View clinical trials related to Dentin Sensitivity.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to evaluate the Desensitizing efficacy of polymeric nano calcium fluoride containing varnish and its implementation into clinical practice.
Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) can be defined as acute, short-duration pain from open dentin tubules in exposed dentin. The symptom of DH is subjective and varies from patient to patient and may present as mild discomfort or as a high-intensity pain, which can affect the individual's quality of life, interfering with their eating and hygiene habits. One approach to treatment would be the use of agents that chemically desensitize sensory nerves, blocking the transmission of nerve stimuli to the central nervous system. The effectiveness of desensitizing treatments is influenced by several factors present in the oral cavity, which can contribute to a greater effect of these agents but can also be responsible for removing them from the dental surface. To date, studies have been carried out in the short term, not exceeding an average period of 12 weeks, so there is no consensus on the technique or agent that will guarantee the most effective and lasting effect against DH, not even the ideal period for reapplication. Thus, more studies are needed to assess the clinical behavior of desensitizing products on the market, especially the most recent releases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clinically compare the effectiveness of different office treatments for DH, being ClinproTM White Varnish, ClinproTM XT Varnish, and a control group (placebo) through pain assessment with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), after stimulation with air from the triple syringe.
Subjects will be enrolled into 3 balanced groups each using a different strength toothpaste. Dental hypersensitivity (DHS) will be assessed at study start, midway and study end.
Will the use of Bio-smart Light Cured Protective Shield with bioactive S-PRG filler or the use of Sodium Fluoride with Xylitol-coated Calcium and Phosphate (CXP™) Varnish be able to reduce the teeth hypersensitivity similar to Sodium Fluoride Varnish?
To compare the efficacy of two commercially available in-office desensitizing agents (Fluoraphat Pro and VivaSens®), in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity.
The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three kinds of commercially available desensitizing agents: Gluma, Sheildforce plus, and Telio CS desensitizers in reducing the pre- and post-cementation sensitivity for full coverage restorations.
Aim of the study will be conducted to compare the efficacy of bifluoride (NaF and CaF) versus conventional fluoride varnish (Sodium Flouride) in the management of hypersensitivity of exposed cervical area in adult patients over 2 month
The aim of the study to compare the clinical effectiveness of Shield Force Plus (SFP) versus sodium fluoride varnish in the management of hypersensitivity of cervical dentin in adult patients for 8weeks.
The present project will compare the effect of DH reduction using three different dentifrices (Sensodyne Repair and Protect - NOVAMIN technology; Dentalclean Daily Regenerator - REFIX technology; Dentalclean Daily Regenerator - REFIX technology + potassium citrate) in periodontal patients. The evaluation will be in 6 moments: T1 and T2- immediately before and after scaling and root planing (SRP) procedures; T3-after polishing sensitive areas with rubbers cups and the dentifrice determined for each group of patients and T4, 5, 6- After 2, 4 and 8 weeks of SRP. Profissional assessments and patient perception data will be performed.
Background: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is defined as high sensitivity of the vital dentin when exposed to thermal, chemical or tactile stimuli. Two mechanisms are required for the occurrence of DH: 1) the dentin must be exposed and 2) the dentinal tubules must be open and connected to the pulp. Molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH) is a qualitative abnormality of a genetic origin that affects tooth enamel and, in most cases, is accompanied by DH. The control of tooth sensitivity is fundamental to the successful treatment of MIH. Objective: The aim of the proposed randomized, controlled, clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of different protocols for the control of DH in patients with teeth affected by MIH. Methods: One hundred forty patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be allocated to four groups. Group 1 will be the control group (placebo). In Group 2, sensitive teeth will be sealed with Permaseal (Ultradent). In Group 3, sensitive teeth will receive low-level laser (LLL) (AsGaAl) at a wavelength of 780 nm (Laser XT Therapy, DMC, São Carlos, SP, Brazil). In Group 4, sensitive teeth will be treated with both LLL and Permaseal (Ultradent). DH will be evaluated 15 min after the application of the treatments and the patients will be reevaluated one week, one month, three months and six months after the treatments. Discussion: This study will enable the determination of differences in the effectiveness of the proposed treatments as well as differences among the evaluation times for each proposed treatment.