View clinical trials related to Dyslipidemia.
Filter by:This study will assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of AZD0780 following single and multiple dose administration to healthy subjects with or without elevated Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. This study will consist of two parts (Parts A and B). 56 subjects have been planned for Part A and 141 subjects for Part B. Additional subjects may be included for the optional cohorts depending upon emerging data.
This study will investigate the efficacy and safety based on the observation of the blood cholesterol change with Mevalotin® Tablet administration in Korean menopausal women aged 50 years or more who require treatment of dyslipidemia.
This Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QuERI) is a knowledge translation medical practice activity based on decision making support through feedback to physicians on their management of dyslipidemia in order to achieve guidelines recommended LDL-C levels in high risk patients. Physician interaction has three distinct components: 1. Capture of data as reported by participating physician; 2. Highlight (by providing feedback) where management may be optimized based on guidelines or recommendations; 3. Identify challenges faced by physicians resulting in the care gap..
The overall objective of the proposed cluster randomized trial is to test whether implementation of protocol-based integrated care will improve CVD risk factors (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1C], systolic blood pressure [SBP], and LDL-cholesterol) over 18 months and reduce major CVD events (non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, hospitalized heart failure, and CVD mortality) over 3 years among patients with type 2 diabetes and additional CVD risk factors or clinical CVD compared to usual team-based care in community clinics in Xiamen, China.
Fructose-containing sugars have been implicated in the epidemics of obesity, diabetes and related cardiometabolic disorders. This view is supported by lower quality evidence from ecological observations, animal models, and select human trials. Higher level evidence from controlled trials and prospective cohort studies have been inconclusive. Whether sugars contribute to cardiometabolic complications independent of their calories remains unclear. To address the uncertainties, the investigators propose to conduct a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the totality of the evidence from controlled trials to distinguish the contribution of fructose-containing sugars from that of energy in the development of markers of cardiometabolic risk. The findings generated by this proposed knowledge synthesis will help improve the health of consumers through informing evidence-based guidelines and improving health outcomes by educating healthcare providers and patients, stimulating industry innovation, and guiding future research design.
The rise in high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) consumption over the past 40 years since its introduction as a popular sweetener in the United States has led to much concern regarding its contribution to the rise in obesity (1), diabetes (2) and related cardiometabolic disorders (3).Unlike sucrose which contains equal proportions of fructose and glucose bound by an α-glycosidic bond, HFCS contains 42-55% of fructose to glucose in a free (unbound) form (4). Despite these differences in composition, both sugars possess identical energy contribution on a gram to gram basis (4). However, the higher ratio of fructose to glucose in HFCS has led to the hypothesis that HFCS may uniquely contribute to cardiometabolic risk, more so than sucrose, through proposed differences in fructose metabolism, endocrine and hedonic properties (5). We will conduct a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to assess the role of HFCS versus sucrose under energy matched (isocaloric) conditions on cardiometabolic risk.
Legumes are generally recognized as healthy dietary components, and although beans and legumes are recommended in food guidelines in North America, guidelines vary in regards to how much and how often these foods should be consumed. Furthermore, although North American and European guidelines recommend dietary pulses for glycemic control, dietary pulses and other legumes are not specifically suggested for controlling blood pressure and maintaining heart health. To improve evidence-based guidance for legume recommendations, the investigators propose to conduct a systematic review of clinical studies to assess the effect of eating legumes in exchange for other foods on blood pressure in humans. The systematic review process allows the combining of the results from many small studies in order to arrive at a pooled estimate, similar to a weighted average, of the true effect. The investigators will be able to explore whether eating legumes has different effects in different demographics, and whether or not the effect of legumes depends on how much/often they are eaten. The findings of this proposed knowledge synthesis will help improve the health of Canadians through informing recommendations for the general public, as well as those at risk of heart disease and diabetes.
The overall goal of the present project is to contribute to new knowledge about the effect of a low threshold population screening system for cardiovascular risk factors in Norway. Further, this project aim to study if identifying high cardiovascular risk itself may lead to beneficial changes in health behaviors such as physical activity, diet, tobacco and alcohol behavior together with reduced risk score of cardiovascular disease, across socioeconomic status. This fall, a nationwide, free screening of cardiovascular risk factors will be conducted in 150 pharmacies in Norway. All participants that consent to participate will measure full lipid-profile, blood pressure, HbA1c, body weight and height by health care providers in pharmacies. Based on their measurement levels, participants will be stratified into either a low or a high risk group. In the high risk group, participants will further be randomized to either the intervention group or one of the two control groups. Participants in the intervention group will be informed about all their measurement levels with comparison to the recommended levels. Contrary, participants randomized to the two control groups will have delayed information of their measured levels. Participants in the intervention group and the first control groups will receive general oral and written information about how to lower their measurement levels in 8 weeks. In the second control group, participants will not receive any information at the first visit. In this way the investigators may be able to isolate the effect of identifying high risk and high levels of the risk factors itself. All groups will be given a diet- and physical activity questionnaire at visit 1, and will be invited back after 8 weeks to once more perform the measurement screening and receive the same questionnaire. At visit 2, all participants will, after the measurement screening, be informed about their measured risk factors and receive information on how to lower their levels. 1 year after inclusion, all participants in the three groups will be invited back for a one-year follow up visit in pharmacy.
Vegetarian diets have been associated with a reduced risk of preventable diseases such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. These effects may be mediated through direct or indirect pathways. Although the high intakes of nuts, legumes, dietary fibre, whole grains, and unsaturated plant oils have each individually been associated with lower risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, so too has the displacement of red meats, processed meats, and saturated animal fats. One of the most important considerations in moving from animal-based diets to more plant-based diets is the replacement of animal proteins (e.g. meat, fish, dairy, eggs) with vegetable proteins (e.g. legumes, nuts, and seeds). It is unclear whether this particular replacement alone results in advantages for metabolic and cardiovascular health. To improve evidence-based guidance for dietary guidelines and health claims development, we propose to conduct a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the effect of plant-based protein in exchange for animal protein on blood lipids, glycemic control, blood pressure, body weight, uric acid, markers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and kidney function and injury. The systematic review process allows the combining of the results from many small studies in order to arrive at a pooled estimate, similar to a weighted average, of the true effect. The investigators will be able to explore whether the effects of replacing animal-based protein for plant-based protein hold true across different sexes, age groups, and background disease states and whether the effect depends on the protein source, dose, or background diet. The findings of this proposed knowledge synthesis will help improve the health of Canadians through informing recommendations for the general public, as well as those at risk of heart disease and diabetes.
Since uncontrolled observational studies first linked fructose to the epidemic of obesity almost a decade ago, it has become a focus of intense concern regarding its role in the obesity epidemic and increasing burden of cardiometabolic disease. Despite the uncertainties in the evidence, international health organizations have cautioned against moderate to high intakes fructose-containing sugars, especially those from sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs). To improve the evidence on which nutrition recommendations are based, the investigators propose to study of the role of fructose-containing sugars in the development of overweight/obesity, diabetes, hypertension, gout, and cardiovascular disease, by undertaking a series of systematic syntheses of the available prospective cohort studies. Prospective cohort studies have the advantage of relating "real world" intakes of sugars to clinically meaningful disease endpoints over long durations of follow-up. The findings generated by this proposed knowledge synthesis will help improve the health of consumers through informing recommendations for the general public, as well as those at risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease.