Diabetic Foot Ulcer Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Prospective, Open, Multi-Center, Interventional, Non-Comparative Clinical Investigation to Follow the Progress of Exuding Chronic Wounds Using Mepilex® Up
NCT number | NCT05588583 |
Other study ID # | DIPLO01 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | October 31, 2022 |
Est. completion date | March 2024 |
The goal of this clinical trial is to follow the progress of wounds in those with venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers while using an absorbent dressing called Mepilex Up. The main objective is to follow the progress of these wounds over time from initial visit to each follow-up visit. Participants will be asked to wear Mepilex Up dressing for up to 6 weeks of treatment or until healed, changed at every one-week interval.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 68 |
Est. completion date | March 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Signed consent to participate (including consent for digital imaging) - Adult aged =18 years - Diagnosed with a chronic, exuding VLU or DFU - Exudate amount moderate to large - Wound size from 3 cm2 to 30 cm2 for VLU and =1 cm2 for DFU, as determined by the clinician - For VLU: ABPI (within 3 months) > 0.7. If ABPI > 1.4, then big toe pressure > 60 mmHg is required or an alternative measurement verifying normal distal arterial flow - For VLU: Willing to be compliant with compression therapy Exclusion Criteria: - Infected ulcer according to the judgment of the investigator defined as any wound condition requiring the prescription or continuation of systemic antibiotic therapy at enrollment - Circumferential wound - Known allergy/hypersensitivity to the materials of the dressing - Patients participating in the DIPLO NBF study - Use of wound fillers |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Center for Clinical Research, Inc. | Castro Valley | California |
United States | Felix Sigal, DPM | Los Angeles | California |
United States | University of Miami | Miami | Florida |
United States | Serena Group Research Institute | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Molnlycke Health Care AB |
United States,
Augustin M, Conde Montero E, Zander N, Baade K, Herberger K, Debus ES, Diener H, Neubert T, Blome C. Validity and feasibility of the wound-QoL questionnaire on health-related quality of life in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Sep;25(5):852-857. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12583. Epub 2017 Nov 2. — View Citation
Chadwick P, McCardle J. Exudate management using a gelling fibre dressing. The Diabetic Foot Journal. 2015;18(1):43-8.
European Wound Management Association (EWMA). Position document: Wound bed preparation in practice. London: MEP Ltd. 2004.
Fletcher J. Development of a new wound assessment form, Clinical practice development. Wounds UK. 2010;6(1).
Gonzalez de la Torre H, Quintana-Lorenzo ML, Perdomo-Perez E, Verdu J. Correlation between health-related quality of life and venous leg ulcer's severity and characteristics: a cross-sectional study. Int Wound J. 2017 Apr;14(2):360-368. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12610. Epub 2016 Apr 25. — View Citation
Gorin DR, Cordts PR, LaMorte WW, Manzoian JO. The influence of wound geometry on the measurement of wound healing rates in clinical trials. J Vasc Surg. 1996 Mar;23(3):524-8. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)80021-8. — View Citation
Gould L, Abadir P, Brem H, Carter M, Conner-Kerr T, Davidson J, DiPietro L, Falanga V, Fife C, Gardner S, Grice E, Harmon J, Hazzard WR, High KP, Houghton P, Jacobson N, Kirsner RS, Kovacs EJ, Margolis D, McFarland Horne F, Reed MJ, Sullivan DH, Thom S, Tomic-Canic M, Walston J, Whitney J, Williams J, Zieman S, Schmader K. Chronic wound repair and healing in older adults: current status and future research. Wound Repair Regen. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):1-13. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12245. Epub 2015 Feb 13. — View Citation
Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, Fainsinger R, Aass N, Kaasa S; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jun;41(6):1073-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016. — View Citation
Jones JE, Robinson J, Barr W, Carlisle C. Impact of exudate and odour from chronic venous leg ulceration. Nurs Stand. 2008 Jul 16-22;22(45):53-4, 56, 58 passim. doi: 10.7748/ns2008.07.22.45.53.c6592. — View Citation
Maume S, Van De Looverbosch D, Heyman H, Romanelli M, Ciangherotti A, Charpin S. A study to compare a new self-adherent soft silicone dressing with a self-adherent polymer dressing in stage II pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 Sep;49(9):44-51. — View Citation
Moore Z, Strapp H. Managing the problem of excess exudate. Br J Nurs. 2015 Aug 13-Sep 19;24(15):S12, S14-7. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.Sup15.S12. — View Citation
Rippon M WM, Bielfeldt S. An evaluation of properties related to wear time of four dressings during a five-day period. Wounds UK. 2015;11(1):45-54.
