View clinical trials related to Diabetic Foot Ulcer.
Filter by:This study is a prospective comparative study to determine if an Iodine Gel (Iodosorb◊) is better than standard dressing (Solosite◊ gel) in disruption of biofilm (small microorganism bacteria similar to plaque on teeth) on the wound bed diabetic foot ulcers. ◊ Trademark of Smith & Nephew
This is an open label study of subjects who have failed Protocol PGN-1300. Adult subjects (greater than 18 years old) who present with a mildly infected diabetic foot ulcer (IDSA criteria) having full thickness (i.e., through the dermis but not involving joint capsule, tendon, and bone) and have failed PGN-1300. Subjects must also provide informed consent and meet all other entry criteria to be enrolled and receive PluroGel PN.
This will be a randomized, double-blind (evaluator-blind), vehicle-controlled study of 50 enrolled subjects. Adult subjects (greater than 18 years old) who present with a mildly infected diabetic foot ulcer (IDSA criteria) having full thickness (i.e., through the dermis but not involving joint capsule, tendon, and bone). Subjects must also provide informed consent and meet all other entry criteria to be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive PluroGel N or PluroGel vehicle.
Boron as a naturally occurring element has some metabolic and inflammatory actions. The antibacterial activity against gram negative bacteria is also known. Boron deficiency is shown to be related with impaired wound bone healing in rats. Therefore, special wound care formulas containing boron may have some positive effect on wound healing of the patients with diabetic foot ulcers.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse led intervention for high risk patients with diabetic foot ulceration and/or amputation. The effectiveness is defined in two ways 1) as a reduction in complication rates (time till ulceration recurrence, new ulcerations, amputation or reamputation) and 2) as a reduction in hospital readmissions for foot-related complication (one year survival probability: failure = readmission for ulceration recurrence, new ulcerations, amputation or re-amputation).
Diabetic foot ulcer is one of the refractory wounds and always poses many challenges in clinical practice. This study was conducted to have a prospective, randomised, controlled study compare the safety and efficacy of the autologous skin cell with skin graft (experiment group) with split-thickness skin graft (STSG, control group) alone on treating diabetic foot ulcers.
This study aimed to investigate the effect of low intensity cathodal direct current on the release of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and nitric oxide (NO) in diabetic foot ulceration.
This is a 2 part study to assess the safety and efficacy of a nitric oxide (NOx) generating dressing on chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). Nitric oxide has a range of effects on the body including vasodilation and angiogenesis. It is also a potent antimicrobial. This 140 patient, randomised, controlled clinical study will assess the ability of a simple 2 part, NOx generating dressing to increase blood flow in DFUs and to improve healing in chronic DFUs compared to standard of care.
The study will compare treatment with DermACELL to conventional care in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and venous stasis ulcers (VSU).
The purpose of this reseach study is to determine Mölnlycke Health Care´s Leia dressing performance properties is fulfilled and that the dressing is safe when used on wound types such as pressure ulcer, leg ulcer, and diabetic foot ulcer.