View clinical trials related to Deep Vein Thrombosis.
Filter by:While blood clots after major cancer surgery are common and harmful to patients, the medications to decrease blood clot risk are seldom used after patients leave the hospital despite the recommendation of multiple professional medical societies. The reason why these medications are seldom prescribed is not well understood. The main questions this study aims to answer are: - Does surgeon education paired with an electronic medical record based decision support tool improve the guideline concordant prescription of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism after abdominopelvic cancer surgery? - Does dedicated patient education regarding blood clots at the time of hospital discharge after abdominopelvic cancer surgery improve understanding of the risk of venous thromboembolism and adherence to pharmacologic prophylaxis? The investigators will study these questions using a stepped-wedge randomized trial where groups of surgeons will use a tool integrated to the electronic medical record to educate them on the individualized patient risks of blood clots after major cancer surgery and inform them regarding guidelines for preventative medicines. Utilization of the medications before and after using the tool will be compared. Patients will be administered a questionnaire assessing their awareness of blood clots as a risk after cancer surgery. For those prescribed medications to reduce blood clot risk after leaving the hospital, the questionnaire will evaluate whether they took the medications as prescribed. Survey results will be evaluated before and after implementation of education on blood clot risk at the time of hospital discharge.
A new algorithm derived from only patient age and components of the complete blood count and basic metabolic panel can identify patients discharged from the hospital who may benefit from a blood thinner (called rivaroxaban) to decrease their risk of blood clots, and for whom the risk of bleeding is minimal. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a pop-up alert, which will be seen by clinicians when a discharging patient has been identified as being someone for whom the risk of blood clots is high, but for whom bleeding risk is estimated to be low. The pop-up alert will be enabled in a sequential fashion for each group of hospitals in 1 month blocks. We will look to see if the pop-up alert changes the number of patients who receive rivaroxaban. We will also measure the outcomes of blood clots and bleeding among all discharging patients.
Lower limb trauma requiring immobilization is a very frequent condition that is associated with an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). The TRiP(cast) score has been developed to provide individual VTE risk stratification and help in thromboprophylactic anticoagulation decision. The recent CASTING study had confirmed that patients with a TRiP(cast) score <7 have a very low risk of VTE and could be safely manage without prophylactic treatment. Conversely, patients with a score ≥ 7 have a high-risk of VTE and require a prophylactic anticoagulant treatment. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have been shown to be effective in this indication. However, in the CASTING study, the 3-month symptomatic VTE rate was 2.6% in this subgroup despite LMWH prophylactic treatment. This result suggests that LMWH are not sufficiently effective in this particular subgroup of high-risk patients. Direct oral anticoagulants, and in particular rivaroxaban, may be an effective and safe alternative to LMWH. In the PRONOMOS study, comparing LMWH with rivaroxaban in patients who had undergone non-major lower limb surgery, the relative risk of symptomatic VTE was 0.25 (95% CI = 0.09 - 0.75) in favor of rivaroxaban 10mg. No significant increase in bleeding was found. In addition, as LMWH treatment requires subcutaneous daily injections, the use of rivaroxaban may positively impact patients' quality of life as well as being effective in medico-economic terms. The aims of this study are to demonstrate that rivaroxaban is at least as effective, easier to use and more efficient than LMWH in patients with trauma to the lower limb requiring immobilisation and deemed to be at risk of venous thromboembolism (TRiP(cast) score ≥ 7). High-risk patients are randomized to receive either rivaroxaban or LMWH. They are followed up at 45 days and 90 days to assess the occurrence of thrombotic events or bleeding, as well as their satisfaction with the treatment received.
Compression ultrasonography (CUS), which is the gold-standard for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, cannot provide adequate information on the timing of the onset of thrombosis. Shear-Wave elastography, a technique used to assess tissue elasticity and widely used in hepatology, could play a crucial role in distinguishing between acute and chronic deep vein thrombosis. This study aims at evaluating the efficacy and diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of Shear-Wave elastography in distinguishing between acute and chronic deep vein thrombosis.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in describe participant population health conditions. The main questions it aims to answer are: - To obtain the limb movement and bed mobility limits after femoral venipuncture, in order to provide a basis and support for clinical reduction of postoperative braking time and alleviation of postoperative patient subjective discomfort - To analyze the effect of perioperative factors such as anticoagulation and sheath size on the complication rate, so as to develop a detailed and systematic strategy to stop bleeding after femoral venipuncture - The advantages and necessity of reducing the postoperative braking time in bed were demonstrated by objective evaluation of patients' postoperative subjective feelings and mental status. In this prospective study, 150 patients who underwent femoral vein puncture intervention were selected by inclusion and exclusion criteria, and were randomly divided into control group, trial A group and trial B group by SPSS software, with 50 cases each. In the control group, the lower limb of the punctured side was braked for 4 hours + 8 hours after routine postoperative activities; in the trial A group, the lower limb of the punctured side was braked for 2 hours + 4 hours after postoperative activities; in the trial B group, the lower limb of the punctured side was braked for no postoperative activities + 2 hours after postoperative activities, and the corresponding evaluation indexes and questionnaires were used to record the hemostasis at the puncture site, whether complications occurred and the subjective feelings of patients in each group after completing the corresponding strategies. The data were also recorded along with the general information of the patients and the factors that may cause bleeding in the perioperative period. Statistical analysis was used to classify, summarize and draw conclusions about the data obtained, analyze the limit of braking bed time, and formulate scientific hemostatic strategies.