Rippon M, Davies P, White R. Taking the trauma out of wound care: the importance of undisturbed healing. J Wound Care. 2012 Aug;21(8):359-60, 362, 364-8. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2012.21.8.359. — View Citation
Romanelli M, Vowden K, Weir D. Exudate Management Made Easy Wounds International 2010.
Tickle J. Wound exudate: a survey of current understanding and clinical competency. Br J Nurs. 2016 Jan 28-Feb 10;25(2):102-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.2.102. — View Citation
Walker M, Parsons D. Hydrofiber® technology: its role in exudate management. Wounds UK; 2010. p. 31-38.
World Union of Wound Healing Societies (WUWHS). Principles of best practice: Wound exudate and the role of dressings. A consensus document. 2019.
Young T, Clark M, Augustin M, Carville K, Curran J, Flour M, et al. International consensus. Optimising wellbeing in people living with a wound. An expert working group review. Wounds International; London 2012.
* Note: There are 18 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Wound progress of the total effect of treatment using Mepilex Up | Wound progress is the total effect of treatment using Mepilex Up as the absorbent dressing and includes the changes in an objectively measured wound area and subjectively evaluated wound condition by the treating investigator/designee. Wound progress will be assessed as deteriorated, no change, improved, or healed at each visit. Wound area will be measured by an independent evaluator assisted by digital software at each visit and recorded as cm2 using the formula, A= p*L*W/4. | From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Percentage wound area reduction over time | The percentage of wound area (cm2) reduction over time will be assessed by a formula as the area of an ellipse and measured by an independent evaluator assisted by digital software on all digital photographs taken at each scheduled visit. | From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Percentage wound volume reduction over time (DFUs only) | The percentage wound volume (cm3) reduction over time will be calculated by a formula from the manually assessed wound depth and the digitally assessed wound area. | From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Linear wound healing over time | The linear wound healing will be calculated with Gilman's formula (cm/day), G = - (A1-A0)/ {[(P1+P0)/2]*(t1-t0)}, where:
A0 = previous visit area A1 = current visit area P0 = previous visit perimeter P1 = current visit perimeter t0 = previous visit time t1 = current visit time. Area (A) and Perimeter (P) will be assessed by an independent evaluator assisted by digital software. Perimeter (P) will be measured in cm and Area (A) will be assessed in cm2. |
From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Change in granulation tissue over time | The area of wound covered by granulation tissue, (%) before and after cleansing/debridement will be assessed as follows: 1) via an independent evaluator assisted by digital software; and 2) via visual judgement by investigator/designee and determined as: None, 1%-24%, 25%-49%, 50%-74%, or 75%-100%. | From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Change in sloughy tissue over time | The area of wound covered by sloughy tissue, (%) before and after cleansing/debridement will be assessed as follows: 1) via an independent evaluator assisted by digital software; and 2) via visual judgement by investigator/designee and determined as: None, 1%-24%, 25%-49%, 50%-74%, or 75%-100%. | From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Change in exudate amount over time | Exudate amount will be captured as a subjective measure from the investigator/designee and assessed as none, scant, small, moderate, or large. | From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Change in exudate nature over time | Exudate nature will be captured as a subjective measure from the investigator/designee via the following category descriptive scale: serous, serosanguinous, sanguineous, seropurulent, fibrinous, purulent, hemopurulent, or hemorrhagic. | From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Change in peri-wound skin condition over time | The change in peri-wound skin condition over time will be assessed by visual assessment (No/Yes) by investigator/designee for maceration, dry skin, erythema/redness, and other peri-wound skin conditions. The Transepidermal Water Loss, or TEWL, will be an additional variable assessed at every visit for VLU Subjects at a limited number of clinical sites. TEWL measurements will be done using a portable VapoMeter. | From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Change in maceration over time | Area of wound covered by macerated tissue (%) will be assessed before debridement in cm2 by an independent evaluator assisted by digital software.
