View clinical trials related to Dentin Sensitivity.
Filter by:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a self etch adhesive resin and two desensitizing agents(Calcium phosphate, 5% glutaraldehyde) in treatment of dentin hypersensitivity on the quality of life of individuals.
The aim of this in vivo study is to evaluate the post-bleaching enamel hypersensitivity and the possible color changes following the application of arginine and nano-hydroxyapatite remineralizing solutions after enamel bleaching using an in-office chemical bleaching agent. A commercial Fluoride remineralizing and desensitizing agent will be used as the control group. Following bleaching of the anterior teeth and then the application of the different tested remineralizing agents; the patients will be assessed for post-bleaching hypersensitivity using the visual analogue scale (VAS) to describe the severity of the hypersensitivity from mild to moderate to severe. On the other hand, the baseline shade and post-bleaching color changes will be evaluated using a shade guide. The data will be collected and tabulated then the statistical analysis will be performed. The null hypothesis is that the different tested remineralizing agents will have a similar effect on the post-bleaching teeth hypersensitivity & the color changes of the bleached teeth.
This study aims to evaluate the use of different desensitizing agents before in-office bleaching. A total of 64 volunteers were randomly divided into four groups. Before undergoing in-office bleaching with 38% hydrogen peroxide gel (three applications of 15 minutes each, one session), clinicians applied a placebo gel (control group), casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), neutral sodium fluoride gel (NSF), or nano-hydroxyapatite solution (n-HAP) on all buccal surfaces of teeth. The gel was left undisturbed for 4 minutes. Patients recorded their tooth sensitivities on the VAS scale. Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare changes in tooth color and intensity of tooth sensitivity between groups.
Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of Propolis and Gluma desensitizer on the management of Dentin Hypersensitivity Methods Patients with dentin hypersensitivity exhibiting pain scores of at least '2' on the visual analog scale (VAS) were included in the study. Patient's response to an air blast stimulus was noted on Visual Analogue Scale and Schiff's scale in order to record the degree of hypersensitivity of teeth. There were 80 teeth, 40 in each group. The baseline scores were obtained. Propolis and Gluma desensitizer were randomly applied to each hypersensitive tooth. VAS scores and Schiff's sensitivity score for air blast stimulus were then noted at baseline, immediate, after 1 week and then after 1 month of application.
Objectives: The aim of this in vivo randomized clinical trial with split-mouth design was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of one in-office application of a fluoride containing varnish and in office application of a bonding resin in adult patients presenting with dentin hypersensitivity. Materials and Methods: The study cohort consisted of 38 Caucasian outpatients, giving a total of 180 teeth were treated by fluoride varnish (FV) and 160 - by bonding agent (BA). Baseline pain in FV group was slightly higher on both scales (SCHIFF and VAS). Outcome measurements were assessed one or two weeks before product application (enrollment), at baseline at the application days (end of the run-in period: T0a, T0b, T0c), and at 1 week and at 1-2-6 months after first treatment.
This is a phase 1/2a study in dentin hypersensitivity patients to assess the safety, tolerability, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of KH001.
This observational cohort study aims to evaluate the short-term (3 months) efficacy of the standard fluoride therapy in the German National Health System for managing hypersensitive carious lesions in primary teeth (fluoride varnish application), and further compare it to a different fluoride therapy utilizing a silver-containing fluoride agent combined with potassium iodide solution.
Background: Dentine hypersensitivity (DH) causes considerable pain and discomfort to an individual due to number of stimuli on exposed dentine. Different kinds of treatment strategies are used in the resolution of dentine hypersensitivity including the use of propolis and dentine bonding agent. No study had compared the efficacy of propolis and dentine bonding agent. Objective: The objective of the study was to find out whether there is a difference in the efficacy of Propolis and seventh generation dentine bonding agent in reducing the dentine hypersensitivity. Comparison within the groups and pairwise comparisons were also recorded in reducing dentine hypersensitivity. Methods: In this six month In- Vivo single blinded randomized clinical study, a total number of 52 patients with complain of dentine hypersensitivity were selected in two groups after taking informed consent. Group A and B received 30% ethanolic extract of propolis and dentine bonding agents respectively by a trained operator. Recordings of dentine hypersensitivity were obtained at Day 0, before and after the application of experimental agents, and also on Day 7, 15 and 30 by the principal investigator. Response was measured by Visual Analog Scale and Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 was used to analyze the data with level of significance set at p < 0.05. Friedman test was applied to see the comparison within groups and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used for Pairwise comparison. Mann Whitney U-Test was applied for comparison between groups.
Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) can be defined as acute, short-duration pain from open dentin tubules in exposed dentin. The symptom of DH is subjective and varies from patient to patient and may present as mild discomfort or as a high-intensity pain, which can affect the individual's quality of life, interfering with their eating and hygiene habits. One approach to treatment would be the use of agents that chemically desensitize sensory nerves, blocking the transmission of nerve stimuli to the central nervous system. The effectiveness of desensitizing treatments is influenced by several factors present in the oral cavity, which can contribute to a greater effect of these agents but can also be responsible for removing them from the dental surface. To date, studies have been carried out in the short term, not exceeding an average period of 12 weeks, so there is no consensus on the technique or agent that will guarantee the most effective and lasting effect against DH, not even the ideal period for reapplication. Thus, more studies are needed to assess the clinical behavior of desensitizing products on the market, especially the most recent releases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clinically compare the effectiveness of different office treatments for DH, being ClinproTM White Varnish, ClinproTM XT Varnish, and a control group (placebo) through pain assessment with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), after stimulation with air from the triple syringe.
Subjects will be enrolled into 3 balanced groups each using a different strength toothpaste. Dental hypersensitivity (DHS) will be assessed at study start, midway and study end.