This prospective, observational, post-market study will be performed to collect patient-level data on the Celect Platinum Vena Cava Filter Sets and the Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Set to confirm continued safety and performance of the devices throughout their expected lifetime and continued acceptability of the benefit:risk ratio. Additionally, the study intends to evaluate longer-term (i.e., up to 5 years) outcome data while the filter is indwelling.
There is no randomized controlled trial examining surveillance ultrasonography for lower limb DVT in high-risk medical-surgical ICU patients compared to a clinician-directed approach. The DETECT randomized controlled trial addresses the question of whether surveillance ultrasound in critically ill patients by facilitating DVT detection reduces the incidence of PE and lowers all cause 90-day mortality. The primary outcome is 90-day all-cause mortality.
Isolated distal DVT (iDDVT) is the most frequent clinical presentation of VTE and is associated with a significant morbidity and risks of long-term complications. Data from clinical trials highlighted that patients with iDDVT might require some level of AC treatment. However, the optimal anticoagulant intensity is uncertain, and it is plausible that the best benefit/risk ratio for AC might be achieved with lower intensity doses rather than therapeutic doses. The principal research question of the Apixaban to treat calf vein thrombosis (API-CALF) study is to determine whether, after a conventional course of 7 days of Apixaban 10mg BID, Apixaban 2.5mg BID (experimental arm) is non inferior to Apixaban 5 mg BID (standard arm) in preventing VTE recurrence and bleeding in patients with iDDVT. Patients will be treated with Apixaban for a total of 3 months. In that perspective we will conduct an international multicentre open-label assessor-blinded study
This study investigates electrical acupoint stimulation (EAS) administered in peri-operation for improving postoperative recovery in elder patients, who accept knee arthroplasty. the surgery cause to change of stress response, which might be associated with postoperative recovery of patient Totally, three groups are created, 1/3 participants receive transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation, 1/3 participants receive electroacupuncture, the rest 1/3 will use sham transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation.
Introduction Undiagnosed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) can lead to significant morbidity and mortality, including death from DVT-associated massive pulmonary embolism (PE). While several validated clinical prediction rules, blood test and imaging modalities exist to investigate a potential DVT, there is currently a lack of rapid, accessible and reliable methods to exclude the possibility of DVT without resorting to formal venous duplex scanning. Currently, the use in the ED of a validated clinical prediction rule combined with high-sensitivity D-dimer test has a poor predictive value, as 75-90% of patients suspected of DVT have a negative formal venous duplex scan. Compression bedside ultrasound has however recently been shown to be a safe, rapid and accurate method for the diagnosis of proximal DVT in the emergency department with a high sensitivity and specificity (combined sensitivity and specificity of 96.1% and 96.8%, respectively1). Research Question In the present study, the investigators will primarily assess whether two-site compression POCUS combined with a negative age-adjusted D-dimer test can accurately rule out DVT in ED patients regardless of the Wells criteria. Methods This is a single-center, prospective, observational study carried out over one year in the Emergency Department of the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal, Quebec. The investigators aim to enroll a convenience sample of 475 patients aged 18 years and older presenting to the ED with symptoms suggestive of a DVT. All enrolled patients will receive the standard of care required for a lower leg DVT presentation. After calculating Patients DVT risk using modified wells criteria, all patients will undergo POCUS for DVT followed by a D-dimer test. Based on their results, patients will either undergo formal duplex scanning, or will be discharged without further testing and receive a three-month phone follow-up. A true negative lower leg DVT will be defined as follows: 1. Negative follow-up phone questionnaire for patients who were sent home with no formal duplex venous scanning. 2. Negative formal duplex venous scanning for patients who were deemed likely to have lower leg DVT using the Wells score, with a negative D-dimer and POCUS Age-adjusted DVT was added to account for below knee DVT and avoid the need for patients to return for fellow up duplex study in 1 week. To estimate our technique's sensitivity with a 4% margin of error with 95% confidence intervals, 92 confirmed DVT patients are needed. The investigators expect to recruit a total 475 patients within one-year period at the JGH (95 DVT-positive patients and 380 DVT-negative patients). Impact The use of compression bedside ultrasound with a negative age-adjusted D-dimer test to rule out DVT in the ED may accelerate the decision regarding patient disposition and significantly decrease the length of patient stay in the ED. In addition, it may help avoid unnecessary medical interventions and diagnostic tests, thus representing potential quality of care and cost-saving improvements as well.