Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05434754
Other study ID # 3986
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 16, 2022
Est. completion date June 2025

Study information

Verified date August 2023
Source The Hospital for Sick Children
Contact Rayzel Shulman, MD, PhD
Phone 416-813-6218
Email rayzel.shulman@sickkids.ca
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

We are testing the effectiveness of an eHealth digital tool co-designed with patients and providers to improve diabetes self-efficacy in young adults as they transition to adult type 1 diabetes care.


Description:

The intervention is an eHealth digital solution co-designed with patients and providers. The intervention is a text message based algorithm that operates similar to a chatbot and will send SMS messages to participants in the experimental arm, consisting of T1D personalized support, education, resources, and a collection of outcome measures. Participants in the control arm will also be onboarded to the KiT algorithm but will only receive text-messages asking them to complete outcome measures at baseline, 6 and 12 months -- all outcome measures will be URL linkouts to REDCap surveys, housed on the SickKids REDCap servers. An embedded process evaluation of high and low engagers will also be conducted to understand how and why the intervention achieved or failed to achieve the desired effects.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 183
Est. completion date June 2025
Est. primary completion date June 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 17 Years to 18 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, ascertained from patient's medical chart 2. Receiving out-patient care for T1D at a pediatric diabetes center participating in this study 3. Is within 6 months of either planned transfer or 18th birthday so research coordinator can approach patient and inform them about the study, and then can be re-approached for consenting and enrollment only within 3-4 months of either: planned transfer to adult diabetes care OR 18th birthday 4. Proficient in written and spoken English or French 5. Possession of their own personal mobile device that can support SMS with sufficient capacity to send and receive SMS/texts 6. Valid and working mobile phone number 7. Valid email address 8. Willing to engage with intervention if randomized to intervention arm 9. Willing to complete study outcome measures (questionnaires) at all study time-points regardless of which arm they are randomized to: baseline, 6 months, and 12 months 10. Willing to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: 1. Unable to carry out their diabetes care independently due to an intellectual or neurocognitive disability; discerned from medical chart during pre-screening 2. Non-resident of Ontario or Quebec 3. Planning to move out of either province in the next 6-12 months and after moving, will not be receiving diabetes care in either province and/or will not have a valid and working mobile number 4. Currently enrolled in any other clinical research trial with an SMS-based intervention 5. Currently enrolled in another diabetes intervention trial that will continue beyond the final pediatric diabetes visit

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
eHealth Tool
text messaging algorithm

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Oak Valley Health Markham Ontario
Canada Trillium Health Partners Mississauga Ontario
Canada McGill University Health Center Montréal Quebec
Canada Saint Justine Hospital Montréal Quebec
Canada Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Ottawa Ontario
Canada The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
The Hospital for Sick Children Trillium Health Partners, University Health Network, Toronto

