Depression Clinical Trial
Official title:
Readiness for E-mental Health- Awareness, Acceptance, and Preference Towards Technology-Mediated Mental Health Treatment Among Individuals With Elevated Depressive Symptoms in Hongkong: A Survey Study and Effect of Web-based Decision Aids on Preferences Shift
The goals of this study is as follow: 1. to understand the acceptability/perception of seeking E-mental health service versus other options for depression in Hong Kong, 2. to investigate the extent to which people preferring E-mental health service systemically differ from people preferring traditional face-to-face service, and the extent to which digital health interventions increase reach and access to groups who may less well served by traditional mental health services (e.g. people with financial difficulties, men with depression, people with high level of stigma. etc), and 3. to examine whether treatment preferences shift after receiving a clients' decision aids about psychotherapy in digital and in in-person format.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 200 |
Est. completion date | March 30, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | March 30, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Being 18 years of age or older; - With at least mild to moderate depressive symptoms (defined as having a cut-off score of 10 or above based on the PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9) - Being Chinese speaking Exclusion Criteria: • Self-reported mental disorders other than major depressive disorder will be excluded. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Hong Kong | Department of Psychology | Hong Kong |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Chinese University of Hong Kong |
Hong Kong,
Andersson G, Titov N, Dear BF, Rozental A, Carlbring P. Internet-delivered psychological treatments: from innovation to implementation. World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):20-28. doi: 10.1002/wps.20610. — View Citation
Andrade LH, Alonso J, Mneimneh Z, Wells JE, Al-Hamzawi A, Borges G, Bromet E, Bruffaerts R, de Girolamo G, de Graaf R, Florescu S, Gureje O, Hinkov HR, Hu C, Huang Y, Hwang I, Jin R, Karam EG, Kovess-Masfety V, Levinson D, Matschinger H, O'Neill S, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Sampson NA, Sasu C, Stein DJ, Takeshima T, Viana MC, Xavier M, Kessler RC. Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys. Psychol Med. 2014 Apr;44(6):1303-17. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713001943. Epub 2013 Aug 9. — View Citation
Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H, Riedel-Heller SG. Whom to ask for help in case of a mental disorder? Preferences of the lay public. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;34(4):202-10. doi: 10.1007/s001270050134. — View Citation
Axelsson E, Andersson E, Ljotsson B, Hedman-Lagerlof E. Cost-effectiveness and long-term follow-up of three forms of minimal-contact cognitive behaviour therapy for severe health anxiety: Results from a randomised controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2018 Aug;107:95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 15. — View Citation
Baumeister H, Nowoczin L, Lin J, Seifferth H, Seufert J, Laubner K, Ebert DD. Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on diabetes patients' acceptance of Internet-based interventions for depression: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Jul;105(1):30-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.04.031. Epub 2014 May 10. — View Citation
Berry LL, Beckham D, Dettman A, Mead R. Toward a strategy of patient-centered access to primary care. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Oct;89(10):1406-15. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Sep 4. — View Citation
Carlbring P, Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Hedman-Lagerlof E. Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2018 Jan;47(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115. Epub 2017 Dec 7. — View Citation
Cavanagh K, Shapiro DA, Van Den Berg S, Swain S, Barkham M, Proudfoot J. The acceptability of computer-aided cognitive behavioural therapy: a pragmatic study. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(4):235-46. doi: 10.1080/16506070802561256. — View Citation
Chien I, Enrique A, Palacios J, Regan T, Keegan D, Carter D, Tschiatschek S, Nori A, Thieme A, Richards D, Doherty G, Belgrave D. A Machine Learning Approach to Understanding Patterns of Engagement With Internet-Delivered Mental Health Interventions. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010791. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10791. — View Citation
Clement S, Brohan E, Jeffery D, Henderson C, Hatch SL, Thornicroft G. Development and psychometric properties the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation scale (BACE) related to people with mental ill health. BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Jun 20;12:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-36. — View Citation
Clement S, Schauman O, Graham T, Maggioni F, Evans-Lacko S, Bezborodovs N, Morgan C, Rusch N, Brown JS, Thornicroft G. What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Psychol Med. 2015 Jan;45(1):11-27. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714000129. Epub 2014 Feb 26. — View Citation
Coulter A, Stilwell D, Kryworuchko J, Mullen PD, Ng CJ, van der Weijden T. A systematic development process for patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S2. Epub 2013 Nov 29. — View Citation
