View clinical trials related to Diabetic Foot Infection.
Filter by:This will be a prospective, open-label, two-center study to assess the safety of omadacycline use in the treatment of hospitalized subjects with moderate to severe DFI with or without Acute osteomyelitis (AOM) who are at a high risk for development of CDI, AKI, and/or resistant pathogens compared to retrospective controls. Prospective enrollment will be continued until the sample size is achieved up to one year from start date (October 2020). Secondary to slower than anticipated enrollment due to the COVID-19 pandemic and initial exclusion of AOM, following protocol amendment, patient enrollment will be continued until the sample size is achieved up to 18 months from amendment approval (anticipate April 2022 - October 2023). A historical matched case cohort (standard of care) at the two hospitals based on ICD10 codes associated with DFI [E11.(621, 622), E10.(621, 622); L97.(509, 521, 522, 523, 524, 529)], including subjects with AOM [M86.(08-09, 10, 16-19, 8X0, 8X7-8X9, 9) will be utilized for comparison.
It is hypothesized that application at 4-week or greater intervals of the human placental umbilical cord tissue TTAX01 to the surface of a well debrided, complex diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) will, with concomitant management of infection, result in a higher rate of wounds showing complete healing within 25 weeks of initiating therapy, compared with standard care alone. This second confirmatory Phase 3 study examines a population of diabetic foot ulcer patients having adequate perfusion, with or without neuropathy, and a high suspicion of associated osteomyelitis in a complex, high grade wound.
The objective of this study is to determine if patients with lower extremity wounds in rural communities who undergo specialty referral through telemedicine have expedited care compared to patients who are treated through standard in person referral.
Work Package 1: Observational cohort pilot safety study Work Package 2: Randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled pilot study Work Package 3: Observer-blind pilot RCT
To explore the microbial differences of diabetic foot osteomyelitis and osteomyelitis without diabetes.
It is hypothesized that application at 4-week or greater intervals of the human placental umbilical cord tissue TTAX01 to the surface of a well debrided, complex diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) will, with concomitant management of infection, will result in a higher rate of wounds showing complete healing within 26 weeks of initiating therapy, compared with standard care alone. This confirmatory Phase 3 study examines a population of diabetic foot ulcer patients having adequate perfusion, with or without neuropathy, and a high suspicion of associated osteomyelitis in a complex, high grade wound.
Patients who are admitted to hospital with serious infections, such as those in bone, joints or spine, require a long course of intravenous (IV) antibiotics. After an initial treatment course in hospital or through a dedicated outpatient antibiotic program many patients can complete their treatment course at home. Such infections are often caused by bacteria called Staphylococci, and currently there are three antibiotic options used routinely. A fourth antibiotic, ceftriaxone, is a promising alternative; it is also effective against Staphylococci, and is more convenient, less costly and easier to give at home, however, it has not been studied thoroughly in a prospective manner. This study will compare ceftriaxone to routinely used antibiotics (cloxacillin, cefazolin or daptomycin) to see if ceftriaxone is equally as safe and efficacious in curing deep-seated Staphylococcal infections in patients receiving home IV antibiotics. Patients with deep-seated infections caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or coagulase-negative Staphylococcal species will be randomly assigned home IV treatment with ceftriaxone OR one of the three other antibiotics before leaving the hospital. Patients will then receive usual care from an Infectious Disease physician and Home IV team. The study team will assess whether cure has been achieved by the end of the IV treatment, follow-up at 6 months to see if patients remain infection-free, and record any side-effects of treatment. The overall goal is to determine whether ceftriaxone can be considered non-inferior to usual antibiotic treatment in treating Staphylococcal infections in a home IV setting.
Diabetic foot problems, especially infections (DFI), require multiple resources including iterative surgeries and amputations, long-lasting antibiotic therapies, education, off-loading and eventually revascularization and appropriate foot-ware. Treatment is complicated, multidisciplinary, and marked with a high risk of recurrences. This is a retrospective and prospective cohort with side studies of pathologies and academic research questions that cannot be separated from each other. The investigators establish a retro-and prospective cohort of diabetic foot problems (ambulatory and hospitalized patients) and perform side studies to reduce the incidence of complications, and to reduce recurrences of DFI, cost and adverse events related to therapies. Cohort: Prospective and retrospective cohort of all diabetic foot problems with emphasis on surgical and infectious variables. Trial 1 (Randomized trial on residual infection after amputation): Determination of the level of amputation per MRI followed by a randomization concerning the duration of post-amputation systemic antibiotic therapy, if there is residual bone infection. Trial 2 (Randomized trial on infection without amputation): Determination of the duration of systemic antibiotic therapy in diabetic foot infections without Amputation of the infection.
This study will establish whether human and bacterial protease activity can aid therapeutic decision-making, including targeted treatments.
Diabetic foot osteomyelitis is a common and serious complication of diabetes. While the diagnosis of soft tissue infection can be made with simple physical examination in most cases, bone involvement can be harder to diagnose, often requiring medical imaging. In addition to conventional radiological examinations (x-ray and MRI) nuclear medicine procedures can also provide important physiological information in these patients. These procedures include triple phase bone scan combined with Gallium scintigraphy or a combination of labelled leukocyte scintigraphy and bone marrow scintigraphy using sulfur colloid. These procedure, while they provide useful physiological information, are time consuming, generally requiring at least 2 separate image acquisition on separate days, and can be costly. 18F-FDG is a glucose analog that can be used for PET imaging. In addition to its application in oncology, the literature has shown that FDG can be used to investigate a wide variety of inflammatory and infectious conditions, including diabetic foot infections. The aim of this study is to compare the usefulness of FDG PET imaging versus "conventional" nuclear medicine (either bone scan and Gallium scintigraphy or labelled leukocytes and sulfur colloid scintigraphy) in patient with suspected diabetic foot osteomyelitis.