View clinical trials related to Diabetic Foot Ulcer.
Filter by:This is an initial dose escalation safety and exploratory efficacy study to treat two groups of subjects with critically sized diabetic wounds and diabetic neuropathy using placental-derived stem cells (PDSC) transplanted by injection into soft tissues of the lower limb. Its primary objective is safety assessment and its secondary objective is determining optimum PDSC safe dose. Group 1 will receive implantation of cells in the ulcer, in the ulcer bed, and along the distal arterial vessels that supply blood to the foot. Group 2 will follow the same protocol for the foot but will have an additional dose of cells implanted in the anterior and posterior compartments of the same leg to determine the impact on peripheral neuropathy. Dose escalation and safety will be documented. Exploratory measures of efficacy include: ulcer healing, hemodynamic and anatomical effects on the arteries of the foot, and changes in the sensory perceptions of the foot.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the optimal frequency for sharp debridement in promoting the healing of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What is the comparative effect of weekly sharp debridement versus biweekly sharp debridement in combination with conventional treatment on granulation tissue and healing time in patients with DFUs? 2. What is the optimal modality or frequency of debridement based on the location of the DFU? Participants (ulcerated diabetic patients) will: - Undergo sharp debridement on a weekly basis (Group A). - Undergo sharp debridement on a biweekly basis (Group B). Researchers will compare Group A (weekly sharp debridement) with Group B (biweekly sharp debridement ) to see if the frequency of sharp debridement has a significant effect on granulation tissue and healing time in diabetic foot ulcers. In each group, there will be patients with ulcers in different locations (toes, metatarsal heads, and midfoot/hindfoot) to assess the effect of debridement based on the lesion location
The aim of this observational study is to investigate the effects of the type, area and duration of ulceration on jaw pain, mandibular function limitation, TMD and swallowing in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers.The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does the change in foot structure due to diabetic foot ulcer have an effect on the temporomandibular jointand swalloving? - What are the determinants of tempomandibular dysfunction in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers? Participants (both groups) will be evaluated for quality of life, jaw functionality, mandibular dysfunction, oropharyngeal swallowing disorder, pain and diabetes complications.
Background: People with diabetes and either current or previous diabetic foot ulcer disease (DFUD) are at very high risk for adverse cardiovascular events including heart attacks and strokes. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a class of medications that have shown to be very effective in reducing heart disease and event risk. However, one recent study found that SGLT2i's may increase minor amputation risk in those with DFUD, though this finding has not been replicated in other similar studies. However, as a result, there has been limited further investigation into this issue and as such the use of SGLT2i's in those with DFUD remains a contentious issue, despite their potential for significantly reducing cardiovascular disease risk in this population. In the absence of further randomised controlled trials investigating the use of SGLT2is in these populations, there is a need for clinical guidelines advising on their use based on expert clinical consensus, including specific criteria or scenarios in which they should or should not be used. The Delphi methodology is an iterative survey technique that uses expert opinion from various relevant backgrounds and experiences to generate a consensus based upon various statements and/or scenarios. Aim: The aim of this study is to use the Delphi technique to generate expert consensus-based clinical guidelines on the use of SGLT2i's in those with diabetes and DFUD. Methods: This is a Delphi technique-based study using a purposive sample of convenience. Consensus development methods will be used to generate clinical guidelines, endorsed by key clinical groups, on the use of SGLT2i's in patients with diabetic foot ulcer disease, including acknowledgement of specific scenarios or patient characteristics that may influence these guidelines. The consensus group will consist of n=20 healthcare practitioners, including GPs, secondary care diabetologists, foot care specialists, cardiologists and pharmacists in order to ensure a breadth of expertise and input. Two rounds of the Delphi consensus process will take place, in order to iteratively develop the consensus-based clinical guidelines. This process is expected to take 4-6 months. The analysis will be on-going throughout the study and completed within 3 months of the last questionnaire round of the Delphi process.