Cuijpers P, Clignet F, van Meijel B, van Straten A, Li J, Andersson G. Psychological treatment of depression in inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Apr;31(3):353-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 16. — View Citation
De las Cuevas C, Penate W, de Rivera L. Psychiatric patients' preferences and experiences in clinical decision-making: examining concordance and correlates of patients' preferences. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Aug;96(2):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 May 22. — View Citation
Dorow M, Lobner M, Pabst A, Stein J, Riedel-Heller SG. Preferences for Depression Treatment Including Internet-Based Interventions: Results From a Large Sample of Primary Care Patients. Front Psychiatry. 2018 May 17;9:181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00181. eCollection 2018. — View Citation
Gelhorn HL, Sexton CC, Classi PM. Patient preferences for treatment of major depressive disorder and the impact on health outcomes: a systematic review. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2011;13(5):PCC.11r01161. doi: 10.4088/PCC.11r01161. — View Citation
Givens JL, Houston TK, Van Voorhees BW, Ford DE, Cooper LA. Ethnicity and preferences for depression treatment. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 May-Jun;29(3):182-91. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.11.002. — View Citation
Gultzow T, Smit ES, Hudales R, Dirksen CD, Hoving C. Smoker profiles and their influence on smokers' intention to use a digital decision aid aimed at the uptake of evidence-based smoking cessation tools: An explorative study. Digit Health. 2020 Dec 29;6:2055207620980241. doi: 10.1177/2055207620980241. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. — View Citation
Hanson K, Webb TL, Sheeran P, Turpin G. Attitudes and Preferences towards Self-help Treatments for Depression in Comparison to Psychotherapy and Antidepressant Medication. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2016 Mar;44(2):129-39. doi: 10.1017/S1352465815000041. Epub 2015 Feb 20. — View Citation
Harter M, Klesse C, Bermejo I, Bschor T, Gensichen J, Harfst T, Hautzinger M, Kolada C, Kopp I, Kuhner C, Lelgemann M, Matzat J, Meyerrose B, Mundt C, Niebling W, Ollenschlager G, Richter R, Schauenburg H, Schulz H, Weinbrenner S, Schneider F, Berger M. [Evidence-based therapy of depression: S3 guidelines on unipolar depression]. Nervenarzt. 2010 Sep;81(9):1049-68. doi: 10.1007/s00115-010-3084-7. German. — View Citation
Hockenberry JM, Joski P, Yarbrough C, Druss BG. Trends in Treatment and Spending for Patients Receiving Outpatient Treatment of Depression in the United States, 1998-2015. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 1;76(8):810-817. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0633. Erratum In: JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 May 29;: — View Citation
Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Mar;94(3):291-309. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031. Epub 2013 Nov 9. — View Citation
Josephine K, Josefine L, Philipp D, David E, Harald B. Internet- and mobile-based depression interventions for people with diagnosed depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2017 Dec 1;223:28-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Jul 10. — View Citation
Kaltenthaler E, Sutcliffe P, Parry G, Beverley C, Rees A, Ferriter M. The acceptability to patients of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: a systematic review. Psychol Med. 2008 Nov;38(11):1521-30. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707002607. Epub 2008 Jan 21. — View Citation
Kenwright M, Marks I, Gega L, Mataix-Cols D. Computer-aided self-help for phobia/panic via internet at home: a pilot study. Br J Psychiatry. 2004 May;184:448-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.184.5.448. Erratum In: Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;185(2):178. Marks, Isaac M [corrected to Marks, Isaac]. — View Citation
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. — View Citation
Loh A, Kremer N, Giersdorf N, Jahn H, Hanselmann S, Bermejo I, Harter M. [Information and participation interests of patients with depression in clinical decision making in primary care]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2004 Mar;98(2):101-7. German. — View Citation
Mahoney A, Li I, Haskelberg H, Millard M, Newby JM. The uptake and effectiveness of online cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of anxiety and depression during COVID-19. J Affect Disord. 2021 Sep 1;292:197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.116. Epub 2021 Jun 4. — View Citation
March S, Day J, Ritchie G, Rowe A, Gough J, Hall T, Yuen CYJ, Donovan CL, Ireland M. Attitudes Toward e-Mental Health Services in a Community Sample of Adults: Online Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 19;20(2):e59. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9109. — View Citation
McCall HC, Sison AP, Burnett JL, Beahm JD, Hadjistavropoulos HD. Exploring Perceptions of Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behaviour Therapy among Public Safety Personnel: Informing Dissemination Efforts. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 19;17(17):6026. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176026. — View Citation
Miller DP Jr, Spangler JG, Case LD, Goff DC Jr, Singh S, Pignone MP. Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid: a randomized controlled trial in a mixed-literacy population. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jun;40(6):608-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.019. — View Citation
Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Measuring the global burden of disease. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 1;369(5):448-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1201534. No abstract available. — View Citation
Musiat P, Goldstone P, Tarrier N. Understanding the acceptability of e-mental health--attitudes and expectations towards computerised self-help treatments for mental health problems. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Apr 11;14:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-109. — View Citation
Musiat P, Tarrier N. Collateral outcomes in e-mental health: a systematic review of the evidence for added benefits of computerized cognitive behavior therapy interventions for mental health. Psychol Med. 2014 Nov;44(15):3137-50. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714000245. Epub 2014 Feb 19. — View Citation
National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (UK). Depression: The Treatment and Management of Depression in Adults (Updated Edition). Leicester (UK): British Psychological Society; 2010. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK63748/ — View Citation
O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500105. — View Citation
Patel SR, Bakken S. Preferences for participation in decision making among ethnically diverse patients with anxiety and depression. Community Ment Health J. 2010 Oct;46(5):466-73. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9323-3. Epub 2010 Jun 17. — View Citation
Perestelo-Perez L, Rivero-Santana A, Sanchez-Afonso JA, Perez-Ramos J, Castellano-Fuentes CL, Sepucha K, Serrano-Aguilar P. Effectiveness of a decision aid for patients with depression: A randomized controlled trial. Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):1096-1105. doi: 10.1111/hex.12553. Epub 2017 Mar 10. — View Citation
Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder (revision). American Psychiatric Association. Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;157(4 Suppl):1-45. No abstract available. — View Citation
Rahimi AR, Spertus JA, Reid KJ, Bernheim SM, Krumholz HM. Financial barriers to health care and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2007 Mar 14;297(10):1063-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.10.1063. — View Citation
Raue PJ, Schulberg HC, Heo M, Klimstra S, Bruce ML. Patients' depression treatment preferences and initiation, adherence, and outcome: a randomized primary care study. Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Mar;60(3):337-43. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.3.337. — View Citation
Renn BN, Hoeft TJ, Lee HS, Bauer AM, Arean PA. Preference for in-person psychotherapy versus digital psychotherapy options for depression: survey of adults in the U.S. NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Feb 11;2:6. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0077-1. eCollection 2019. — View Citation
Santucci LC, McHugh RK, Barlow DH. Direct-to-consumer marketing of evidence-based psychological interventions: introduction. Behav Ther. 2012 Jun;43(2):231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Jul 28. — View Citation
Savelberg W, van der Weijden T, Boersma L, Smidt M, Willekens C, Moser A. Developing a patient decision aid for the treatment of women with early stage breast cancer: the struggle between simplicity and complexity. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0505-6. — View Citation
Seidler ZE, Dawes AJ, Rice SM, Oliffe JL, Dhillon HM. The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Nov;49:106-118. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 10. — View Citation
Sewell WC, Solleveld P, Seidman D, Dehlendorf C, Marcus JL, Krakower DS. Patient-Led Decision-Making for HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2021 Feb;18(1):48-56. doi: 10.1007/s11904-020-00535-w. Epub 2021 Jan 8. — View Citation
Spurgeon JA, Wright JH. Computer-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010 Dec;12(6):547-52. doi: 10.1007/s11920-010-0152-4. — View Citation
Stacey D, Legare F, Boland L, Lewis KB, Loiselle MC, Hoefel L, Garvelink M, O'Connor A. 20th Anniversary Ottawa Decision Support Framework: Part 3 Overview of Systematic Reviews and Updated Framework. Med Decis Making. 2020 Apr;40(3):379-398. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20911870. — View Citation
Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5. — View Citation
Steidtmann D, Manber R, Arnow BA, Klein DN, Markowitz JC, Rothbaum BO, Thase ME, Kocsis JH. Patient treatment preference as a predictor of response and attrition in treatment for chronic depression. Depress Anxiety. 2012 Oct;29(10):896-905. doi: 10.1002/da.21977. Epub 2012 Jul 5. — View Citation
Swift JK, Callahan JL. The impact of client treatment preferences on outcome: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol. 2009 Apr;65(4):368-81. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20553. — View Citation
Taylor S, Landry CA, Paluszek MM, Fergus TA, McKay D, Asmundson GJG. Development and initial validation of the COVID Stress Scales. J Anxiety Disord. 2020 May;72:102232. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102232. Epub 2020 May 4. — View Citation
Wallin EE, Mattsson S, Olsson EM. The Preference for Internet-Based Psychological Interventions by Individuals Without Past or Current Use of Mental Health Treatment Delivered Online: A Survey Study With Mixed-Methods Analysis. JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Jun 14;3(2):e25. doi: 10.2196/mental.5324. — View Citation
Wills CE, Holmes-Rovner M. Preliminary validation of the Satisfaction With Decision scale with depressed primary care patients. Health Expect. 2003 Jun;6(2):149-59. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00220.x. — View Citation