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Evaluation of participant engagement with the intervention with number of participants who are engaging with intervention messages Embedded process evaluation using real-time engagement metrics with number of participants who are engaging with intervention messages on Concurrent process evaluation allows for real-time intervention modification to increase and improve user engagement and content delivery 12 months
Other Evaluation of participant engagement with the intervention looking at which types of messages are the most and least engaged with Embedded process evaluation using real-time engagement metrics looking at which types of messages are the most and least engaged with Concurrent process evaluation allows for real-time intervention modification to increase and improve user engagement and content delivery 12 months
Other Evaluation of intervention fidelity Embedded process evaluation using real-time engagement metrics (i.e. number of participants who are engaging with intervention messages on and which types of messages are the most and least engaged with) Concurrent process evaluation allows for real-time intervention modification to increase and improve user engagement and content delivery 12 months
Primary To test the effect of a text message-based T1D transition intervention compared to control at 12 months in the Self-Efficacy for Diabetes management scale. A higher score indicates better self-efficacy. The primary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a text message-based T1D transition intervention that will personalize transition education and support, as an adjunct to usual T1D transition care versus usual transition care alone on a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) called the Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Management (SEDM) scale, measured at 12 months after enrollment in the study. The SEDM has scale from 1-10 where 1 denotes 'not at all sure' and 10 denotes 'completely sure' where higher scores mean better outcomes. Minimal clinically important difference is 10%. 12 months
Secondary Compare text message-based T1D transition intervention to control at 6 months in the Self-Efficacy for Diabetes management scale. Higher score indicates better self efficacy. A secondary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a text message-based T1D transition intervention that will personalize transition education and support, as an adjunct to usual T1D transition care versus usual transition care alone on a patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) called the Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Management (SEDM) scale, measured at 6 months.
The SEDM has scale from 1-10 where 1 denotes 'not at all sure' and 10 denotes 'completely sure' where higher scores mean better outcomes.
Minimal clinically important difference is 10%.
6 months
Secondary To compare diabetes self-efficacy in the intervention vs. control group at baseline. A higher score indicates better self efficacy. The Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Management (SEDM) scale will be used to measure diabetes self-efficacy at baseline. The SEDM has scale from 1-10 where 1 denotes 'not at all sure' and 10 denotes 'completely sure' where higher scores mean better outcomes.
Minimal clinically important difference is 10%.
Baseline
Secondary Evaluate the impact of this text message-based intervention compared to usual care at 12 months using the Readiness Assessment of Emerging Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosed in Youth (READDY) Tool. Higher scores indicating more confidence • transition readiness measured by the Readiness Assessment of Emerging Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosed in Youth (READDY) tool at 12 months; READDY is a transition readiness assessment for emerging adults with diabetes diagnosed in youth. The READDY tool assesses diabetes-related knowledge or skill items by querying respondents on 42 total items split into 5 domains: knowledge, navigation, health behaviors, and insulin pump skills. Respondents answer on a Likert scale from "yes, I can do this" scored 5 to "Haven't thought about it" scored 1; confidence level is evaluated in each domain with a higher score indicating more confidence 12 months
Secondary Evaluate the impact of this text message-based intervention compared to usual care at 6 months using the Readiness Assessment of Emerging Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosed in Youth (READDY) Tool. Higher scores indicating more confidence • transition readiness measured by the Readiness Assessment of Emerging Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosed in Youth (READDY) tool at 6 months; READDY is a transition readiness assessment for emerging adults with diabetes diagnosed in youth. The READDY tool assesses diabetes-related knowledge or skill items by querying respondents on 42 total items split into 5 domains: knowledge, navigation, health behaviors, and insulin pump skills. Respondents answer on a Likert scale from "yes, I can do this" scored 5 to "Haven't thought about it" scored 1; confidence level is evaluated in each domain with a higher score indicating more confidence 6 months
