View clinical trials related to Drain Site Complication.
Filter by:The usage of vessel sealing devices has been gaining popularity in all surgical specialties. Post-renal transplant drain placement is a common practice among transplant surgeons. However, prolonged drainage accompanied by surgical wound complications and perirenal fluid collections is a frequent complication experienced by the recipients. This study aimed to compare bipolar sealing with conventional back-table dissection in terms of post-renal transplant drainage duration, amount, surgical wound complication, and back-table preparation time.
This is a prospective randomized, controlled, unblinded, interventional feasibility study to evaluate if showering with post operative drains in place leads to an increase in complications. The patients included in the study will be those undergoing breast reductions and panniculectomies at Geisinger Medical Center. The patients will be randomized post operatively into one of two groups: 1) patients instructed to shower with drains in place, and 2) patients instructed not to shower while they have drains in place.
This study aims to evaluate if the application of chlorhexidine gluconate dressing on surgical drain sites can decrease drain site infection vs the standard of care (dry, sterile gauze).
The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of pain and mean hospital stay in patients with and without drain insertion, following laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acutely inflamed gallbladder.
A precautionary measure that is frequently used after a neck surgery is the usage of suction drains, which allow the evacuation or air and fluids accumulated at the site of the surgery using negative pressure. Theoretically this helps promote better healing of the wound. Usage of suction drains, however, requires keeping some patients hospitalized after surgery for drain surveillance while they could have otherwise been discharged to safely begin their convalescence at home. In other cases, patient hospitalisation can be prolonged by the usage of suction drains, because surgeons wait for the output of the drain to fall below a certain quantity before removing them. This of course results in additional costs to the health system. The quantity below which the drain output should fall before drain removal is however not something agreed upon in the medical literature and is generally based on a surgeon's personal experience or that of the institution in which they practice. It would be important to better define this value, since prolonged usage of suction drains is not risk-free. Indeed, they constitute, among other things, an access for bacteria to cause an infection to develop inside the neck, which compromises wound healing and may result in more pronounced scarring. This study aims to compare a frequently used output value (30 mL per 24 hours) with a more permissive one of 50 mL per 24 hours. The investigators will look more specifically at wound complications, length of hospitalisation and cost-effectiveness for the health system. This study will recruit patients undergoing neck surgery at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal to compare both of these suction drain output values.