View clinical trials related to Diverticulitis, Colonic.
Filter by:This observational study aims to test proteomics, metabolomics and proteoglycans as predictors of postoperative complications after colorectal surgery and as biomarkers of colorectal cancer. The main questions to answer are: - can these biomarkers predict anastomotic leakages - can these biomarkers predict recurrence after colorectal cancer - can these biomarkers be used as diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer - can these biomarkers be identified in the tumor Participants will undergo elective colorectal resection or stoma closure.
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the safety and effect of fecal microbiome transplantation (FMT) in patients with a former episode of acute colonic diverticulitis. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - Is FMT in patients with a former episode of acute colonic diverticulitis a safe procedure without severe adverse events - What is the impact of FMT on patient-reported outcomes and re-admission rate Participants will be asked to: - to ingest either 25-30 capsules with FMT or placebo capsules - Fill-in GI-QLI questionnaire prior to treatment/placebo and 3 months post baseline - Fill-in eating habit questionnaire - deliver blood-and stool samples prior to treatment/placebo and 3 months post baseline - In both the treatment and placebo group 5 patients will be offered sigmoideoscopy for mucosal biopsies if it is more than 2 items]. If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare [insert groups] to see if [insert effects]
BACKGROUND: Acute right lower quadrant pain is a common symptom in emergency departments. The most common etiology is thought to be acute appendicitis. Other etiologies may be overlooked. Acute right colon diverticulitis is one of them. It is usually seen in male and young patients. It is more common in Asian population and rare in Western countries. Ultrasonography (USG) and computed tomography (CT) are used for radiologic diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnosis, treatment and surgical management of right colon diverticulitis.
It is estimated that approximately 15% to 20% of the subjects with sigmoid diverticulosis will develop acute diverticulitis, with diverticular abscess as the most common complication of sigmoid diverticulitis. While cases with free perforations and diffuse peritonitis require emergency surgery, in cases with contained perforation and abscess formation, the approach is initially conservative. Due to its relative rarity, the treatment of diverticular abscess is not based on high-quality scientific evidence. Abscess size of 4-6 cm is generally accepted as reasonable cutoff determining the choice of treatment between antibiotic therapy and antibiotic therapy plus percutaneous drainage of the abscess. A subgroup of patients will fail the conservative approach and require a surgical rescue strategy. However, the real incidence for conservative treatment failure after non-operative management of acute diverticulitis with abscess remain poorly understood, the knowledge of which could improve decision-making processes, treatment strategies, patient counseling, and even modify the planned treatment strategy in patients deemed at highest risk. The early recognition of patients who show clinical signs of ongoing and worsening intra-abdominal sepsis due to perforation is important to ensure the success of this strategy. In the light of these, knowledge of risk predictors for failure is of utmost importance. Owing the contrasting evidence summary, we set up a multicenter retrospective cohort study that merges the cases from twelve high-volume centers for emergency surgery in Italy to assess the short-term outcomes of initial non-surgical treatment strategies for AD with abscess formation (Hinchey Ib and II) in a large number of patients, and identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes, to help facilitate appropriate patient selection and assess the optimal treatment strategy for this peculiar subgroup of patients. The purpose of this study is to describe the incidence and risk factors for conservative treatment (antibiotics alone or antibiotics plus percutaneous drainage) failure after non-operative management of acute diverticulitis with abscess using a large multicenter patient series. The present study is designed as a multicenter retrospective observational study conducted at twelve secondary and tertiary Italian teaching surgical centers on CT-diagnosed hemodynamically stable patients (≥18 years) with perforated acute diverticulitis with abscess (with or without extraluminal air) initially treated non-surgically. The rate of failure of non-operative treatment for complicated acute diverticulitis patients with abscess formation and the risk factors of failure of the non-surgical treatment will be assessed. Failure of the conservative treatment is defined as lack of clinical improvement in the general conditions of the patient during index hospital admission, requiring urgent surgery to treat intra-abdominal sepsis.