Secondary To compare transition readiness in the intervention and control groups at baseline using the Readiness Assessment of Emerging Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosed in Youth (READDY) Tool. Higher scores indicating more confidence • transition readiness measured by the Readiness Assessment of Emerging Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosed in Youth (READDY) tool at baseline. READDY is a transition readiness assessment for emerging adults with diabetes diagnosed in youth. The READDY tool assesses diabetes-related knowledge or skill items by querying respondents on 42 total items split into 5 domains: knowledge, navigation, health behaviors, and insulin pump skills. Respondents answer on a Likert scale from "yes, I can do this" scored 5 to "Haven't thought about it" scored 1; confidence level is evaluated in each domain with a higher score indicating more confidence Baseline
Secondary Evaluate the impact of this text message-based intervention compared to usual care at 12 months on self-reported Barriers to Diabetes Adherence in Adolescence questionnaire (BDA) Stigma subscale • perceived stigma of living with T1D using the Barriers to Diabetes Adherence in Adolescence questionnaire (BDA) Stigma Subscale; in our study, stigma will be defined as an affirmative response to at least one of three key items on this subscale. The scale ranges from "not at all true" (1) to "completely true" (5). Where a score greater than 2 to at least 1 of 3 key items indicates stigma. 12 months
Secondary Evaluate the impact of this text message-based intervention compared to usual care at 6 months on self-reported Barriers to Diabetes Adherence in Adolescence questionnaire (BDA) Stigma subscale • perceived stigma of living with T1D using the Barriers to Diabetes Adherence in Adolescence questionnaire (BDA) Stigma Subscale; in our study, stigma will be defined as an affirmative response to at least one of three key items on this subscale. The scale ranges from "not at all true" (1) to "completely true" (5). Where a score greater than 2 to at least 1 of 3 key items indicates stigma. 6 months
Secondary To compared perceived stigma of living with T1D between the intervention and control groups at baseline using the self-reported Barriers to Diabetes Adherence in Adolescence questionnaire (BDA) Stigma subscale • perceived stigma of living with T1D using the Barriers to Diabetes Adherence in Adolescence questionnaire (BDA) Stigma Subscale; in our study, stigma will be defined as an affirmative response to at least one of three key items on this subscale. The scale ranges from "not at all true" (1) to "completely true" (5). Where a score greater than 2 to at least 1 of 3 key items indicates stigma. baseline
Secondary Evaluate the impact of this text message-based intervention compared to usual care at 12 months using self-reported A1c values • A1c will be self-reported in the following categories of values: < 7%, 7 to < 8%, 8 to < 9%, >9% where higher percentage indicates poorer diabetes management 12 months
Secondary Evaluate the impact of this text message-based intervention compared to usual care at 6 months using self-reported A1c A1c will be self-reported in the following categories of values: < 7%, 7 to < 8%, 8 to < 9%, >9% where higher percentage indicates poorer diabetes management 6 months
Secondary To compare A1c between the intervention and control groups at baseline by measuring self-reported A1c A1c will be self-reported in the following categories of values: < 7%, 7 to < 8%, 8 to < 9%, >9% where higher percentage indicates poorer diabetes management baseline
Secondary Evaluate the impact of this text message-based intervention compared to usual care on number of diabetes-related ED visits during the 12 months of intervention • Health administrative data from ICES in Ontario and RAMQ in Quebec will be collected during the 12 months of intervention. ICES is an independent, not-for-profit research institute made up of a community of research, data and clinical experts in Ontario. RAMQ manages, administers and publishes health data in the province of Quebec. 12 months
Secondary To compare the number of diabetes-related ED visits in the 24 months prior to enrolment in the intervention vs. control group at baseline • Health administrative data from ICES in Ontario and RAMQ in Quebec will be collected during the 24 months prior to enrolment. ICES is an independent, not-for-profit research institute made up of a community of research, data and clinical experts in Ontario. RAMQ manages, administers and publishes health data in the province of Quebec. baseline
Secondary Evaluate the impact of this text message-based intervention compared to usual care on number of diabetes-related hospitalizations and length of diabetes-related hospitalizations during the 12 months of intervention • Health administrative data from ICES in Ontario and RAMQ in Quebec will be collected during the 12 months of intervention. ICES is an independent, not-for-profit research institute made up of a community of research, data and clinical experts in Ontario. RAMQ manages, administers and publishes health data in the province of Quebec. 12 months
Secondary Number of diabetes-related hospitalizations and length of diabetes-related hospitalizations 24 months prior to intervention for both intervention and control populations to describe baseline characteristics • Health administrative data from ICES in Ontario and RAMQ in Quebec will be collected during the 24 months prior to enrolment. ICES is an independent, not-for-profit research institute made up of a community of research, data and clinical experts in Ontario. RAMQ manages, administers and publishes health data in the province of Quebec. Baseline
