View clinical trials related to Dry Eye Syndromes.
Filter by:The objective is to compare the USL and placebo in terms of efficacy and safety, and to determine the appropriate dosage.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of topical spironolactone ophthalmic solution, 0.005 mg/cc in subjects with dry eye disease compared to placebo. The hypothesis for this study is that topical spironolactone ophthalmic solution will be beneficial in the management of signs and symptoms of dry eye disease when compared to placebo.
This study assesses the impact of two differing ocular hygiene regimens prior to cataract surgery. The first regimen includes an omega-3 supplement and the second without, and both include an at-home lid wipe and cleansing eye drops. These regimens will be assessed on microbial load, inflammation, tear osmolarity, and dry eye metrics. Patients will be randomized to either the omega-3 group + 3-part hygiene regimen, or the group with only the 3-part hygiene regimen. Data will be collected for inflammation through a test (InflammaDry) that measures an inflammatory marker, dry eye metrics via an imaging tool called Oculus 5M and the Canadian Dry Eye Assessment (CDEA) questionnaire, tear osmolarity through Tear Labs device, and area of growth for conjunctiva microbial load by swabbing the conjunctiva of the eye. Dry eye metrics (CDEA and Oculus 5M) will be collected during the patient's baseline appointment, 2-5 days prior to surgery, and post-operative month 1. Microbial load swabs will be collected at baseline, 2-5 days prior to surgery, and date of the surgery. An ocular assessment will also be completed at baseline, one week post-operation, and one month post-operation. All metrics will be compared to the fellow eye. The usage of omega-3 will be compared to the regimen without omega-3.
This study is being conducted to determine if scleral lenses coated with Hydra-PED improve comfort and dryness.
A study to assess the effect of the Dry Eye Drink on eye dryness
The lipid layer of the tear film is critical to maintaining the integrity of the tear film and deficiency in the tear film lipid layer (TFLL) is the cause of evaporative dry eye (EDE) in approximately 80% of dry eye disease patients, resulting in excessive evaporation (so-called hyperevaporative dry eye). This study protocol was designed to assess and compare the effects of intense pulsed light (IPL), heated eye mask (HEM), vectored thermal pulsation system (VTPS), and eyelid massage device (EMD) for improving signs and symptoms of EDE. EDE patients will be randomly divided into IPL, HEM, VTPS, and EMD groups and will be followed up for four weeks. The primary outcome measure will be non-invasive tear breakup time (NITBUT). The secondary outcome measures will include, tear film lipid layer score (TFLL), meibomian gland function and secretion quality change from baseline conjunctival and cornea staining (CFS) with fluorescein and lissamine, tear meniscus height (TMH), conjunctival hyperemia (RS score) and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire. Additionally, adverse events also were monitored and documented.
The goal of this interventional investigation is to compare BUFY02 with TRB02 in the treatment of patients with dry eye disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is BUFY02 non-inferior to TRB02 in terms of signs of DED? - Is BUFY02 non-inferior to TRB02 in terms of symptoms of DED? Participants will be asked to: - Visit the trial site at 4 different timepoints - Use the allocated study treatment everyday until the end of the study (during 3 months) - Be examined by the investigator - Complete several questionnaires - Return unused study treatment. Researchers will compare BUFY02 to TRB02 to see if both study treatments provide similar effects on signs and symptoms of the disease, together with comparable safety.
The goal of this interventional investigation is to compare BUFY01 with SVS20 in the treatment of patients with dry eye disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is BUFY01 non-inferior to SVS20 in terms of signs of DED? - Is BUFY01 non-inferior to SVS20 in terms of symptoms of DED? Participants will be asked to: - Visit the trial site at 4 different timepoints - Use the allocated study treatment everyday until the end of the study (during 3 months) - Be examined by the investigator - Complete several questionnaires - Return unused study treatment. Researchers will compare BUFY01 to SVS20 to see if both study treatments provide similar effects on signs and symptoms of the disease, together with comparable safety.
The goal of this non-randomized, prospective, open, one-arm clinical study is to learn about the clinical efficacy of stem cell eye drops in patients with dry eye disease (DED) who failed to respond to artificial tear sodium hyaluronate eye drops three times a day for two weeks. The main question aims to answer are: - How effective are stem cell eye drops in patients with DED? - How safe are stem cell eye drops for patients with DED? Participants will be treated with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) eye drops, 5×10^5 /50μl in each eye, twice a day for two weeks and they will be followed up for three months after treatment.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the preliminary safety and effectiveness of Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosome (PSC-MSC-Exo) Eye Drops in the treatment of dry eye diseases post refractive surgery and associated with blepharospasm