View clinical trials related to Disease.
Filter by:The goal of this project, which has not changed, is to evaluate the statewide implementation of a two-component intervention (health promotion plus academic detailing) with respect to consumer outcomes and changes in provider prescribing. The intervention, called In SHAPE, is delivered to people with serious mental illness (SMI) by two community mental health clinics (CMHCs). These CMHCs are compared to two CMHCs delivering usual-care to individuals with SMI. The specific aims of this study are: 1. Evaluate person-level and provider-level outcomes including: (a) consumer health behaviors, health indicators, mental health indicators, and acute health service utilization, (b) provider prescribing practices and program fidelity, and (c) program costs. 2. Evaluate system-level outcomes including: (a) consumer health behaviors and health indicators, (b) provider prescribing and program fidelity, and (c) acute services use.
Few studies targeting obesity in serious mental illness have reported clinically significant risk reduction, and non have been replicated in community settings or demonstrated sustained outcomes after intervention withdrawal. The researchers sought to replicate positive health outcomes demonstrated in a previous randomized effectiveness study of the In SHAPE program across urban community mental health organizations serving an ethnically diverse population.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Trial with an optional Open-label Extension to evaluate the efficacy of bremelanotide (BMT), administered subcutaneously (SC) on an as needed basis for the treatment of HSDD (with or without decreased arousal) in premenopausal females.
Observational study aimed at evaluating the clinical impact of a standardised diagnostic procedure for the investigation of patients with suspected mild bleeding disorder (MBD).
The main objective of this study is to make a first evaluation of the relationship between metabolic abnormalities objectified by Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro- D-glucose integrated with computed tomography (PET CT 18 FDH) performed at rest at the onset of symptoms in patients with a first episode of motor conversion disorder and the persistence of a motor disability at 6 months measured by the modified Rankin score (mRS).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential benefits of combining cognitive remediation and exercise in improving cognitive functioning and response to psychiatric rehabilitation.
The study will test the hypothesis that Cognitive Behavioural Therapy plus Standardised Medical Care (SMC) will have greater clinical and cost effectiveness than SMC alone in treating adult patients with dissociative seizures which had not initially ceased after diagnosis. About 12-20% of patients who attend neurology or specialist epilepsy clinics because of seizures do not in fact have epilepsy. Most of these people have what are referred to as dissociative (non-epileptic) seizures (DS). This means that they have episodes that resemble epileptic seizures but which have no medical reason for their occurrence and instead are due to psychological factors. In younger adults DS are about four times more common in women than men. A high percentage of these people will have other psychological or psychiatric problems and may have other medically unexplained symptoms. It is generally thought that people with DS will benefit from psychological treatments. However, studies on this have been small or have not compared the psychological therapy with the treatment people normally receive (standardised medical care). There is some evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), which is a widely accepted talking therapy that focuses on the person's thoughts, emotions and behaviour, as well as considering the physical reactions and sensations that may occur in people's bodies, may lead to a reduction in how often people have DS. The investigators have previously developed a CBT package for people with DS. In a relatively small study by our group, published in 2010, people receiving CBT overall showed greater reduction in how often they had their DS. The investigators are now conducting a larger study, across several different hospitals, to obtain more definite results about the effectiveness of our CBT approach for DS. The investigators aim to invite ~ 500 adult patients with DS (but without current active epilepsy), who have been given their diagnosis by a neurologist or specialist in epilepsy, to take part in their study. Up to 698 might be invited if insufficient patients are progressing to the RCT. The investigators will collect initial information about these people and ask them to keep a record of how often they have their DS following diagnosis. Three months after the diagnosis, those who have agreed to take part in the study will be seen by a psychiatrist, who will undertake a psychiatric assessment and ask them about factors which may have led to the development of their DS. Patients who have continued to have DS in the previous 8 weeks and who meet other eligibility criteria and are willing to take part in the trial, will be randomly allocated to standardised medical care or CBT (plus standardised medical care) as further treatment for their seizures. These people will be asked to continue to complete seizure diaries and questionnaires, provide regular seizure frequency data following receipt of DS diagnosis and will need to be willing to attend weekly/fortnightly sessions if allocated to CBT. The investigators initially aim to randomise 298 people (149 to each study arm) although now allow for up to 356 to account for loss to follow-up.
This trial focuses on a Phase II randomized masked clinical trial testing the effectiveness and safety of peri-operative administration of ramelteon, a melatonin agonist in the prevention of postoperative delirium.
The investigators propose to explore the link between bipolar disorder, anxiety, and suicide by investigating intertemporal discounting in depressed, suicidal patients with bipolar I and II disorder who have various levels of anxiety. The investigators will determine the effect of anxiety on their intertemporal discounting (small rewards now compared to larger rewards later) in a decision-making paradigm and investigate the associated functional neuroanatomy using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the combination of prazosin and naltrexone will decrease alcohol cravings and drinking in individuals who have problems with alcohol and have used alcohol at risky levels compare to naltrexone and placebo (Nal/Pl), prazosin and placebo (Praz/Pl), and double-placebo (Pl/Pl). We hypothesize that those assigned to both prazosin and naltrexone would report significantly greater decreases in percent drinking days and heavy drinking days as well as significantly greater reduction in craving from pre to post-treatment than those assigned to either single medication or double-placebo. Prazosin is a medication that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat people with high blood pressure. Some studies have shown that prazosin may also decrease nightmares and improve sleep in Veterans suffering from Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Animal studies have consistently found that prazosin is associated with decreased alcohol consumption and that the combination of prazosin and naltrexone outperforms either medication alone. The current study is evaluating an "off-label" use of prazosin to determine whether it is helpful in decreasing alcohol cravings and consumption among people with alcohol problems. "Off-label" means that the FDA has not approved the use of prazosin for alcohol problems. Naltrexone is a medication that is FDA approved for treating alcohol problems. This study is sponsored by the Department of Defense and the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (DoD/CDMRP). We expect approximately 120 participants in this study, which will run over approximately 4 years. Study participants will be involved in the study for 7 weeks, or until they complete the Final Assessment.