Witteman HO, Ndjaboue R, Vaisson G, Dansokho SC, Arnold B, Bridges JFP, Comeau S, Fagerlin A, Gavaruzzi T, Marcoux M, Pieterse A, Pignone M, Provencher T, Racine C, Regier D, Rochefort-Brihay C, Thokala P, Weernink M, White DB, Wills CE, Jansen J. Clarifying Values: An Updated and Expanded Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):801-820. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211037946. — View Citation
* Note: There are 55 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Depression | The PHQ-9 provides a brief 9-item measure of current depression symptoms using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Participants will be asked to rate their past week depression symptoms. | at baseline | |
Primary | Depression | The PHQ-9 provides a brief 9-item measure of current depression symptoms using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Participants will be asked to rate their past week depression symptoms. | Upon completion of intervention, around half an hour later from baseline | |
Secondary | COVID Stress | To measure the distress associated with COVID-19, subscales of the COVID Stress Scales will be used. Instructions for the fear-related items were as follows: "The following questions ask about various kinds of worries that you might have experienced over the past seven days… about the virus." Items will be rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). We used the term "worries" to assess feared (anticipated) outcomes. The traumatic stress items will be rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). The higher the score, the higher the COVID stress. | at baseline and upon completion of intervention, around half an hour later from baseline | |
Secondary | Electronic mental health Service Awareness | Electronic health readiness will be measured by the 7-item eHealth readiness scale. Items will adopt a 6-point Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree and 6 = strongly agree). Scores could range between 7 and 42. Sample items include "I enjoy the challenge of figuring out the different functions of websites and web applications" and "I would be comfortable using an internet-connected device several times a week to participate in a lifestyle intervention online" | at baseline and upon completion of intervention, around half an hour later from baseline | |
Secondary | Barriers to access to care | Barriers related to stigma and discrimination and other non-stigma related barriers were assessed using the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale. The BACE is a 30-item self-report instrument where respondents are asked whether each of the items has ever stopped, delayed, or discouraged them for receiving or continuing care for their mental health problems. It has a four-point response scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (a lot). The higher the score, the stronger the barrier. | at baseline and upon completion of intervention, around half an hour later from baseline | |
Secondary | Financial Barriers | To define financial barriers to health care, the following questions will be asked(Rahimi, Spertus, Reid, Bernheim, &Krumholz, 2007): "In the past year, have you avoided obtaining (1) health care services/ (2) doctor's subscribed medication because of cost?" Avoidance of health care services due to cost will be answered on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "never" to "always." | at baseline and upon completion of intervention, around half an hour later from baseline | |
Secondary | Perceived Financial Well-being | Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being Scale. The CFPB Financial Well-Being Scale is a 5-item self-report instrument which reflecst a respondent's subjective sense of their financial situation. It has a five-point response scale ranging from 0 (Does not describe me at all) to 4 (Describes me completely). The lower the score, the better the perceived subjective well-being. | at baseline and upon completion of intervention, around half an hour later from baseline | |
Secondary | Conformity to masculine norm | Masculine norm will be measured by the short form of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory (CMNI-30)- emotional control (3 items) and self-reliance (3 items) subscales. Items will be rated on a six-point Likert scale ranged from 0 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Sample items include "I tend to share my feelings" and "It bothers me when I have to ask for help". The higher the score, the higher the conformity. | at baseline at baseline and upon completion of intervention, around half an hour later from baseline | |
Secondary | Disclosure | The Disclosure Expectations Scale. DES is an 8-item measure of one's expected consequences of disclosing distressing information to therapists (e.g., "If you were dealing with an emotional problem, how beneficial for yourself would it be to self-disclose personal information about the problem to a therapist?"). Items will be rated on a five-point Likert scale ranged from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (very). | at baseline and upon completion of intervention, around half an hour later from baseline | |
Secondary | Depression Stigma | Stigma towards depression will be measured using the Depression Stigma Scale (DSS). DSS consists of 18 items with a measure of the respondent's personal attitudes towards depression and a measure of the respondent's beliefs about the stigmatizing attitudes of others. Each subscale includes nine items using a 5-point Likert scale, which ranges from 4 points (strongly agree) to 0 points (strongly disagree). The choice of "strongly agree" or "agree" for each item indicates the presence of personal or perceived stigma. The higher the score, the higher the depression stigma. | at baseline and upon completion of intervention, around half an hour later from baseline | |
