Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Time in range (TIR) between 140 and 180 mg/dL [TIR (140-180)]- Change from Prior to Intervention, to Final Two Weeks of Intervention |
TIR (140 -180 mg/dL) between 6 am and 12 am (waking hours). |
Prior to Intervention (Week 0), and During Final 2 Weeks of Intervention (Week 13 or 14) |
|
Secondary |
Waist Circumference- Change from Enrollment Visit to Study Conclusion Visit |
Changes in waist circumference |
At Enrollment Visit and at 14 weeks from Enrollment Visit |
|
Secondary |
Blood Pressure- Diastolic and Systolic- Change from Enrollment Visit to Study Conclusion Visit |
Changes in blood pressure |
At Enrollment visit and at 14 weeks from Enrollment Visit |
|
Secondary |
HbA1c- Change from Enrollment Visit to Study Conclusion Visit |
Changes in HbA1c |
At Enrollment Visit and at 14 weeks from Enrollment Visit |
|
Secondary |
Insulin resistance- Change from Enrollment Visit to Study Conclusion Visit |
Changes in Insulin Resistance |
At Enrollment visit and at 14 weeks from enrollment visit |
|
Secondary |
Lipids- Change from Enrollment Visit to Study Conclusion Visit |
Changes in lipids |
At enrollment visit and at 14 weeks from enrollment visit |
|
Secondary |
Prescribed medicines for T2D and/or hypertension- Change from Enrollment Visit to Study Conclusion Visit |
Changes in prescribed medicines for T2D and/or hypertension |
At enrollment visit and at 14 weeks from enrollment visit |
|
Secondary |
Self-reported sleep, mood, and pain via 100 mm Likert scale questionnaire- Change from Enrollment, and to Final Visit |
Changes in self-reported sleep, mood, and pain (Best to Worst) |
At enrollment visit, and at 14 weeks from enrollment visit |
|
Secondary |
Self-reported Food security via United States Dept. of Agriculture U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form - Change from Enrollment, and at Final Visit |
Changes in Food Security |
At enrollment visit, and at 14 weeks from enrollment visit |
|
Secondary |
Depression via the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) |
Change in depression score (0-42), with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression |
At enrollment visit, and at 14 weeks from enrollment visit |
|
Secondary |
Anxiety via the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) |
Change in anxiety score (0-42), with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety |
At enrollment visit, and at 14 weeks from enrollment visit |
|
Secondary |
Stress via the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) |
Change in stress score (0-42), with higher scores indicating higher levels of stress |
At enrollment visit, and at 14 weeks from enrollment visit |
|
Secondary |
Change in Eating Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES) score |
Change in Eating Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES) mean score (25-175), with higher scores indicating lower eating self-efficacy. |
Prior to intervention (Week 0), and during final 2 weeks of intervention (Week 13 or 14) |
|
Secondary |
Change in Self-Report Habit Index (SRHI) score |
Change in Self-Report Habit Index (SRHI) mean score (1-7), with higher scores indicating stronger habits. |
Prior to intervention (Week 0), and during final 2 weeks of intervention (Week 13 or 14) |
|
Secondary |
Change in Self-Regulation of Eating Questionnaire (SREBQ) score |
Change in Self-Regulation of Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (SREBQ) mean score (1-5), with higher scores indicating better self-regulation of eating behavior. |
Prior to intervention (Week 0), and during final 2 weeks of intervention (Week 13 or 14) |
|
Secondary |
Physical Activity- Daily step count, Changes from first to final Fitbit application |
Physical Activity- Daily step count averaged over =14 days, Change from first Fitbit application (pre-intervention) to second Fitbit application (in final 14 days of intervention). |
First Fitbit application (pre-intervention) to second Fitbit application (in final 14 days of intervention) |
|
Secondary |
Sleep Duration |
Change in Sleep Duration (in minutes) averaged over =14 days |
First Fitbit application (pre-intervention) to second Fitbit application (in final 14 days of intervention) |
|
Secondary |
Secondary Continuous Glucose Monitoring Endpoints- Time in Range (TIR) 140-180 mg/dl, Waking Hours |
Change in TIR between 140 and 180 mg/dL [TIR (140-180)] between 6 am and 12 am (waking hours), averaged over =14 days from first CGM application (pre-intervention) to second CGM application (in final 14 days of intervention). |
first CGM application (pre-intervention) to second CGM application (in final 14 days of intervention). |
|
Secondary |
Secondary Continuous Glucose Monitoring Endpoints- Average Glucose |
Change in Average Glucose averaged over =14 days from first CGM application (pre-intervention) to second CGM application (in final 14 days of intervention). |
first CGM application (pre-intervention) to second CGM application (in final 14 days of intervention). |
|
Secondary |
Secondary Continuous Glucose Monitoring Endpoints- Time in Range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL |
Change in TIR 70-180 mg/dL averaged over =14 days from first CGM application (pre-intervention) to second CGM application (in final 14 days of intervention). |
first CGM application (pre-intervention) to second CGM application (in final 14 days of intervention). |
|
Secondary |
Secondary Continuous Glucose Monitoring Endpoints- Time >180 mg/dL |
