View clinical trials related to Donor Site Complication.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial] is to compare different types of dressings used and there outcomes on STSG donor site wound. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - the effectiveness of different donor site dressings and their adverse outcomes - the satisfaction of patients with the donor site dressing will be observed. Participants will randomly allocated different types of dressings for split thickness skin graft donor site wound which include alginate hydrocolloid hydrofiber silicon film guaze
Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN) is a safe procedure and rapid wound healing, affecting the quality of life. The physiology of postoperative pain after LLDN has been attributed to reasons such as tissue damage, residual pneumoperitoneum, and diaphragm irritation. In terms of patient comfort after LLDN, pain control is provided by IV analgesics, local anesthetic injection instead of incision, and regional techniques. Regional anesthesia techniques for postoperative pain control have become popular in recent years. Today, many blocks are performed with ultrasonography (USG) to reduce the severity of pain after laparoscopic and open surgeries. In 2016, Forero et al. erector spinae plane block (ESPB) had been defined and used successfully in thoracic and abdominal surgeries. In our clinic, peripheral nerve blocks such as intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and ESPB are applied for postoperative analgesia. The method of analgesia is suitable for the surgery and explained to the patients. This study; In LLDN operations, it was aimed to compare the bilateral ESP block performed with USG in terms of postoperative pain scores and opioid analgesic consumption compared to patients without any block. Before the operation, the anesthesiologist in charge of the anesthesia outpatient clinic provides information about both anesthesia and postoperative pain management methods suitable for surgery. This is the standard practice in our clinic. Before anesthesia, anesthesia and analgesia methods will be briefly reminded to the patient who has come for the operation. He/she will be asked if he/she wants to apply postoperative analgesia. Block procedure will be applied to patients who want ESP block. Standard analgesia will be applied to all patients. Regardless of the study, patients who underwent LLDN operation will be interviewed in the postoperative period with or without an ESP block for postoperative analgesia. The data and postoperative evaluations of the patients who agreed to participate in the study will be recorded for study purposes. The patient data will be taken from the hospital registration system.
In the field of reconstructive microsurgery, donor site morbidity after free flap harvest is one of the key factors to consider when choosing among different options of free flap. Peroneal artery-based free flap, such as fibula flap or peroneal flap, is one of the popular options of free flap. There are a plenty of literature using a variety of modalities to evaluate the donor site morbidity after free fibula harvest, such as gait analysis. Elastography has been used to evaluate the stiffness change of soft tissue, such as skeletal muscle, or liver. The purpose of this study is to use elastography to evaluate the stiffness of lower leg muscle after peroneal artery-based free flap harvest.
The aim of this study was to investigate if previous findings on the association between dressing treatments and subjective opinion on final donor site scar outcome using the patient scale of POSAS could be confirmed objectively. Scar outcome measurements were assessed by a blinded observer using POSAS and the device: Cutometer dual MPA 580 (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany) to measure the viscoelasticity of the skin.
The post-operative delirium picture is a serious and common complication seen after any major surgery, including hepatic resection. Patients who will be planned to undergo donor hepatectomy for liver transplantation will be included in the study. Basic clinical and demographic information of patients undergoes donor hepatectomy will be recorded before surgery. The anatomical parameters such as liver volume, medications performed during the surgery, complications, bleeding amounts, fluids given, blood and blood products, vital signs during surgery, fluid balance, duration of surgery, recovery length at post-operative period, complications after surgery, approaches to complications, analgesics and other medications used, hemogram and other biochemical parameters (electrolytes, albumin, liver frontier tests, etc.), weight status, vital signs, duration of intensive care, post-operative VAS scores, drainage and information such as length of stay, length of hospital stay, the healing time of the wound will also be recorded. During the hospitalization, the delirium status of the patients will be evaluated with a delirium evaluation scale by consultant doctor. Blood will be taken for the measurement of S100β, NSE, and GFAP levels one day before donor hepatectomy and following day of hepatectomy, 3rd day, and 7th day in the post-operative period. The plasma of the blood taken will be separated and stored at -80 0C until working. Laboratory values are taken from the patients before the operation will be recorded over the system. The relationship between the results obtained and the delirium evaluation scores performed on the days followed will be evaluated. This study aims to analyze the delirium incidence and post-operative early S100β, NSE, and GFAP levels within the first week following the hepatectomy performed in live donors for liver transplantation.
CTG was harvested from 21 patients in each group. Donor site was treated with either GS (control) or GS+CY (test). Palatal tissue thickness, graft dimensions, working time (WT) and primary bleeding time were recorded intraoperatively. Patients recorded the quantity of analgesics (QA) taken, presence of secondary bleeding (SB) and pain perception (PP) daily for first postoperative week. Sensation loss (SL), color match (CM), epithelization level (EL) were evaluated at days 7, 14, 21 and 28.
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of evaluating the use of a composite collagen, silver-oxidized regenerated cellulose matrix compared to the standard of care dressing on donor site pain for patients undergoing split-thickness skin grafting in preparation for a larger study.
An irreparable rotator cuff tear (IRCT) is a challenge, with a controversial definition and different treatment options. None of the latter are exempt of limitations and their survivorship is one of the concerns. In 2013, Mihata et al. proposed a novel treatment option: arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction using a fascia lata autograft (FL-ASCR) harvested through an open approach. Although no harvest site dysfunction was reported, concerns about donor site morbidity discouraged the use of this type of graft. In 2015, the investigators modified the original FL-ASCR introducing a minimally invasive fascia lata harvesting technique, aiming to reproduce FL-ASCR's promising clinical results in IRCT, while reducing donor site morbidity. The investigators aim to: 1) Evaluate the mid-term outcomes and donor site morbidity impact of FL-ASCR with minimally invasive harvesting; 2) Analyze the mid-term graft integrity to determine its survivorship 3) Establish clinical and imaging graft integrity correlations to guide the future treatment algorithm.
The purpose of this study was to specifically compare the long term patient satisfaction of the abdomen after DIEAP flap procedure with conventional abdominoplasty.
Primary objective: 1. To evaluate the safety of TWB-103 in split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds (DSW) for Phase I in terms of Incidence of treatment-related AEs and SAEs (including infections and bleeding) 2. To evaluate the efficacy for Phase I+II of TWB-103 in split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds (DSW) in terms of The healing time from DSW creation to 100% re-epithelialization Secondary objective: 1. To evaluate the efficacy of TWB-103 in split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds (DSW) in secondary efficacy endpoints 2. To evaluate the safety of TWB-103 in split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds (DSW) in secondary safety endpoints