View clinical trials related to Emergencies.
Filter by:This study assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of using Mixed Reality (MR) through the use of HoloLens2TM technology to enhance emergency clinical care delivery in a simulated environment. This was achieved by inviting 22 resident grade doctors to complete two scenarios. Each scenario was supported either by standard care methods or Mixed reality. The participants were randomised to at the start of the scenarios to determine which support they would receive first. The main outcome was to see if there was difference in error rates. This was assessed using the ICECAP multidimensional error capture tool. Secondary outcomes included teamwork, scenario completion, stress/cognitive load, and Mixed reality device user acceptability.
The goal of this research is to increase influenza vaccine acceptance and uptake in vulnerable populations whose primary (and often only) health care access occurs in emergency departments (ED Usual Source of Care Patients). Toward this goal, the investigators will conduct one on one interviews and focus groups with ED Usual Source of Care Patients and community partners and produce trusted messaging informational platforms (PROmotion of FLU VA(X)ccination in the Emergency Department - PROFLUVAXED) that will address barriers to flu vaccination, especially vaccine hesitancy. The investigators will then conduct a cluster-randomized, controlled trial of PROFLUVAXED platforms in six EDs to determine whether their implementation is associated with greater flu vaccine acceptance and uptake in ED Usual Source of Care Patients.
The objective of this study is to determine the follow-up of patients who were referred by the Emergency Call Center of the Haut-Rhin department to an Unscheduled Care Centers (UCC) and to determine whether they actuallly went to a UCC following their call, or if they were taken in charge by another care facility.
Retrospective, multicenter, French cohort study. Data from patients over 75 years of age who visited the emergency department on 12 and 13 December 2022 could be collected until their discharge from hospital and for a maximum of 30 days. Data from patients who spent the night on a stretcher (stretcher group) as well as from a group of patients who spent the night in a bed (hospital bed group) after a visit to the emergency department will be collected. The characteristics of the patients and their stay in the emergency room will be collected, and their hospital stay (truncated at 30 days) will be analyzed in terms of morbidity and mortality. Main objective: To study the truncated 30-day in-hospital mortality of patients who spent a night on a stretcher in the emergency department. Secondary objectives: To describe the characteristics and hospital stay of patients who spent a night on a stretcher To compare the morbidity and mortality of patients who spent the night on a stretcher with patients who spent the night in an inpatient bed after an emergency visit;
A retrospective cohort study to explore the impact of the FIFA World Cup 2022 Qatar on paediatric emergency department attendance at two tertiary centres during unprecedent winter viral epidemics.
Fever is a frequent cause of admission to the Emergency Department (ED) around the world. While it can be caused by a wide range of conditions, the most effective treatment based on its etiology is still undetermined. This observational, prospective, single-center study enrolled adult patients who accessed the ED for fever, with the aim to define the most effective treatment for them.
The study will involve all adult patients visiting the Alexandria University main hospitals' Emergency department for reasons other than trauma that will require assisted ventilation via endotracheal intubation. Those pre-intubated or intubated post CPR will not be included. The main aim is to evaluate the clinical outcome (complications) of emergency endotracheal intubation and to correlate the incidence and nature of complications associated with tracheal intubations to demographic data and patient characteristics.
The aim of the study is to carry out an inventory of practices relating to the management of pain: its recognition, assessment and treatment.
Decreasing utilization of the Emergency Department (ED) is a priority for the system. Often, ED visits can be avoided if patients contact Geisinger first to get appropriate direction for their concern or are otherwise better informed about reasons to visit the ED vs. urgent care or primary care facilities. The study team is working to reduce ED utilization by including additional information in adult outpatient After Visit Summaries (AVSs). The study will involve will involve A/B testing different AVS versions, including 1) a version that encourages patients to contact Geisinger via different contact methods, 2) a version that includes a map to the patient's closest ConvenientCare location and accompanying information about ConvenientCare, and 3) a version that includes a self-triage guide. A control group will receive the current standard AVS. Analysis results will be assessed to determine which version is most effective at reducing ED use.
Background: Despite the capability of emergency surgery to reduce the mortality of severe spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (SSICH) patients, the effect and safety of surgical treatment for severe spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (SSICH) patients receiving long-term oral antiplatelet treatment (LOAPT) remains unclear. In consideration of this, the cohort study is aimed at figuring out the effect and safety of emergency surgery for SSICH patients on LOAPT. Methods: As a multicenter and prospective cohort study, it will be conducted across 7 representative clinical centers. Starting in September 2019, the observation is scheduled to be completed by December 2022, with a total of 450 SSIC H patients recruited. The information on clinical, radiological, and laboratory practices will be recorded objectively. All of the patients will be monitored until death or 6 months after the occurrence of primary hemorrhage. Results: In this study, two comparative cohorts and an observational cohort will be set up. The primary outcome is the effect of emergency surgery, which is subject to assessment using the total mortality and comparison in the survival rate of SSICH patients on LOAPT between surgical treatment and conservative treatment. The second outcome is the safety of surgery, with the postoperative hemorrhagic complication which is compared between the operated SSICH patients on and not on LOAPT. Based on the observation of the characteristics and outcome of SSICH patients on LOAPT, the ischemic events after discontinuing LOAPT will be further addressed, and the coagulation function assessment system for operated SSICH patients on LOAPT will be established. Conclusions: In this study, we will investigate the effect and safety of emergency surgery for SSICH patients on LOAPT, which will provide an evidence for management in the future.