Change in time >180 mg/dL averaged over =14 days from first CGM application (pre-intervention) to second CGM application (in final 14 days of intervention). |
first CGM application (pre-intervention) to second CGM application (in final 14 days of intervention). |
|
Secondary |
Secondary Continuous Glucose Monitoring Endpoints- Time <70 mg/dL |
Change in time <70 mg/dL averaged over =14 days from first CGM application (pre-intervention) to second CGM application (in final 14 days of intervention). |
first CGM application (pre-intervention) to second CGM application (in final 14 days of intervention). |
|
Secondary |
Adherence to the intervention |
Adherence to the intervention as measured via the daily avocado consumption log (DACL) |
12-week intervention monitoring period running weeks 2-14 |
|
Secondary |
Acceptability of the intervention |
Acceptability of the intervention as measured by the weekly avocado acceptability questionnaire (WAAQ) |
12-week intervention monitoring period running weeks 2-14 |
|
Secondary |
Regression analysis between avocado adherence measured as an average number of avocados consumed as reported via the daily avocado consumption log (DACL) and personality traits assessed via the Mini International Personality Item Tool. |
Each participant will fill out the Mini International Personality Item Tool (Mini-IPIP) at the start of the study. It comprises 20 items and assesses the five personality factors (Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Imagination). Scoring includes computing the mean score for each factor with a value ranging from 1 to 5 (very inaccurate to very accurate). Avocado adherence measured as the mean of the number of avocados consumed as reported via the daily avocado consumption log (DACL) will be computed. A regression analysis will be performed between the mean of the number of avocados consumed as the response variable and the five personality factors scores as the predictor variables. The coefficients of the regression analysis will be studied to evaluate if personality traits can predict avocado adherence. |
Average over 12 weeks |
|
Secondary |
Regression analysis between the average number of avocados consumed as reported via the daily avocado consumption log (DACL) and motives underlying the selection of food assessed by the Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) |
Each participant will fill out the Food Choice Questionnaire at the start of the study. It comprises 36 items and assesses the importance of 9 types of motives underlying food selection (Health, Mood, Convenience, Sensory Appeal, Natural Content, Price, Weight Control, Familiarity and Ethical Concern). Scoring includes computing the mean score for each type of motive ranging from 1-4 with higher values indicating higher importance. Avocado adherence measured as the mean of the number of avocados consumed as reported via the daily avocado consumption log (DACL) will be computed. A regression analysis will be performed between the mean of the number of avocados consumed as the response variable and the scores of the 9 types of motives underlying food selection as the predictor variables. The coefficients of the regression analysis will be studied to evaluate if food choice motives can predict avocado adherence. |
Average over 12 weeks |
|
Secondary |
Regression analysis between average composite acceptability score on the weekly Avocado Acceptability Questionnaire and Personality traits assessed via the Mini International Personality Item Tool. |
Each participant will fill out the Mini International Personality Item Tool at the start of the study. It comprises 20 items and assesses the five personality factors (Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Imagination). Scoring includes computing the mean score for each factor with a value ranging from 1 to 5 (very inaccurate to very accurate). The mean of the composite acceptability score on the weekly Avocado Acceptability Questionnaire (average taken over 12 weeks) will be computed. A regression analysis will be performed between the mean of the composite acceptability score as the response variable and the five personality factors scores as the predictor variables. The coefficients of the regression analysis will be studied to evaluate if personality traits can predict acceptability score. |
Average over 12 weeks |
|
Secondary |
Regression analysis between average composite acceptability score on the weekly Avocado Acceptability Questionnaire and motives underlying the selection of food assessed by the Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) |
Each participant will fill out the Food Choice Questionnaire at the start of the study. It comprises 36 items and assesses the importance of 9 types of motives underlying food selection (Health, Mood, Convenience, Sensory Appeal, Natural Content, Price, Weight Control, Familiarity, and Ethical Concern). Scoring includes computing the mean score for each type of motive ranging from 1-4 with higher values indicating higher importance. The mean of the composite acceptability score on the weekly Avocado Acceptability Questionnaire (average taken over 12 weeks) will be computed. A regression analysis will be performed between the mean of the composite acceptability score as the response variable and the scores of the 9 types of motives underlying food selection as the predictor variables. The coefficients of the regression analysis will be studied to evaluate if food choice motives can predict acceptability score. |
Average over 12 weeks |
|