Secondary | E-mental health Service Awareness | Participants would be asked questions on whether they have heard about; have they previously tried; and are they currently using e-mental health services. Items would be in binary responses with 0 = "never heard/ tried/using" and 1 = "have heard/ tried/ currently using". | at baseline and upon completion of intervention, around half an hour later from baseline | |
Secondary | Evaluation of importance of mental health treatment attributes (Rank) | Participants will be asked to think of mental health treatments in general and rank what they would consider important if they were to seek help right now, from 1 "Most important" to 6 "The least important". The attributes are as follow: (1) Could effectively help with my mental health issuel; (2) Credible; (3) Appealing; (4) Low/No Cost; (5) Could protect my right of privacy and personal information; (6) Is accessible without/with short waiting time; (7) Could motivate me to finish the treatment; (8) Can be accessed at a convenient time; (9) No/low transportation cost; (10) Personalization with reference to my need; (11) Provides feedback; (12) Without side-effect; (13) Could provide real-time support when I am in need; (14) To help me keep track of my mental health status; (15) Can be accessed anonymously | at baseline and upon completion of intervention, around half an hour later from baseline | |
Secondary | Evaluation of importance of mental health treatment attributes (Rate) | Participants will be asked to think of mental health treatments in general and rate what they would consider important if they were to seek help right now. . Items will be rated on a seven-point Likert scale ranged from 0 not at all important) to 5 (very important). The attributes are as follow: (1) Could effectively help with my mental health issuel; (2) Credible; (3) Appealing; (4) Low/No Cost; (5) Could protect my right of privacy and personal information; (6) Is accessible without/with short waiting time; (7) Could motivate me to finish the treatment; (8) Can be accessed at a convenient time; (9) No/low transportation cost; (10) Personalization with reference to my need; (11) Provides feedback; (12) Without side-effect; (13) Could provide real-time support when I am in need; (14) To help me keep track of my mental health status; (15) Can be accessed anonymously | at baseline and upon completion of intervention, around half an hour later from baseline | |
Secondary | Likelihood of use of service | Participants would be asked the following question, "To what extent would you consider the following management options for symptoms of depression such as having depressed mood and loss of interest during past 2 weeks?". Scale ranging from 1 ("very unlikely") to 5 ("very likely"). | at baseline and upon completion of intervention, around half an hour later from baseline |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05777044 -
The Effect of Hatha Yoga on Mental Health
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04680611 -
Severe Asthma, MepolizumaB and Affect: SAMBA Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04977232 -
Adjunctive Game Intervention for Anhedonia in MDD Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04043052 -
Mobile Technologies and Post-stroke Depression
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04512768 -
Treating Comorbid Insomnia in Transdiagnostic Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03207828 -
Testing Interventions for Patients With Fibromyalgia and Depression
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04617015 -
Defining and Treating Depression-related Asthma
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06011681 -
The Rapid Diagnosis of MCI and Depression in Patients Ages 60 and Over
|
||
Completed |
NCT04476446 -
An Expanded Access Protocol for Esketamine Treatment in Participants With Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) Who do Not Have Other Treatment Alternatives
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02783430 -
Evaluation of the Initial Prescription of Ketamine and Milnacipran in Depression in Patients With a Progressive Disease
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05563805 -
Exploring Virtual Reality Adventure Training Exergaming
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04598165 -
Mobile WACh NEO: Mobile Solutions for Neonatal Health and Maternal Support
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03457714 -
Guided Internet Delivered Cognitive-Behaviour Therapy for Persons With Spinal Cord Injury: A Feasibility Trial
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05956912 -
Implementing Group Metacognitive Therapy in Cardiac Rehabilitation Services (PATHWAY-Beacons)
|
||
Completed |
NCT05588622 -
Meru Health Program for Cancer Patients With Depression and Anxiety
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05234476 -
Behavioral Activation Plus Savoring for University Students
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05006976 -
A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03276585 -
Night in Japan Home Sleep Monitoring Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT03167372 -
Pilot Comparison of N-of-1 Trials of Light Therapy
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03275571 -
HIV, Computerized Depression Therapy & Cognition
|
N/A |