The goal of this clinical pilot is to collect patient outcome data on a commercially available, keratin-based skin substitute matrix: ProgenaMatrix®. In this trial, two groups of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) will be randomized to receive treatment with ProgenaMatrix applied either weekly or bi-weekly to the target wound. Researchers will compare how weekly or bi-weekly application of ProgenaMatrix affects the healing of DFUs. The primary questions to be answered are: 1. How many patients achieve wound closure in 12 weeks with ProgenaMatrix treatment? And 2. What is the change in wound area during the trial in each group?
A randomised controlled investigation comparing the clinical performance and cost effectiveness of Biatain® Silicone with Standard of Care dressing including filler in chronic wounds (CP351 - BISIL Study) This study (BISIL) will compare the Biatain® Silicone dressing to commonly used wound care products (AQUACEL®EXTRATM Hydrofiber® Dressing used with Mepilex® Border). The study will recruit in total 100 adult subjects with a venous leg ulcer or a diabetic foot ulcer no deeper than 2cm. Only ulcers with a duration of at least 8 weeks but no longer than a year will be included. The study will be a randomised controlled trial where half of the participants will use Biatain® Silicone and half will use the comparator for 4 weeks. Each participant will be in the study for 4-5 weeks during which there will be a weekly visit with the study team to complete the study assessments and change the dressing. The study will run for approximately one year, starting in January 2023.
The aim of this clinical investigation is to collect skin lesion area data for the comparison of the agreement among the results obtained between the following three wound area measurement methods: - Ruler using the Kundin method, - Investigational software Clinicgram Euclides - Digital planimetry with Adobe Photoshop The clinical data retrieved in this study will allow the clinical validation of the safety and safety of the investigation software Clinicgram Euclides.
A Prospective, Non-Randomized, Multi-Center Observational Study To determine the safety and effectiveness of InnovaMatrix AC porcine placental ECM therapy for the treatment of chronic, non-healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) Eligible subjects will be treated with a weekly application of sterilized, porcine placental ECM followed by standard of care wound therapy and offloading
We propose a randomized controlled study to assess the efficacy of: 1. Platelet-lysate loaded sustained release thermo-gelling formulation (Platelets-SR) 2. EPO/ISDN/UFH cryogel dressing (Trigel) As adjuncts to standard-of-care (SOC) in the treatment of chronic DFUs compared to SOC alone for patients attending the DFU outpatient clinic at the Gastroenterology Centre, Mansoura University.
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the impact that the NanoSALV wound dressing can have on managing severe chronic wounds and feasibility for patients, providers, and health systems in different health care settings (community care, continuing care and in-patient care). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What is the cost-savings of using NanoSALV? 2. Do care providers perceive NanoSALV to be better, worse or the same as the standard of care in terms of usability and efficiency? 3. Does NanoSALV increase autonomy and competence of wound self-management for care providers/patients? 4. Were patients more satisfied, less satisfied or just as satisfied with NanoSALV compared to the standard of Care? 5. Does NanoSALV reduce healing time for chronic wounds compared to standard of care? The sequence and duration of the trial is as follows: - Required data will be collected at enrollment to provide a baseline (Day 0) measure. - The patient will receive standard of care treatment for four weeks with dressing changes as per the standard care pathway. - In the following four weeks the patient will receive the NanoSALV dressing treatment and dressing changes done every 48 - 72 hours as required. - Wound assessments will be done weekly with wound images captured by Aranz Medical's Silhouette Star 3D medical camera that digitally takes measurements. - A patient satisfaction survey will be collected post-control and post-intervention periods - One week after completing the study the patient/surrogate will be contacted or a survey link will be sent to them regarding adverse events and to see what wound dressing they continued to use. Semi-structured interviews and observations will be done with care providers/patients and healthcare professionals in the control period to explore the perspectives on the current state of chronic wound management, and in the intervention period to evaluate the perceptions on the usability of the intervention.