View clinical trials related to Depressive Disorder, Major.
Filter by:This is a study with an Open-Label (OL) phase followed by a randomized, Double-Blind (DB), placebo-controlled phase to assess efficacy and safety of SAGE-217 on relapse prevention in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD).
To assess the safety and tolerability of long-term pimavanserin treatment in subjects with major depressive disorder and inadequate response to antidepressant treatment.
This is an add-on study to an existing multimodal neuroimaging study in MDD by investigating the acute effects of DLPFC tDCS on threat vigilance in 24-44 patients with MDD, as part of an open-label treatment intervention study. Behavioral and neural measures of threat vigilance will be taken acutely and investigated as predictors of subsequent treatment response to a four-week, fourteen-session DLPFC tDCS intervention, using a novel home-tDCS protocol. The design takes advantage of an existing rich set of candidate baseline behavioral, neural and molecular measures from the existing neuroimaging study, which could be used to predict treatment response to tDCS and thereby, aid future patient selection for clinical trials.
Biogenetic messages about the etiology of mental illness (e.g., the "chemical imbalance theory" of depression) are increasing but the impact that these have on decision-making and motivation is not yet clear. This study will evaluate the impact of biogenetic feedback on cognitive control and default-mode network functioning, as well as motivation for different psychiatric treatment modalities. Participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) will be instructed that they are being tested for genetic susceptibility to depression and will be randomized to receive feedback that they either do or do not have a genetic predisposition to depression. Before and after receiving this feedback, brain activity will be assessed using high-density electroencephalogram (EEG). The investigators hypothesize that those exposed to the genetic feedback condition will evidence heightened ruminative default mode network activity and perceive medications to be more effective than psychotherapy.
The objective of the proposed study is to examine the relationship between serum concentrations of HNK and changes in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Profile of Mood States (POMS), as well as glutamatergic/GABAergic response. To achieve these aims the investigators propose a double-blind, uncontrolled (no placebo, no healthy control subjects) study with several different doses of ketamine. The investigators will conduct MRI scans to measure Glu and GABA before and during the ketamine treatment.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the intermediate-term efficacy and tolerability of a multiple-dosing ketamine infusion paradigm for the treatment of medication-refractory major depressive disorder (MDD). We are using a two-phase design. The first phase is a 3-week double blind parallel design clinical trial comparing 6 infusions of ketamine compared to 6 infusions of midazolam in 24 adolescents with treatment resistant depression. The primary outcome of this phase will be Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS) score at Day 18. The second phase is a 6-month open phase in which patients who received midazolam and remain depressed with be offered open ketamine treatment (6 infusions over 3 weeks). All participants will be followed weekly for 6 months and tracked for time to relapse.
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a debilitating disease characterized by a depressed mood, diminished interests, impaired cognitive function and vegetative symptoms, such as disturbed sleep or appetite. MDD occurs about twice as often in women than it does in men and affects about 6% of the adult population worldwide each year. Standard symptoms scales like the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale or the Montgomery-asberg Depression Rating Scale, the Self-Report 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology were initially developed for the evaluation of a therapeutic intervention or a pharmacological treatment and are routinely used by clinicians in the assessment of Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) occurrence. In parallel, patient-reported outcomes have gained increasing importance and are widely recommended by health authorities in the assessment of depression. The same institutions insist on the collection of real-world data to provide clinicians with ecological measurements. It has been demonstrated that an early response to an AntiDepressant (AD) treatment can be seen as early as week 2 and is not related to a placebo-effect. While there is no consensus on the exact cut-off values, several factors emerge as early predictors of a later treatment response, such as: - Improvement in emotional processing of happy facial expressions after 1 week of treatment, - Circa 20% improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 item (HDRS-17) at week 2. The hypothesis is therefore that repeated, systematic and real-time, contextualized and multimodal collection of depressive symptoms from patients at home will establish a threshold score that can predict a subsequent response to their treatment. REDRESS was inspired by several standard depression scales used and recommended by the French Health Authority, augmented with digital active and passive activity monitoring, speech analysis and emotional processing assessment. Another important assumption is that honesty and willingness to disclose personal or embarrassing things will be best achievable via a digital solution. To test this assumption, the overall scores and each subscores on the REDRESS numerical scale will be compared in people with MDD showing adequate response to those showing insufficient response. The response to treatment at week 6 will be studied (end of Phase 1). Non-responders and responders to the first treatment round will be enrolled in a 6-week extension phase (Phase 2). Non-responders will receive another treatment course (Other AD, combination, etc.). Responders will just be followed up and will keep the same treatment. The REDRESS scores will be analysed in this population and will allow us to test the investigator's assumption in people with treatment resistant depression. This study will also allow to assess patients' quality of life at the end of each phase of treatment and to compare results with REDRESS scores.
This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of SAGE-217 compared to placebo in adult participants with comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD) and insomnia.
Individuals with Late Life Depression (LLD) often have cognitive problems, particularly problems with memory, attention, and problem solving, all of which contribute to antidepressant non-response. Our group and others have shown that decreased thinking speed is the central cause of functional problems in patients with LLD. Similarly, decreased walking speed is associated with depression and carries additional risk for falls, hospitalization, and death. Available evidence suggests that declining functionality in the brain's dopamine system contributes to age-related cognitive and motor slowing. The central hypothesis of this study is that by enhancing dopamine functioning in the brain and improving cognitive and motor slowing, administration of carbidopa/levodopa (L-DOPA) will improve depressive symptoms in older adults.
INTRODUCTION: There is strong evidence indicating the effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT) in the management of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and some clinical trials indicating physical exercise (PE) as an effective treatment for the disorder. However, few studies have evaluated the effect of group CBT or PE compared to wait-listing to receive treatment as usual (TAU) in the management of MDD. This study will evaluate and compare the effectiveness of: 1) group CBT plus wait-listing for TAU; versus 2) group PE plus wait-listing for TAU; versus 3) only wait-listing for TAU in management of MDD. The investigators hypothesize that participants with MDD assigned to the group CBT or PE (plus wait-listed for TAU) arms of the study will achieve superior outcomes compared to participants only wait-listed for TAU. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective rater-blinded randomized controlled trial assessing the benefits for participants with MDD. 120 patients with MDD referred to Addiction and Mental Health (AMH) clinics in Edmonton Zone who are informed about the study and consent to participate will be randomly assigned to one of the 3 arms of the study: 1) 40 participants wait-listed for TAU will receive weekly sessions of group CBT for 14 weeks; 2) 40 participants wait-listed for TAU will receive PE 3 times a week for 14 weeks; and 3) 40 participants will only be wait-listed for TAU. Participants will be assessed at enrollment, 3 and 6 months post enrolment, mid-treatment, and at treatment completion . Their assessments will cover primary outcomes including functional variables (relationships, well-being, physical activity) and symptom variables (changes in depressive symptoms scores). Secondary client outcomes will be service variables (e.g. patient compliance, retention in treatment, patient satisfaction). In addition, participants in the intervention groups will be evaluated weekly with one functional measure. The data will be analyzed using repeated measures and effect size analyses, and correlational analyses will be completed between measures at each time point. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (Hong Kong Amendment) and Good Clinical Practice (Canadian Guidelines). Written informed consent will be obtained from each subject. The study has received ethical clearance from Health Ethics Research Board of the University of Alberta (Ref. # Pro 00080975) and operational approval from the provincial health authority (AHS # 43638). The results will be disseminated at several levels, including patients, practitioners, academics/researchers, and healthcare organizations.