View clinical trials related to Emergencies.
Filter by:The proposed Study validates the accuracy of the modified Confusion Assessment Method for the Emergency Department
This is a observational prospective study. For patients presenting to the Emergency Department with loss of consciousness, emergency physicians will be asked to screen the real syncope without an evident and immediate cause for the loss of consciousness (e.g. vasovagal) and/or at least one high risk condition as listed by the European Society of Cardiology in the 2009 Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (i.e. severe structural or coronary artery disease, clinical or ECG features suggesting arrhythmic syncope, and important co-morbidities). In case of a real syncope not clearly physiopathologically explained and no high risk conditions, the emergency physician in charge will check risk factors for high risk syncope and categorize again every cases. A high risk syncope is characterized by at least one high-risk characteristic (based on 2015 "Syncope clinical management in the emergency department consensus"): syncope during exertion, in supine position, with new onset of chest discomfort, palpitations before the loss of consciousness, family history of sudden death, congestive heart failure, aortic stenosis, left ventricular outflow tract disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, previously documented ventricular arrhythmia, coronary artery disease, congenital heart disease, previous myocardial infarction, pulmonary hypertension, previous ICD implantation, anemia (i.e. Hb <9 g/dl), lowest systolic blood pressure in the ED <90 mmHg, sinus bradycardia (<40 bpm), new (or previously unknown) left bundle branch block, bifascicular block plus a first degree AV block, Brugada ECG pattern, ECG changes consistent with acute ischemia, a new non-sinus rhythm, bifascicular block, and a prolonged QTc (>450 ms). Low and intermediate risk syncopes will be enrolled and evaluated using an integrated point-of-care sonographic approach (based on history, physical exam, electrocardiogram, and lung, focus cardiac and venous compression ultrasonography). After discharge, the risk of patient's syncope will be determined by reviewing the entire medical records.
This study aims to establish clinical evidence for the use of scoop stretchers in the sports setting for spinal immobilisation and transport compared to the traditionally used long back boards through measuring tissue interface pressures over forty five minutes. All participants will be placed on both the scoop stretcher and the long back board for forty five minutes each, with at least 45 minutes between the two tests. A special mat that measures the pressure of the body against the board will be used to determine the pressure forces at certain points of the body touching the board (in mmHg). The participants will also be asked every five minutes during the experiment to rate the comfort of the device. Pressure measures from each participant on each board will be collated and assessed along with each participant's reported pain scores and comfort rating. The measurements from the tissue pressures will be analysed in real-time from the software connected to the pressure-mat and therefore show if pressures increase over time. A comparison between boards will be made.
This study will compare the efficacy of isopropyl alcohol and conventional anti-emetics with three study arms: (1) inhaled isopropyl alcohol plus oral ondansetron; (2) inhaled isopropyl alcohol plus oral placebo; (3) inhaled placebo plus oral ondansetron.
In the US, children from minority ethnic and racial backgrounds suffer disproportionately from asthma and account for substantially more emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations than non-minority children. While NHLBI guidelines recommend daily preventive medications for all children with persistent asthma to prevent morbidity as well as ED visits and hospitalizations, many children who should receive preventive medications are not receiving them. This is in part because children presenting to the ED for an acute asthma exacerbation rarely receive preventive asthma care, due to the ED's focus on acute, episodic care. The NHLBI guidelines recommend that children follow-up with a primary care provider (PCP) within 1-4 weeks of the ED visit. The post-ED follow-up visit is an opportunity for the PCP to prescribe effective preventive asthma medications, step-up medication for children who demonstrate poor control, promote adherence, and provide education on asthma self-management and trigger control. However, rates for follow-up after an asthma-related ED visit are extremely low, and preventive care is delivered inconsistently even when children are seen in follow-up. In the investigators' prior work they have found that a provider prompting intervention can enhance the delivery of guideline-based preventive asthma treatments at the time of a primary care office visit and ultimately reduce morbidity. They have also found that telemedicine can link children with persistent asthma to a provider for optimal chronic illness management. The goal of this project is to use a novel telemedicine-based program to facilitate primary care follow-up and promote the delivery of guideline-based preventive care for high-risk children presenting to the ED for an asthma exacerbation. The investigators will utilize a 2-group randomized trial to test the TEAM-ED intervention. The intervention includes: 1) a telemedicine assessment at the child's school within one week of discharge from the ED and completed by a PCP, 2) 'point-of-care' prompting to promote the provision of guideline-based preventive care during the telemedicine visit, and 3) two additional telemedicine-assisted follow-up assessments to assure optimal response to treatment and tailor the care regimen as needed. The investigators will assess the effectiveness of the program in reducing respiratory morbidity and improving preventive asthma care, with follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
The purpose of this trial is to determine whether setting up a follow-up appointment for patients who received treatment and were discharged from the emergency department increases their compliance with the follow-up appointment. We are enrolling patients who need a follow-up visit, have health insurance but report do not have a primary care doctor. Patients are randomized to one of three treatment groups: (1) assistance setting up a follow-up appointment by a research assistant using ZocDoc; (2) ZocDoc information given to the subject to set up follow-up appointment by him/herself; or (3) usual discharge instructions by ED staff. Subjects are phoned approximately 2 weeks after the ED visit and asked whether they completed a follow-up visit, satisfaction with their ED visit, satisfaction with their follow-up visit, and additional ED treatment and recovery.
Sepsis is a serious systemic disease defined as a combination of Systemic Inflammation Response Syndrome (SIRS) plus a confirmed or suspected infection. Untreated or inadequately treated cases can lead to severe sepsis or septic shock; being characterized by high mortality and morbidity. Symptoms and signs of sepsis are variable and this makes clinical recognition and assessment very difficult in particular on Emergency Department (ED) patients due to their infectious illness background and the frequent comorbidities. Also, the severity of the condition may not be apparent at initial contact with ED personnel: patients may arrive at ED with mild clinical manifestation and rapidly progress to critical illness, or rather at the opposite others have benign evolution despite a similar symptoms. In these conditions, the main challenge of ED clinicians is differentiating mild infections from life-threatening ones in the heavy workload of ED environment Objective of TRIAGE project is to identify and validate biomarkers able to predict the clinical worsening of patients freshly admitted at Emergency Department. Targeted population is adult patients freshly admitted at ED, whom blood samples will serve to validate candidate markers.
Investigators aim to evaluate the SEPSIS 3 criterion for "sepsis" and "septic shock" in a prospective manner. Investigators will evaluate qSOFA performances and other SEPSIS 3 criterion in a population of emergency patients with infection
To determine the impact, if any the application of oxygen during the apnea period of rapid sequence intubation has on patients being intubated in the emergency department.
The number of elderly patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) is dramatically increasing.