The goal of this observational study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN®, Ca.Di.Group S.p.A) in the treatment of symptomatic patients after an episode of both complicated and uncomplicated acute colonic diverticulitis. The main question it aims to answer are: - Is the studied probiotic able to significantly reduce symptoms, assessed by means of a validated and dedicated score? - Is there any difference in microbiota among the study group at baseline and a selected cohort of patients subdivided in subjects with diverticulosis and asymptomatic subjects after an episode of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis or an episode of complicated diverticulitis submitted to surgery with colonic resection without stoma? - Is there any difference in microbiota in the study group at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment with the probiotic? - Is there any correlation between microbiota modification and symptoms during follow-up? - Is there any impact on fecal calprotectin values before and during probiotic therapy? - Is there any modification of evacuation before and during follow-up? - Is probiotic able to prevent recurrent episodes of acute diverticulitis during follow-up? - The safety of the probiotic will be assessed during the follow-up. The study group will be assessed at baseline and during follow-up with a dedicated clinical score and Bristol stool scale. Microbiota and fecal calprotectin values will be also assessed at baseline and during follow-up. Microbiota at baseline will be also evaluated for comparison in the three selected groups with diverticulosis and both asymptomatic and symptomatic after an episode of acute diverticulitis.
Acute colonic diverticulitis is when a part of the colon gets swollen and inflamed. The diagnosis is based on a CT scan, which can show thickening of the colonic walls and infiltration of the diverticula. These changes and the concomitant symptoms can overlap with colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, the guidelines suggest that people with diverticulitis should be offered a colonoscopy to ensure, that CRC is not the underlying cause of the changes and symptoms. In Denmark, a lot of people get hospitalized each year due to diverticulitis, and many of them end up having colonoscopies with the purpose of excluding CRC. Currently, there are no methods for guiding colonoscopies following a diverticulitis episode, resulting in numerous unnecessary colonoscopies each year. In the Diverticulitis study, we want to investigate if a simple blood test analyzed for the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), can help us decide who needs a colonoscopy. We will collect blood samples from 220 people with diverticulitis and categorize them into ctDNA positive and negative groups. The ctDNA category will be compared to the colonoscopy results to see if there is a correlation between being ctDNA positive and having a CRC diagnosed at the colonoscopy. This study could change clinical practice since we anticipate that ctDNA-guided triaging of diverticulitis patients is a cost-effective strategy for selecting diverticulitis patients needing colonoscopy, ensuring detection of the underlying CRC, and significantly reducing the number of patients undergoing unnecessary colonoscopy.
The goal of this observational study is to study the emergency surgical treatment of diverticular disease in Sweden outside clinical trials. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Which is the preferred surgical method of acute diverticular disease in Sweden? - Which are the short and long-term outcomes of the different surgical methods? Researchers will compare the different methods to see if there is a surgical operation that is superior for the treatment of acute diverticulitis.
Introduction: Follow-up after colonic diverticulitis is a common indication for colonoscopy, even though studies have shown a low risk of positive findings in this population. The objective is to investigate colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) as a follow-up examination in patients with colonic diverticulitis compared to colonoscopy, on patient satisfaction and clinical performance. Methods and Analysis: The investigators will conduct a single centre prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients seen at Odense University Hospital with acute diverticulitis confirmed by CT will be included and randomized to either follow-up by colonoscopy or CCE. Detection of suspected cancer, more than two polyps or any number of polyps larger than 9mm in CCE will generate an invitation to a diagnostic colonoscopy for biopsies or polyp removal. The investigators will compare colonoscopy and CCE regarding patient satisfaction and tolerance, the number of complete examinations, the number of patients referred to a subsequent colonoscopy after CCE and the prevalence of diverticula, polyps, cancers and other abnormal findings.
Diverticular disease is one of the most common diseases of the gastrointestinal tract in industrial countries. Prevalence and admission rate due to diverticular disease increases. Symptomatic patients usually present with acute uncomplicated or complicated diverticulitis. Recurrence rates of complicated diverticulitis are estimated to 10-30%. Recurrences, chronic complications or persisting pain, here collectively referred to as chronic diverticular disease, may be treated by elective sigmoidectomy. Currently, there is no specific criteria for elective surgery, but only a recommendation of a tailored approach depending on the patient's symptoms. It is well established that diverticular disease has a negative impact on quality of life (QoL). Elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy may increase QoL. In this prospective study, we will prospectively examine QoL, patient-related outcomes and peri- and postoperative outcome of elective sigmoidectomy for chronic diverticular disease, and compare it to conservatively treated patients.
A multicenter prospective observational study. Aim of the study is to identify the clinical parameters correlating with favorable outcomes in patients undergoing surgery or medical treatment for diverticular disease. The primary aim is be the assessment of quality of life of theses patients according to the GIQLY score at 1 year from the enrollment in the registry. Patients will be enrolled in a prospective study and followed for 36 months after the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis. All participating centres are tertiary hospitals located in Europe .