View clinical trials related to Dry Eye Syndrome.
Filter by:In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) has been used in clinical settings for more than 25 years, and is noninvasive, rapid and easily repeatable technique to investigate ocular surface disorders. It enables morphological and quantitative analysis of ocular surface microstructure. [1-3] As the technology advances, new IVCM machine, Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph with Rostock Corneal Module (HRT-RCM), was developed. Hardware and software modifications and acquisition techniques continue to expand the applications of the HRT-RCM for quantitative in vivo corneal imaging at the cellular level. The new software can access the corneal nerve more accurate. Here the investigators proposed this Institutional Review Board (IRB) to collect healthy persons and cases of different systematic diseases as well as etiologies of ocular surface diseases.
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of rhNGF eye drops at 20 μg/ml concentration administered two or three times daily for 4 weeks in patients with moderate to severe dry eye.
The comprehensive analysis of health records, TCM constitution, biomarker, and whole-genome sequencing among dry eye syndrome, healthy control, Sjögren's syndrome and other inflammation disease in Taiwan: an integrated analysis between Taiwan Biobank and Sjögren's syndrome Database
To explore the association among TCM pattern, TCM tongue diagnosis and TCM pulse diagnosis for Autoimmune disease and Dry eye syndrome
The main objective is to describe the characteristics of dry eye syndrome before and after surgery at one month of cataract surgery, using a multimodal analysis of the ocular surface. The secondary objectives are to evaluate: - Predictive factors of dry eye syndrome during cataract surgery: - The characteristics of dry eye syndrome - Implications for the patient's quality of life
In subjects with Dry Eye Syndrome (DES): The primary objective of this study is to confirm the efficacy of TOP1630 0.1% Ophthalmic Solution TID OU compared to placebo treatment at Day 29 on pre-specified sign and symptom endpoints in subjects with moderate to severe DES.
Efficacy of T2769 in Dry Eye Desease
This is a national, prospective, multicenter, comparative, randomized, single-blinded non-inferiority study performed in two parallel groups. 3 months (plus a run in period of 15 days prior inclusion) Patients with moderate to severe dry eye syndrome.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether SkQ1 ophthalmic solutions are safe and effective compared to placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye syndrome.
This is a phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, placebo control, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered SA001 compared to placebo in patients with Dry Eye Syndrome. The clinical trial consists of a wash-out period of 14 days, a treatment period of 12 weeks, and a follow-up period of 1 week after administration of the Investigational Product. If the subject voluntarily signs the informed consent form(ICF), the investigator conducts screening tests and check medical history to evaluate the subject's suitability. As a result of the screening test, eligible subjects should stop using the prior medication for dry eye syndrome during the 14 days of observation period, and if necessary, subjects can use rescue drug(artificial tears) for the first 11 days, and then discontinue all eye drops including rescue drug(artificial tears) for 3 days. And all of these subjects will be randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive 3 different doses of investigational product (SA001 or placebo) everyday for 12 weeks. During the treatment period, If necessary, subjects can use the rescue drug (artificial tears), and the number of administration of rescue drug is limited to 3 times a day, and when used, the administration time should be recorded in the subject's diary. Subjects should visit to the study site on 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after starting dosing investigational product. Efficacy evaluation results are collected from both eyes, and the primary evaluation variable is analyzed using the test results collected from 'Worse eye' (the eye with the worse keratoconjunctival staining result among both eyes). Worse eye will be determined at the baseline visit and, if the results of both eyes are the same, the test result of the left eye is used.