View clinical trials related to Disorder of Shoulder.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine whether phenylephrine infusion are effective in the prevention of hypotension after changing position to beach chair position during general anesthesia for shoulder arthroscopic surgery. Investigators hypothesized that by increasing arterial blood pressure with phenylephrine infusion, incidence of hypotension would be decreased.
In this factorial design study, 280 participants having outpatient, arthroscopic shoulder surgery will be randomized into 4 equal sized groups. All participants will receive a standardized interscalene brachial plexus block and 4mg or 8mg of dexamethasone given by the intravenous or perineural (by the nerve with the nerve block) route just prior to their surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine which dose and route of dexamethasone provides the longest duration of pain control and the fewest side effects after surgery. The investigators hypothesize that giving dexamethasone by the perineural route, and by higher doses, will result in the longer durations of pain control, without increased side effects.
The purpose of this study is to measure the amount of movement between the bones of the shoulder joint when mobilization techniques are applied by a physical therapist.
Objective: To pilot the methods proposed for conducting a full randomised clinical trial to evaluate the effect of Mulligan concept mobilization with movement on shoulder functionality in older adults with shoulder dysfunction. Design: Pilot randomised, single-blinded clinical trial. Setting: Three nursing homes, Toledo, Spain. Participants: 44 older adults with shoulder dysfunction. Interventions: Participants will be randomly allocated into control group (n=22) treated with a physiotherapy standard protocol proposed by the Spanish Rheumatology Society; and experimental group (n=22) treated with the same physical therapy standard protocol and Mulligan concept mobilisation with movement. Both interventions will take place three times a week for 2 consecutive weeks. Main outcomes: Primary outcome is shoulder functionality measured with Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (S-SDQ) Spanish version, and secondary outcomes are active glenohumeral range of motion and pain intensity. Data will be collected at baseline, after each group intervention, and 1 and 3 months after finishing interventions.
Interscalene plexus block is a widely used technique to provide anesthesia and analgesia for surgery at the upper extremity (shoulder and upper arm); it is standard-of-care in many institutions worldwide. Local anesthetic is being injected around the nerves supplying the arm (Plexus brachialis) at a specific location in the arm (between the scalenus muscles, thus called "interscalene plexus block"). The optimal volume of injection with regard to efficacy, safety and avoidance of untoward effects has been subject to intense debate for a long time. In spite of evidence that small volumes (between 5 and 7 mls) are effective for adequate postoperative analgesia, larger volumes up to 40 mls are still frequently used in many practices. However, with the use of such large doses, adverse events are known to occur with increased frequency, including paralysis of the diaphragm or spread of local anesthetic to the spinal cord. This study is intended to help evaluate the effects of small or larger injection of local anesthetic around the brachial plexus, and to correlate the distribution with clinical efficacy, block duration, and possible side effects. It is a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded trial; patients undergoing shoulder or upper arm surgery will be randomly allocated to receive either 5mls or 20mls of local anesthetic for their interscalene plexus block. Magnetic resonance imaging will be performed immediately afterwards, followed by a series of neurological exams during the hospital stay. Test of lung function (spirometry) and ultrasound of the diaphragm will be used to evaluate effects of the block on respiratory mechanics.
For many years researchers have been documented that the shoulder of the throwing athlete acquires a increase in external rotation of the dominant limb compared to the contralateral side.This fact is followed with a loss of the internal rotation of the shoulder, which is related with a higher rate of injuries in this joint and it´s known as Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit (GIRD). Among the approaches for this condition the literature is inconclusive due to the low methodological quality of clinical trials made,however, the manual therapy has been used with success to relief the pain and restore the range of motion. The purpose of this study is to analyse the effectiveness of a mobilization with movement technique to improve the internal rotation of the shoulder in throwing athletes with GIRD. It will be a randomized controlled trial with the CONSORT bases with 40 participants that will be divided into two groups: - Control group that will be submitted for an evaluation of shoulder range of motion (internal/external rotation)of both limbs, upper limb active movements to warm-up (five minutes), posterior capsule stretching (Cross-body stretch for 3 sets of 30 seconds) and revaluation immediately post-intervention and four weeks post-intervention. - Mobilization group that will be submitted for an evaluation of shoulder range of motion (internal/external rotation)of both limbs, upper limb active movements to warm-up(five minutes), posterior capsule stretching (Cross-body stretch for 3 sets of 30 seconds) plus a mobilization with movement technique to improve internal rotation of the dominant shoulder (three sets of 10 repetitions)and revaluation immediately post-intervention and four weeks post-intervention. To evaluate the range of movement it will be use a standard goniometer with an attached customizes bubble inclinometer to ensure proper perpendicular alignment of the goniometer to the ground. The investigators hypothesis is that both group will have improvements in the internal rotation of the dominant shoulder, however, the mobilization group will have a statistically significant difference compared to control group immediately post-intervention. Four weeks post-intervention this difference will equalize, because of the only intervention applied. Results will be expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with their respective confidence intervals at 95% and adopting α = 0.05. All analyzes will be performed by SPSS version 17.0