Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03995238 |
Other study ID # |
A3237-R |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
October 9, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
April 30, 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2024 |
Source |
VA Office of Research and Development |
Contact |
Cory L Christiansen, PhD |
Phone |
(303) 724-9101 |
Email |
Cory.Christiansen[@]va.gov |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The population of older Veterans with non-traumatic lower limb amputation is growing.
Following lower limb amputation, asymmetrical movements persist during walking and likely
contribute to disabling sequelae including secondary pain conditions, poor gait efficiency,
impaired physical function, and compromised skin integrity of the residual limb. This study
seeks to address chronic gait asymmetry by evaluating the efficacy of two error-manipulation
gait training programs to improve gait symmetry for Veterans with non-traumatic lower limb
amputation. Additional this study will evaluate the potential of error-manipulation training
programs to improve secondary measures of disability and residual limb skin health.
Ultimately, this study aims to improve conventional prosthetic rehabilitation for Veterans
with non-traumatic amputation through gait training programs based in motor learning
principles, resulting in improved gait symmetry and lower incidence of long-term disability
after non-traumatic lower limb amputation.
Description:
The focus of this study is to improve walking symmetry in order to optimize walking ability
and reduce disability for Veterans with non-traumatic lower limb amputation (LLA). Over 80%
of current LLAs are non-traumatic, resulting from complications of pathologies, such as
diabetes mellitus and peripheral artery disease. Despite current declines in total amputation
rate among Veterans, the population with non-traumatic LLA is growing. For example, from 2000
to 2004 the relative amputation rate decreased by 34%. However, due to an increase in the
number of Veterans with diabetes during the same period, the population of Veterans with
diabetes and initial LLA increased by 23%. Following LLA, excessive gait asymmetry is common.
Asymmetric gait characteristics are of critical importance as excessive asymmetry may
increase the severity of disability experienced by people with non-traumatic LLA and
contribute to secondary pain conditions (low back pain and osteoarthritis), poor gait
efficiency, declines in physical performance, and compromised skin integrity of the residual
limb. Compared to individuals with traumatic LLA, the poor gait performance of those with
non-traumatic LLA is further compounded by older age, lower premorbid function, presence of
comorbidities, frequent wound development, and delayed healing in the residual limb. While
improving gait symmetry is a goal of conventional prosthetic rehabilitation, persistence of
gait asymmetry for years after LLA highlights the ineffectiveness of current rehabilitation
practices in achieving this goal. As a means of improving gait symmetry, this study aims to
determine the efficacy of error-manipulation gait training using two approaches
(error-augmentation and error-correction) compared to current standard-of-care in a three-arm
randomized controlled trial. Error-manipulation gait training intervention will be delivered
in eight training sessions (2x/week, 4 weeks) with 54 Veterans (18 per intervention group, 18
in control group) who have non-traumatic, unilateral, transtibial LLA. It is unclear which,
if either, form of error-manipulation gait training is efficacious for improving persistent
gait symmetry in Veterans with non-traumatic LLA. Error-augmentation gait training is a
promising and novel intervention that involves exaggerating an existing movement error to
force the neuromuscular system to correct the error. While this form of gait training
improved gait symmetry in small studies of individuals with chronic stroke or traumatic
amputation, it has yet to be evaluated in older Veterans with non-traumatic LLA. In contrast,
error-correction training involves reducing movement errors by overcorrecting for asymmetry.
Both error-augmentation and error-correction gait training are based upon motor learning
principles of distributed practice, task specificity, and feedback. Each of these
error-manipulation interventions have potential advantages over traditional gait training
following LLA which involves repeated bouts of walking with minimal feedback on movement
quality and is often unsupervised. Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to determine
the efficacy of error-manipulation gait training to improve gait symmetry. A secondary aim is
to evaluate signals of efficacy for improved secondary measures of physical function. Lastly,
this study will explore changes to residual limb skin health and prosthesis socket fit
following error-manipulation gait training. The unique use of motor learning principles in
error-manipulation gait training to improve gait symmetry addresses the problem of chronic
gait asymmetry following non-traumatic LLA. The results of this study will advance
rehabilitation knowledge and provide necessary evidence for the clinical translation of gait
training protocols based in motor learning principles for the at-risk population of Veterans
with non-traumatic LLA.