View clinical trials related to Epistaxis.
Filter by:This study is for patients with recurrent epistaxis (nosebleeds) as a result of Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT). The aim is to determine if ranibizumab, topically applied will diminish epistaxis in patients with HHT as measured by the HHT Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS), hematocrit, and hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels.
This is a research study to find out more about the use of Avastin (proper chemical name is bevacizumab) in the treatment of epistaxis (nose bleeding) in patients with Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT).
Terence M. Davidson, MD is conducting a research study to find out more about the topical application of Avastin (proper chemical name is bevacizumab) in the treatment of epistaxis (nose bleeding) in patients with Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT).
In a case series intranasal submucosal bevacizumab has been shown to reduce epistaxis in patients suffering from Hereditary Haemorrhagic Telangiectasia together with KTP Laser therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of submucosal intranasal bevacizumab compared to placebo in a randomized double blind trial setting.
Effectiveness of Floseal for the treatment of posterior epistaxis.
This is a blind trial to test if Surgiflo is effective in posterior epistaxis. After the investigators see than anterior tamponade is not effective stopping epistaxis, the investigators try using Surgiflo and if it does not work the investigators continue with a nasal catheter. This is the usual way to stop nasal bleeding, but is painful and has serious after-effects in the nose. Surgiflo is a hemostatic matrix that can be put into the nose, painlessly and easily. So the investigators think it can be useful controlling nasal bleeding, so the investigators could avoid to put nasal catheters in these patients.
Purpose: This study is a prospective clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of a chitosan-coated nasal packing (ChitoFlex® used in conjunction with the HemCon Nasal Plug) in the management of difficult spontaneous epistaxis and to evaluate its healing effect on nasal mucosa. The introduction of products that enhances hemostasis can have clinical advantages when associated with traditional nasal packing. These advantages include a better hemostatic control and the reduction of nasal packing duration. Furthermore, this study will help determine if there are any non-desirable effects that chitosan may have on the nasal cavity, such as the production of fibrosis and foreign body reaction.
Epistaxis is a common problem among people of all ages and backgrounds. However, occasionally epistaxis can be severe enough to require emergency room admission. Among the treatment options for epistaxis, nasal packing is the most common approach. This approach requires a return visit to the clinic for removal of the packing. Additionally, there is a great deal of pain during the insertion and removal of this packing. This study aims to justify the further investigation of thrombin as a potential treatment approach for these patients. Thrombin could provide a treatment approach that reduces pain and eliminates the need for a return visit to the clinic.
Chronic sinusitis is a very common problem. The functional endoscopic sinus surgery is a prevalent option to treat this disease.During usage of different techniques of surgery, the need for packing after surgery is debatable problem. So to solve this problem this research has been designed.
Epistaxis is a common disorder with 60% of the population suffering from one episode and 10% of these cases requiring medical attention. Between March 2006 and March 2007, in Calgary, Alberta, there were 1500 presentations of epistaxis to adult emergency rooms with 7% of these (105 patients) requiring packing with admission. Common methods to control epistaxis include, nasal packing (88%), operative arterial ligation (10%), and arterial embolization (2%). A cost analysis demonstrated that nasal packing had a lower cost compared to embolization and arterial ligation, and all modalities had similar lengths of stay (Goddard, Otolaryng Head Neck Surg. 2006). Arterial ligation is the current recommended therapy for recurrent or refractory epistaxis, with a success rate of 98%. With the advancement of endoscopic techniques, emergency room Minimally Invasive Control of Epistaxis (M.I.C.E.) allows for selective packing and cauterization, which provides the patient with retained function of their nasal cavity and prevents a hospital admission, resulting in significant cost savings. Hypothesis: Does the M.I.C.E. procedure provide significant cost savings compared to operative sphenopalatine artery ligation? Null hypothesis is that there is no difference in hospital admission rates between M.I.C.E. and operative sphenopalatine artery ligation.