View clinical trials related to Erector Spinae Plane Block.
Filter by:Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women. Modified radical mastectomy, a surgical procedure in the treatment of breast cancer, is one of the standard treatments. Postoperative pain can seriously reduce the quality of life in patients, and inadequately treated acute pain can trigger chronic pain syndrome. Therefore, thoracic paravertebral block and thoracic epidural block are effective in postoperative analgesia. However, the use of these blocks is limited due to complications. In recent years, less invasive blocks, such as pectoral nerve block (PECS I-II), Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), Erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and Serratus Posterior Superior intercostal Plane Block (SPSİPB) have been applied. In this study, it was aimed to compare the analgesic effectiveness of ESPB and SPSİPB applications in patients undergoing breast surgery.
The epidemic of overweight and obesity presents a major challenge to chronic disease prevention and health across the life course around the world. [1] Bariatric surgery has proved to be an efficient intervention in the management of obesity. As a result, the number of post-bariatric surgery patients in the population is growing [2]. Postoperative analgesia presents various challenges in vulnerable patient groups suffering from obesity. With the high potential risk of respiratory depression and postoperative pulmonary complications associated with opioid use, such as atelectasis and pneumonia, the availability of other pain management modalities is essential [14]. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a regional anesthesia technique where local anesthetic agent is injected deep to the erector spinae muscle to fascial plane and allowed to diffuse caudally and cranially. It is supposed to provide both visceral and somatic abdominal analgesia [3]. ESPB is effective, easy to perform, and can be performed in a short time. [4] It has been shown efficacy in different conditions such as thoracic surgery, trauma, cardiac surgery, breast surgery, and abdominal surgery [5]. However, the main concern with the ESPB block is feasibility together with the potency of the block in challenging populations, such as patients suffering from obesity. Peripheral nerve blocks in the obese may pose challenges, like difficulties in proper patient positioning and landmark identification. However, Ultrasound guidance may help overcome many difficulties in regional techniques. But as expected, targets are more deeply situated in obese patients and the ultrasound beams are attenuated as they travel a greater distance through tissue layers. Additionally, when crossing a tissue boundary, a portion is reflected back to the transducer creating artifacts like speckling and clutter which are particular problems in the obese patient. [15] Few studies examined the use of ESPB in bariatric surgery [3,6,7], all indicating potential benefits of the technique in terms of opioid sparing and pain control. To date, the efficacy of ESPB has not been examined in superobese patient. So we aim to compare the perioperative analgesic effect of bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB with controls, Local bupivacaine infiltration to the trocar sites, in super obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery We hypothesis that ESBP provides good applicable modality of perioperative analgesia for superobese patients undergoing bariatric surgeries.
In recent years, regional anesthesia techniques have also been frequently applied to patients for pain relief. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB), is among the regional anesthesia techniques frequently used in lumbar spine surgery. General anesthesia (GA) is the main method of anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery. However, GA can only inhibit the projection system of the cortical limbic system or hypothalamic cortex. GA cannot completely block the transmission of peripheral noxious stimulus to the central nervous system and cannot effectively inhibit the intraoperative stress response. With the addition of peripheral blocks such as ESPB, lower remifentanil consumption, and more stable hemodynamics are expected by providing preemptive analgesia in patients. As a result of all these; it was aimed to compare the intraoperative remifentanil consumption of patients who underwent preoperative ESPB in patients who will undergo lumbar spine surgery resection under GA with those who underwent postoperative ESPB.
In recent years, obesity has become one of the leading health problems worldwide. It is known that obesity can cause various diseases and negatively impact the quality of life. Therefore, many conditions believed to be affected by obesity and relevant to patients' quality of life have been scientifically investigated and continue to be researched. One of these conditions is postoperative pain, with studies in the literature indicating that postoperative pain levels increase in parallel with each unit increase in BMI. The incidence of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is on the rise and adversely affecting the quality of life. The primary surgical intervention for LDH is discectomy. In recent years, various less invasive techniques, such as microdiscectomy, have been described to improve both surgical and analgesic outcomes. However, even with microdiscectomy surgery, postoperative pain may occur, and its control should be well-managed. Inadequate pain control can lead to unwanted effects of postoperative pain. Regional analgesia techniques may be preferred for effective analgesic treatment after spinal surgery. Methods such as paravertebral block, erector spinae plane block (ESPB), thoracolumbar interfascial plane block are widely used for analgesia in spinal surgery. The effectiveness of these regional techniques may vary depending on various factors, one of which is BMI. The hypothesis in this study is that as BMI increases, the level of pain in patients may also increase. As a result, this study aims to investigate the relationship between BMI and postoperative pain levels in patients undergoing standard LDH surgery, anesthesia, and analgesia.
Effect of perineurial dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine on erector spinal plane block duration for spine surgery.
The aim of this study is to compare the incentive spirometry volume and analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided continuous Retrolaminar block and continuous Erector spinae plain block in patients with multiple rib fractures.
The aim of the study is to assess the effect of adding dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in US guided erector spinae plane block in modified radical mastectomy surgeries , Using visual analogue score and post-operative narcotics consumption. Peripheral nerve blocks are effective adjuvant options for pain management in breast surgeries. The use of Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been proven to be very effective in controlling pain and minimizing narcotic consumption after modified radical mastectomy surgeries. Many adjuvants to local anaesthetics were used to improve the duration and intensity of the peripheral nerve block.
Patients, older than 50 years, with vertebral fracture scheduled for percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty will be enrolled for the study. Some patients will be under local anesthesia with sedation and analgesia for the procedure. Some patients will be performed erector spinae plane block with the guidance of ultrasonography for the procedure. The investigators aim to evaluate the intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirement of patients. Surgeon's and patients' satisfaction will be also evaluated.
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of ESPB versus ISB in anesthesia for shoulder arthroscopy
Postoperative acute and chronic pain is frequently observed in patients undergoing video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This prolongs the discharge time of patients and increases the frequency of postoperative pulmonary complications. Recently, alternative analgesic methods such as thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) which are thought to have less side effects than thoracic epidural analgesia, have been used. Among these methods, ultrasound (US) guided TPVB is the most preferred method. In addition, ESPB and SAPB application is increasing in patients undergoing VATS. In the literature, the number of cases performed with ESPB and SAPB and randomized controlled prospective studies with ESPB and SAPB are increasing. In this study, it is planned to compare the effects of US-guided SAPB and ESPB on postoperative acute and chronic pain in patients undergoing VATS.