The maximal distance (cm) from as close to the wound edge as possible to the end of maceration, assessed from wound photo, taken before debridement, by an independent evaluator assisted by digital software. The area of maceration will be assessed from a wound photo taken before debridement by an independent evaluator assisted by digital software. |
From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Wound/Peri-Wound itch score prior to dressing removal over time (PRO) | The Subject itch severity before dressing removal over time will be assessed at all follow-up visits using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The Subject verbally rates their level of itchiness on a level from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no itch and 10 is the worst itch. | From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Wound pain score during dressing wear over time (PRO) | Subject pain severity during dressing wear over time will be assessed at all follow-up visits using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The Subject verbally rates the pain on a level from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 is the worst pain. | From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Wound pain score related to removal of dressing over time (PRO) | Subject pain severity at dressing removal will be assessed at all follow-up visits using the NRS scale where the Subject verbally rates the pain on a level from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 is the worst pain. Any pre-procedural or intra-procedural pain medication administered at the time of dressing removal will be recorded. | A maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Trauma to the wound/peri-wound during dressing removal over time | Trauma to the wound will be captured via visual judgement by the investigator/desginee using an ordinal scale of none, very slight, moderate, or high. Trauma to the peri-wound skin will be captured via visual judgement by the investigator/designee using the ordinal scale of none, very slight, moderate, or high. | A maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Primary dressing's ability to be comfortable to wear (PRO) | Subjects will be asked to rate Mepilex Up degree of comfort using a 4-item scale of very poor, poor, good, or very good. | A maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | For VLU: Mepilex Up ability to be comfortable to wear with compression (PRO) | VLU Subjects will be asked to rate Mepilex Up degree of comfort while wearing with compression using a 4-item scale of very poor, poor, good, or very good. | A maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | For DFU: Mepilex Up ability to be comfortable to wear with offloading (PRO) | DFU Subjects will be asked to rate Mepilex Up degree of comfort while wearing with offloading using a 4-item scale of very poor, poor, good, or very good. | A maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Evaluation of Wound Quality of Life (QoL) (PRO) | A Wound-QoL-17 questionnaire will be completed by each Subject to measure the disease-specific, health-related QoL of those with chronic wounds. All items assess impairments within the preceding seven days. | A maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Technical Performance (Investigator/designee's evaluation) | Several questions will be asked to evaluate the technical performance properties of Mepilex Up. The following will be assessed by the investigator/designee using no/yes values: 1) Occurrence of strike-through, defined as the inability of the dressing to stay sealed over the wound causing leakage of wound exudate; and 2) Occurrence of product residue in the wound bed or on peri-wound skin after dressing removal. All other properties will be assessed by the investigator/designee using a 4-item scale of very poor, poor, good, very good. These include:
Ability to absorb exudates with different viscosities, Ability to retain exudate, Ease of application, Ability to conform to the wound during wear, Ability to be repositioned during application, Inability to adhere to moist wound bed, Ability to adhere to healthy, intact skin, Ability to stay on during application and use, Overall satisfaction with the dressing's properties. |
A maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Status of dressing during a routine dressing change or complication | The status of Mepilex Up during a routine dressing change or complication will be assessed by the investigator/designee as strike-through, saturated, displaced/slipping, or other. This will be recorded in the Dressing Log. | A maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Pre-compression edema | The specification of any pre-compression edema prior to applying/changing compression therapy will be assessed by the investigator/designee as:
0 (no clinical edema) 1+ (=2 mm indentation) 2+ (2-4 mm indentation) 3+ (4-6 mm indentation) 4+ (6-8 mm indentation) |
A maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Compression removed/changed/applied | Assessment of compression by the investigator/designee will cover:
