spastic motility disorders is Laparoscopic Myotomy. The development of Natural Orifices Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (N.O.T.E.S.) has lead to a new way to perform myotomy - Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (P.O.E.M.). Basically, through mucosal incision, a submucosal tunnel is created after identification of the level of gastroesophageal junction. Myotomy will be performed with endoscopic instruments and the entrance site will be closed with clips.
The aim of this study is to evaluate standard investigations performed in patients with bolus impaction in a prospective observational field study. In bolus impaction, ingested food boluses have to be endoscopically removed. Oesophageal narrowing by scar tissue caused by reflux disease or motility disorders are possible causes of bolus impaction. How common these causes are has up to date never been investigated. The discovery of eosinophilic oesophagitis has broadened differential diagnosis of bolus impaction. Currently high resolution oesophageal manometry and 24-hour pHmetry are performed in addition to endoscopy in the assessment of bolus impaction at the University Hospital Zurich. The collection of these examination results is the aim of this prospective unrandomised observational field study to assess weather the currently applied procedures are valid to diagnose the cause of impaction to find optimal therapy for each patient.
This study evaluates the effect of botulinum toxin 100 U or saline, injected endoscopically in the distal esophagus, on symptoms and manometry pattern in patients with diffuse esophageal spasm.