View clinical trials related to Emergencies.
Filter by:Retrospective, multicenter, French cohort study. Data from patients over 75 years of age who visited the emergency department on 12 and 13 December 2022 could be collected until their discharge from hospital and for a maximum of 30 days. Data from patients who spent the night on a stretcher (stretcher group) as well as from a group of patients who spent the night in a bed (hospital bed group) after a visit to the emergency department will be collected. The characteristics of the patients and their stay in the emergency room will be collected, and their hospital stay (truncated at 30 days) will be analyzed in terms of morbidity and mortality. Main objective: To study the truncated 30-day in-hospital mortality of patients who spent a night on a stretcher in the emergency department. Secondary objectives: To describe the characteristics and hospital stay of patients who spent a night on a stretcher To compare the morbidity and mortality of patients who spent the night on a stretcher with patients who spent the night in an inpatient bed after an emergency visit;
The goal of this observational study is to compare clinical utility between Remote EEG Monitoring (REMI) and conventional EEG in patients (6 and older) that are undergoing EEG recording in a hospital as part of their routine clinical care. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - What is the concurrence of diagnosis made by epileptologist using REMI and full-EEG signals. - What is the proportion of participants experiencing as seizure at the time of sensor placement, compared between REMI sensor placement and full-EEG placement. Participants will wear REMI and conventional EEG electrodes at the same time.
A retrospective cohort study to explore the impact of the FIFA World Cup 2022 Qatar on paediatric emergency department attendance at two tertiary centres during unprecedent winter viral epidemics.
Elderly adults have high rates of emergency department (ED) visits. Specificities of this population challenge organizations of care in the ED, and older adults are at risk of pejorative outcomes after an ED stay. Numerous interventions have been designed to improve quality of care and outcomes for the older population in these settings, with a specific attention to concerning discharge from the ED. These interventions are interdisciplinary, bridging emergency and geriatric care. The wide range and complexity of these interventions make them difficult to assess and compare, as highlighted by several reviews in the past ten years. Prior analyses helped to categorize different intervention strategies and three main designs: inhospital, community and transitional interventions started in the ED and pursued in collaboration with community primary care professionals . Theses analyses show that the use of multiple strategies and transitional models of care tend to lead to better outcomes, and underline that more robust studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. In France a majority of EDs collaborate with Geriatric Mobile Teams (GMT) to improve quality of care for older patients. GMTs are dedicated to patients over 75 years old, and interventions in EDs are targeted on patients at risk of worse outcome. When ED physicians detect older patients at risk they may call for the GMT for further assessment and management. GMTs either work in a inhospital standard approach or with a transitional care management. This second strategy, less common in France, is thought to be be efficient and has never been assessed. We have designed a study to compare these methods, with the hypothesis that among at-risk older adults, hospital-community transition care initiated by GMTs during an ED visit with direct discharge home will be associated with a reduction in the risk of early readmission within 30 days, and lower risk of loss of independence at 3 and 6 months. It is a french multicentric study, with a quasi-experimental design, comparing hospitals without transitional care management to hospitals with hospital-community transitional intervention. We aim at enrolling 1322 patients aged 75 and more at risk of pejorative outcomes as determined by the Triage Risk Screening Toll (TRST). The main outcome is a revisit to the ED between day 7 and day 30, secondary outcomes are autonomy, mortality, use of hospital services and caregiving at home at 6 months.
Fever is a frequent cause of admission to the Emergency Department (ED) around the world. While it can be caused by a wide range of conditions, the most effective treatment based on its etiology is still undetermined. This observational, prospective, single-center study enrolled adult patients who accessed the ED for fever, with the aim to define the most effective treatment for them.
This study will be conducted in the Regional Emergency Room (ER) of the Dijon-Bourgogne University Hospital in Dijon, France. It is an interventional study that will have an impact on medical contact time. Patients will be identified among adult patients presenting to the ER of the Dijon University Hospital. Each patient will be followed-up for 30 days from the time of arrival at the ER (if the inclusion criteria for the study are met). A total of 337 patients will participate in this study and will be randomly allocated to 3 groups: - Group 1 "controls - FRENCH grid only": patients will receive the same care and management as any other patient admitted for the same condition. Management is based on the use of the FRENCH grid only. - Group 2 "FRENCH grid + QuickSOFA": In addition to the standard use of the FRENCH grid, a quick score called QuickSOFA is added. It consists in performing an evaluation based on 3 clinical criteria (blood pressure, respiratory rate and consciousness) to quickly establish a severity score. - Group 3 "FRENCH grid + QuickSOFA + Capillary lactate": In addition to the use of the FRENCH grid and the QuickSOFA score, capillary lactate concentrations will be measured. This involves taking a drop of blood from the fingertip (less than 1ml). For diabetic patients, there will be no second sampling act, everything will be done from the same sample. All samples will be discarded after the result is displayed on the reader. This study includes 2 visits: - D0 (adult ER visit): The patient's background, clinical and biological data will be collected. The patient will then be randomized into one of three groups. Depending on the group assigned, the triage nurse may perform QuickSOFA and lactate assessments. - Follow-up at D30: collection of follow-up information up to 30 days after inclusion in the emergency department: replacement therapy (mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation,…), dates of discharge from critical care and hospital, vital status and in case of death the date of its occurrence.
The purpose of the research is to see if patients that come to the Emergency Department with chest pain can be more accurately and more quickly diagnosed by magnetocardiography (MCG) to see if their chest pain is caused by coronary ischemia (reduced blood flow to the heart) in patients with normal or have non-specific changes on the ECG vs other causes by other reasons.
This prospective randomized study will assess an emergency department (ED) based prevention strategy in geriatric patients at high risk for recurrent falls and injury. Falling is a major health hazard in older adults with a number of proposed but unproven protocols to prevent fall-related injuries. This study proposes to study one of these strategies, the CDC's Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths and Injuries program (the STEADI Program).
The study will involve all adult patients visiting the Alexandria University main hospitals' Emergency department for reasons other than trauma that will require assisted ventilation via endotracheal intubation. Those pre-intubated or intubated post CPR will not be included. The main aim is to evaluate the clinical outcome (complications) of emergency endotracheal intubation and to correlate the incidence and nature of complications associated with tracheal intubations to demographic data and patient characteristics.
Patient perceived quality of recovery is an important outcome after surgery and should be measured in clinical trials. The QoR-15 was designed to measure quality of recovery postoperatively. It provided an efficient evaluation of the postoperative quality of recovery. The primary objectives of this study is validate the Turkish version of QoR-15 questionnaire for emergency laparotomy. The investigators will test its validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical acceptability and feasibility, with patients emergency laparotomy, in the University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Education and Training Hospital Ankara, Türkiye.