Clinical Trials Logo

Education, Medical clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Education, Medical.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01972698 Recruiting - Education, Medical Clinical Trials

Focused Cardiac and Lung Ultrasound in Anesthesia/Critical Care - The Role of Self-directed Simulation-assisted Training Compared to a Traditional Supervised Approach

Start date: November 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a self-directed and simulation-based lung ultrasound (LUS) and focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) curriculum is efficacious on anesthesia trainees' image acquisition skills and diagnostic acumen. The investigators hypothesize that a self-directed and ultrasound-assisted LUS and FCU curriculum that includes video lectures, online teaching modules, an ultrasound simulator, and self-directed hands-on sessions on critically ill mechanically ventilated patients is effective in training novice ultrasonographers to obtain good quality images, to correctly interpret them, and to support clinical decision-making in critically ill patients. Trainees will be randomized to fully supervised FCU hands-on sessions on healthy models and critically ill mechanically ventilated patients (control group - traditional apprenticeship model) or to a completely self-directed and simulation-based approach (intervention group). To assess if this new self-directed and simulation-based ultrasound curriculum leads to adequate acquisition of competences (adequate image acquisition and interpretation) in novice ultrasonographers, trainees will have to perform a focused lung and cardiac assessment on a critically ill mechanically ventilated patient.

NCT ID: NCT01286025 Completed - Education, Medical Clinical Trials

Comparing the Effect of Video-cases and Text-cases on Medical Students' Learning in Tutorial

Start date: February 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is designed to examine how the type of learning case affects the thinking of medical students in tutorial

NCT ID: NCT01146691 Completed - Critical Illness Clinical Trials

Effect of Around the Clock Intensivist Coverage on Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Outcomes

Start date: October 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Intensive Care Units (ICU) are an important, but troubled, part of modern health care systems. While it seems likely that both the technical and structural elements of ICU care are important determinants of relevant ICU outcomes, little is known about how the structure of ICU care affects outcomes. One element of potential importance is the way that ICU physicians (intensivists) organize themselves to provide ICU care, particularly at night. The dominant, historical ("standard") model of intensivist staffing involves an intensivist who is present during daytime hours, but then takes "call" at night from home. But, in recent years there has been widespread concern about whether patients experience adverse events or worse outcomes related to a lesser level of expertise and care readily available at night in hospitals. Only two studies, both from single ICUs, and both using simple before vs. after study designs, have conducted interventional studies directly comparing a "standard" intensivist staffing model with a "24-7" model of nighttime intensivist coverage via shift work, i.e. with the daytime intensivist giving way at the late afternoon to a nightshift intensivist who remained in the hospital and covered the ICU until morning. Those two studies found contradictory effects of the intervention. But despite the absence of clear data indicating a benefit to ICU patients associated with having intensivists remain in the hospital overnight, there has been a major movement around the world towards ICU staffing models utilizing shift work to ensure such coverage. The potential impact of such a change in staffing paradigm is large, with possible effects on all the other major stakeholders involved in ICU care: families, nurses, and house officers. Both benefits and detriments are possible. On the one hand, moving to a shift work model from a model in which a single intensivist becomes overworked and sleep-deprived as a result of being responsible for care both day and night, has the potential to reduce the sleep deprivation, job distress, and burnout prevalent among intensivists with standard staffing models. But, it would also require more intensivists, a serious challenge given the worsening intensivist manpower shortage. Also, there are many detrimental effects of shift work on humans, including negative effects on motor function, cognition, sleep, job satisfaction, mood, errors, and cardiovascular health. Shift work is the most common reason that Emergency Medicine physicians give for leaving that field. The physical availability of an intensivist around-the-clock might also influence the problems mentioned of family dissatisfaction with communication in ICUs, and poor communication/ teamwork with physicians often perceived by ICU nurses. In ICUs of teaching hospitals, where relatively inexperienced house officers typically remain in the ICU overnight, the nighttime presence of an attending physician might influence residents' perceptions of domains such as teaching, and clinical autonomy. This purpose of this study is to rigorously compare the effects of two different intensivist staffing models, specifically the current standard model, and a 24-7 staffing model enabled via shift work. This study will be conducted in two ICUs, one academic with house officers who remain in ICU overnight (the Medical ICU at Health Sciences Center), and one in a community hospital which currently lacks overnight, in-ICU physicians (the Victoria General Hospital). This study is designed to improve upon both prior studies. To obviate the problems with using historical controls inherent in those before-vs-after study designs, our study will alternate the two staffing models (e.g. A-B-A-B). Also, the investigators will rigorously assess the effect of 24 hour intensivist presence on all major stakeholders, i.e. patients, families, intensivists, nurses, and house officers.

NCT ID: NCT00465361 Completed - Child Development Clinical Trials

Resident Surveillance of Pediatric Patient Developmental Status at the Two Month Preventive Care Visit

Start date: May 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of individualized performance feedback coupled with an educational module in improving resident performance of the physical and developmental examination component of developmental surveillance of infants at the two month preventive care visit.

NCT ID: NCT00399984 Completed - Asthma Clinical Trials

Evaluating a Pediatric Asthma Management Education Program for Physicians

Start date: April 2004
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Inhaled corticosteroids taken on a daily basis have been proven to be the most effective treatment for children with persistent asthma. However, many pediatricians still do not prescribe daily corticosteroids to their asthmatic patients; this can lead to poor health outcomes among asthmatic children. This study will evaluate an interactive medical education program that focuses on improving pediatricians' asthma management skills and on encouraging increased corticosteroid use among their patients with asthma.

NCT ID: NCT00318279 Completed - Education, Medical Clinical Trials

Evaluation of Surgical Simulator for Practicing a Vascular Anastomosis

Start date: May 2006
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To determine if practicing an aorto-saphenous vein anastomosis on a low-fidelity surgical simulator allows trainees to produce a higher quality anastomosis in a shorter period of time, than a group that only learns by watching a video.

NCT ID: NCT00302783 Completed - Communication Clinical Trials

Randomized Controlled Trial of Multi-Source Feedback to Pediatric Residents

Start date: June 2004
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to test whether multi-source feedback, including self-assessment and tailored coaching, improves resident communication skills and professionalism. We hypothesize that residents who are assigned to receive multi-source feedback, in addition to receiving standard feedback, will improve significantly more than residents receiving standard feedback alone, as measured by parent and nurse ratings of specific behaviors over time.