Compression removal (No/Yes) Compression changed/applied (No/Yes) Type of compression used |
A maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Compliance with compression | The investigator/designee will evaluate Subject compliance with compression. Assessment will include being fully compliant (defined as 7 out of 7 days with compression), moderately compliant (defined as 1 to 3 days without compression out of 7 days), or not compliant (defined as >3 days without compression out of 7 days). | A maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Offloading Use/Type | The assessment of offloading will cover if it were used (No/Yes) and specification of offloading type by the investigator/designee. | A maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Compliance to offloading | The investigator/designee will evaluate Subject compliance with offloading. Assessment will include being fully compliant (defined as 7 out of 7 days with offloading), moderately compliant (defined as 1 to 3 days without offloading out of 7 days), or not compliant (defined as >3 days without offloading out of 7 days). | A maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Wear time (days) | Wear time will be determined from the Subject Dressing Log at each visit by collecting:
Date of dressing application/change Reason for change application/change Lot/batch Size Quantity |
From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Debridement performed | The following debridement details will be recorded for each Subject at each visit:
Debridement performed (No/Yes) Debridement method Ease of debridement (Very easy/Easy/Difficult/Very Difficult) |
From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Cleansing performed | The following cleansing details will be recorded for each Subject at each visit:
Cleansing performed (No/Yes) Type of cleansing agent used |
From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. | |
Secondary | Evaluation of all reported adverse events and device deficiencies | If any reported adverse events or device deficiencies are reported, an evaluation will take place to determine root cause. | From baseline visit to last follow-up visit, a maximum total treatment period of 44 days or until healed, whichever occurs first. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04497805 -
Clinical Study of ALLO-ASC-SHEET in Subjects With Diabetic Wagner Grade II Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03675269 -
Adjunctive Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) for Lower Extermity Diabetic Ulcer:
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04624516 -
Effect of Self-foot Exercise on the Incidence of Plantar Foot Diabetic Ulcer Recurrence
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06439667 -
VIRTUALLY SUPERVISED TELE-EXERCISE PLATFORM FOR ACCELERATING PLANTAR WOUND HEALING
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05608187 -
Evaluating Safety and Biological Effect on Wound Healing of ILP100-Topical in Subjects With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06278935 -
Lifestyle Tailored Offloading for Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06437028 -
Evaluating the Efficacy of Perinatal Membrane Allografts for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05024656 -
AmnioExcel® Plus vs SOC in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02202668 -
Transcutaneous Raman Spectroscope (TRS) Analyses of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01951768 -
Efficacy and Safety of Garamycin® Sponge in Diabetic Patients With a Moderate or Severe Foot Ulcer Infection
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT01966380 -
Proof of Concept (Design Validation) in Patient With Hard to Heal Wounds Such as Pressure Ulcer, Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Leg Ulcer, Leia
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01657474 -
Comparative Study of Two Application Regimens of Amniotic Membrane Wound Graft In the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00389636 -
TheraGauzeā¢ Alone and Regranex®Gel 0.01% Plus TheraGauzeā¢ in the Treatment of Wagner Stage I Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01181440 -
Dermagraft(R) for the Treatment of Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 3 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05888259 -
Plantar Pressure Distribution in Diabetic Foot Ulcer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04054804 -
Digital Foot Check by Using the D-Foot, a New Software
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05877378 -
Efficacy of PICO Single-use System in Chronic Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06037369 -
The Short Message-based Customized Standardized
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03312595 -
Clinical Outcomes After Treatment With RestrataTM Wound Matrix in Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04564443 -
A Unique Micro Water Jet Technology Device Versus Standard Debridement in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot
|
N/A |