Secondary Evaluate the impact of this text message-based intervention compared to usual care on number of diabetes-related physician visits during the 12 months of intervention • Health administrative data from ICES in Ontario and RAMQ in Quebec will be collected during the 12 months of intervention. ICES is an independent, not-for-profit research institute made up of a community of research, data and clinical experts in Ontario. RAMQ manages, administers and publishes health data in the province of Quebec. 12 months
Secondary Number of diabetes-related physician visits at baseline for both intervention and control populations 24 months prior to describe baseline characteristics • Health administrative data from ICES in Ontario and RAMQ in Quebec will be collected during the 24 months prior to enrolment. ICES is an independent, not-for-profit research institute made up of a community of research, data and clinical experts in Ontario. RAMQ manages, administers and publishes health data in the province of Quebec. Baseline
Secondary Evaluate the impact of this text message-based intervention compared to usual care on number of diabetes drug and devices claims during the 12 months of intervention • Health administrative data from ICES in Ontario and RAMQ in Quebec will be collected during the 12 months of intervention. ICES is an independent, not-for-profit research institute made up of a community of research, data and clinical experts in Ontario. RAMQ manages, administers and publishes health data in the province of Quebec. 12 months
Secondary Number of diabetes drug and devices claims 24 months prior to enrolment to describe baseline characteristics • Health administrative data from ICES in Ontario and RAMQ in Quebec will be collected during the 24 months prior to enrolment. ICES is an independent, not-for-profit research institute made up of a community of research, data and clinical experts in Ontario. RAMQ manages, administers and publishes health data in the province of Quebec. Baseline
Secondary Evaluate the impact of this text message-based intervention costs compared to usual care costs Costs of implementation will be collected to ascertain the cost of developing and using this intervention in a hospital setting in Ontario and Quebec; variables that will be collected for this analysis will include: salaries for staff working on the design, development and management of the intervention for the entire intervention duration; salary of research coordinators working to onboard participants to the intervention; cost of digital services and office equipment needed to develop and manage the intervention (computers, hosting service, servers); cost of REDcap servers and hospital IT support for REDCap integration with MEMOTEXT platform
Aggregate and direct medical costs associated with the intervention and its implementation will be measured for the 12 months of the intervention duration using study and administrative data
12 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04030091 - Pulsatile Insulin Infusion Therapy in Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Phase 4
Terminated NCT03605329 - Evaluation of the Severity of Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy in Type 1 Diabetic Patients With OSAS N/A
Completed NCT01696266 - An International Survey on Hypoglycaemia Among Insulin-treated Patients With Diabetes
Recruiting NCT06050642 - Study of the Impact of PROximity Support for Patients With Type 1 DIABetes Treated With an Insulin Pump or Closed Loop. N/A
Completed NCT05107544 - Metabolic, Physical Fitness and Mental Health Effects of High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes N/A
Recruiting NCT04443153 - Adapting Diabetes Treatment Expert Systems to Patient in Type 1 Diabetes N/A
Completed NCT04569994 - A Study to Look at the Safety of NNC0363-0845 in Healthy People and People With Type 1 Diabetes Phase 1
Completed NCT04521634 - Glycaemic Variability in Acute Stroke
Completed NCT04089462 - Effects of Frequency and Duration of Exercise in People With Type 1 Diabetes A Randomized Crossover Study N/A
Completed NCT03143816 - Study Comparing Prandial Insulin Aspart vs. Technosphere Insulin in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes on Multiple Daily Injections: Investigator-Initiated A Real-life Pilot Study-STAT Study Phase 4
Completed NCT01892319 - An International Non-interventional Cohort Study to Evaluate the Safety of Treatment With Insulin Detemir in Pregnant Women With Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Pregnancy Registry
Recruiting NCT04039763 - RT-CGM in Young Adults at Risk of DKA N/A
Completed NCT04042207 - Diabeloop for Highly Unstable Type 1 Diabetes N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06068205 - COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MORPHO-MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF RED BLOOD CELLS EXTRACTED FROM DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS
Recruiting NCT05909800 - Prolonged Remission Induced by Phenofibrate in Children Newly Diagnosed With Type 1 Diabetes. Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04974528 - Afrezza® INHALE-1 Study in Pediatrics Phase 3
Completed NCT04530292 - Home Intervention and Social Precariousness in Childhood Diabetes N/A
Completed NCT05428943 - OPT101 in Type 1 Diabetes Patients Phase 1
Recruiting NCT03988764 - Monogenic Diabetes Misdiagnosed as Type 1
Completed NCT05597605 - The SHINE Study: Safety of Implant and Preliminary Performance of the SHINE SYSTEM in Diabetic Subjects N/A