The Antidepressive Effect of rTMS as add-on to ECT

Depression Clinical Trial

— TMS  

Official title:

The Antidepressant Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ( rTMS) as add-on to Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT). A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02123485
• Other study ID #: 1-10-72-509-12
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: April 1, 2015
• Est. completion date: July 1, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: February 2021
• Source: University of Aarhus
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of the present study is to investigate in which degree low frequency right prefrontal rTMS used ad add-on may potentiate the antidepressant effect of unilateral ECT and accelerate remission .

To investigate the correlation between blood concentration of specific inflammation makers and change in depressive symptoms during treatment

Description:

ECT is a well-established and effective method for the treatment of severe depression. During the last decades, rTMS has appeared as a potential new non-invasive antidepressant method, which may be a potential alternative to ECT due to fewer side effects.

Both methods expose the brain to an electric current. But while ECT is associated with global cerebral stimulation elicited by an epileptic seizure, rTMS implies non-convulsive focal stimulation through a time varying magnetic field. Thus, the antidepressant effect of rTMS does not depend on seizure activity and consequently requires no anesthesia. In addition, rTMS seems not to be associated with cognitive disturbances.

Previous research indicates that the antidepressant effect of rTMS is associated with specific stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The majority of clinically controlled studies have used high frequency stimulation of the left frontal cortex (1-4). Few have used right prefrontal low frequency rTMS, which has less side effects, such as local discomfort and a lower risk of releasing epileptic seizures, than high frequency stimulation (5-10). Both models have been used with varying results. Meta-analysis of the antidepressant effect of rTMS (11,x) have found a modest, statistically significant antidepressant effect but generally definite conclusions on the antidepressant effect of rTMS has been difficult to draw, probably because of small and selected study populations, varying ways of stimulation and other confounding factors in the clinical setting.

The important clinical question of whether rTMS may substitute ECT in the treatment of depression has almost exclusively been elucidated in studies using high frequency stimulation of the left frontal cortex. Some of these suggest that the effectiveness of rTMS is equal to that of ECT in non-delusional patients (12-19). However, a recent investigation has compared the antidepressant efficacy and side effects of right prefrontal low frequency rTMS with ECT. In this study the mean Hamilton total 17-item (HAM-D score) scores were reduced significantly over time in both groups (ECT: p<0.001, rTMS: p<0.001); but ECT was more effective than rTMS on a short term after 3 weeks of treatment. The outcome did not point to right frontal low frequency rTMS as a first line substitute for ECT, but it might have place in the treatment of depression as add on to other types of treatment.

ECT is normally administered 3 times a week for 3-4 weeks. Daily treatment sessions might accelerate remission, but is impossible because of cognitive side effects. However, rTMS seems not to be associated with reduction in cognitive performance and might potentiate the antidepressant efficacy of ECT. Therefore the investigators have found it clinical interesting to investigate in which degree low frequency right prefrontal rTMS used ad add-on may potentiate the antidepressant effect of unilateral ECT and accelerate remission .

In addition we want to investigate te correlation between change in depressive symptoms and

-blood concentration of specific inflammation CNS- makers

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 35
• Est. completion date: July 1, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: July 1, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients admitted to the Psychiatric Hospital of Aarhus

• Patients referred for ECT

• Age 18-80 years

• Moderate or severely depressed patients (ICD-10(DSM-IV)

• HAM-D score (17-item) =20 and/or Ham-D subscale =10.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Organic brain disease

• Epilepsy or disposition to epilepsy

• Metallic objects in chest or brain

• Cardiac pacemaker

• Somatic diseases associated with brain dysfunction

• Pregnancy

• Severe agitation or delirium

• Alcohol or drug dependence (ICD-10)

• Use of coercive measures

• The patient does not wish to participate

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Depression

Intervention

Device:
• Low frequency (1 hz) rTMS, as add-on to ECT
Right prefrontal Low frequency (1 hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as add-on to ECT.
• Sham-rTMS
Right prefrontal Low frequency (1 hz) sham-stimulation using af double blind placebo coil as add-on to ECT.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Denmark	Aarhus University Hospital, Risskov	Aarhus	Risskov

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Aarhus

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Denmark, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Remission	The Hamilton (17 -item) Rating Scale for Depression is a clinician-administered assessement scale, that contains 17 items pertaining to symptoms of depression experienced over the past week. The total range is 0-52.Higher scores mean a worse outcomeRemission is defined by a Hamilton 17-item total score < 8.	7 weeks
Secondary	Response	The Hamilton (17 -item) Rating Scale for Depression is a clinician-administered assessement scale, that contains 17 items pertaining to symptoms of depression experienced over the past week. The total range is 0-52.Higher scores mean a worse outcome. Response is defined by a reduction in the Hamilton 17 item score of >= 50%	7 weeks