View clinical trials related to Esophageal Cancer.
Filter by:The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of S-588210 (S-488210+S-488211) in patients with unresectable recurrent and/or metastatic solid tumors.
A randomized control trial to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a patient educational platform (PEP) for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies undergoing active chemotherapy treatment.
The aim of this study is to reduce pathologic aspiration and pneumonia in the perioperative period by providing an oral care and oral hygiene education to patients preoperatively. Patients enrolled in the study will be given a dysphagia screening questionnaire, an oral care package and oral hygiene education. Patients who screen positive for dysphagia will be referred to Speech Pathology for evaluation. The rate of postoperative pneumonia will be determined for those who participate in the study and will be compared to retrospective patient data from our institution.
This is a retrospective case series of a novel fully minimally invasive esophagectomy procedure for patients with primary esophageal cancer.
This phase II clinical study is designed to evaluate the 1 year local tumor control rates after the targeted therapy of intensity-modulated radiation therapy synchronized chemotherapy with nimotuzumab combined with S-1 in local advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinomas based on Nutritional Risk Screening NRS2002.
Surveillance and early detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with minimally-invasive Cytosponge™ cell collection device coupled with molecular biomarkers.
The purpose of the study is to test 18F-BMS-986229 positron emission tomography (PET) imaging a practical and safe way to check the status of esophageal, stomach, and gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Rationale: Anastomotic leakage (0% - 30%) is a severe complication after esophagectomy with mortality rates approximately ranging from 2% - 12%. In addition, it is associated with a prolonged ICU treatment and hospital stay. Anastomotic leakage severity is currently graded according to how it is treated (grade I: conservative treatment, grade II endoscopic or radiologic intervention and grade III surgical intervention). However, this scoring system cannot be used to guide decision making when anastomotic leakage is diagnosed in a clinical setting. Factors that may influence the severity of the anastomotic leakage are (amongst others) location of the anastomosis, estimated surface of the defect, estimated circumference of the defect, extent of contamination, degree of sepsis and time from diagnosis until therapy. However, little is known about to what extent these and other factors contribute to anastomotic leakage severity. In addition, there is a paucity of data on what leakage characteristics dictate the success of a specific treatment. Primary study objectives 1. To investigate what factors contribute to anastomotic leakage severity and to compose an evidence based anastomotic leakage severity score. 2. To investigate what anastomotic leakage characteristics are associated with success of different anastomotic leakage treatments and to compare the effectiveness of different initial anastomotic leakage treatments for leakages classified according to severity and leakage characteristics. Study design: International multicenter retrospective cohort study. Study population: Adult patients with anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction for esophageal cancer. Cohort size: 1000-2000 patients with anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer. Primary outcome parameter: 90 day mortality. Secondary outcome parameters: in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, 180-day mortality, comprehensive complications index, total number of reinterventions, hospital and ICU length of stay, hospital related costs. Funding: Radboudumc
This is a prospective study that uses the treatment guideline of our chest surgery ICU. Investigators recruited 90 patients who underwent MIE in the National Taiwan University Hospital. The clinical data collected included vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory patterns and frequencies, saturation of blood oxygen and carbon dioxide, etc.), blood tests, images and bronchoscopic analysis of sputum. The goal of this study is to analyze common care problems and complications patients may encounter during the acute stage in ICU after MIE. By comparing the differences between the treatment group and the control group, investigators can interpret the role of HFNC.
The purpose of this study is to decrease the rate of visits to the Emergency Department (ED) and Acute Care Clinics (ACC) for dehydration for head & neck (H&N) and esophageal cancer patients that are given Gatorade while receiving radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy.