View clinical trials related to Deep Brain Stimulation.
Filter by:The goal of this project is to evaluate the safety and preliminary effectiveness of utilizing a digital therapeutic, Dual-task Augmented Reality Treatment (DART) protocol, for the treatment of postural instability and gait dysfunction (PIGD) in individuals with PD with a previously implanted deep brain stimulator (DBS).
Op-TICS is a clinical investigation of the use of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), with a CE marked implantable device, to reduce severe motor and vocal tics in patients who suffer from Tourette Syndrome (TS). It is a randomised, double-blind, crossover clinical investigation for 20 patients. Op-TICS will be performed at the National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery. Following DBS surgery, participants will first enter an open adjustment phase, of 6 months, where the electrical stimulation settings of the device are optimised. Participants will then enter the double-blind phase that will include successively up to 2 weeks with stimulation on and up to 2 weeks with the stimulation off in a randomised order. The primary outcome measure is the tic severity score measured by the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale -Total Tic Score after two weeks OFF-stimulation versus two weeks ON-stimulation in the double-blind randomised crossover phase
The goal of this single-center prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of imaging-based DBS programming with threshold assessment-based DBS programming in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor response fluctuations. The main question the study aims to answer is: Is the improvement of motor symptoms in the OFF-drug phase following STN DBS for Parkinson's disease, using imaging-based DBS programming only, non-inferior to the improvement of motor symptoms following DBS programming with threshold assessment at six months follow-up? Participants will be randomized to imaging-based programming or to threshold assessment-based programming. The main clinical outcome is motor symptoms; secondary outcomes are level of physical disability and quality of life, among others.
The objective of this project is to evaluate next generation visualization tools and surgical targeting models for clinical deep brain stimulation (DBS). This study will evaluate the performance of HoloDBS software in comparison to the current standard (SOC) clinical planning tools to prepare for DBS surgery. The investigators hypothesize that HoloDBS will provide more detailed and anatomically useful information to the neurosurgeon and neurologist than the current clinical standard. The study team reviews electronic medical records (EMR) from patients who are undergoing DBS surgery. There are no study visits involved in this study as only data from standard clinical care will be used. All study activities are executed by the study team and there are no interventions.
Background: Hemiplegia is a common complication after a stroke. Studies have shown that traditional medical and rehabilitation treatments are not good for improving patients' motor function, deep brain stimulation (DBS) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) can improve the motor function of patients, but there is no comparative study between them. Objectives: This study compares the efficacy and safety of DBS and VNS in the recovery of motor function in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia, determining the best treatment for patients with post-stroke hemiplegia, and providing high-level clinical evidence for patients and clinicians to choose from. Methods/Design: This is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, cross-controlled pilot study. A total of 98 patients with post-stroke hemiplegia are assigned to receive DBS or VNS. After 3 and 6 months of follow-up, all the devices are turned off. After a 2-week washout, the control group is turned on, but the stimulation group is given sham stimulation. After 9 and 12 months of follow-up, all the devices are turned on. Then, at postoperative 15 and 18 months, postoperative neuroimaging and various post-stroke motor-related scores were performed for data collection and analysis. Discussion: We propose a study design and rationale to compare the efficacy and safety of DBS and VNS in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia to provide evidence and reference for implantable neuromodulation in the treatment of post-stroke dysfunction, and to compare the therapeutic effects of DBS and VNS to provide evidence for patient and clinical diagnosis and treatment choices. Study limitations are related to the small sample size and short study period.
This is a multi-center, single arm, prospective, open-label, extendable study for the efficacy and safety of combo-stim deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory mental disorders (obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar with depression, anorexia nervosa, gambling disorder and adult autism).
This study aims to conduct a randomized controlled study to compare the efficacy of remote programming (RP) on the improvement of motor function after DBS surgery in PD patients with standard programming (SP).
Rationale: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus is an effective surgical treatment for patients with disabling essential tremor, despite optimal pharmacological treatment. To date, the standard DBS procedure is performed under local anesthesia which is very burdensome for patients. It is now possible to directly visualize the target (motor) area in the thalamus due to advances in modern imaging techniques. DBS surgery could be performed under general anesthesia (asleep). Objective: The primary objective of the study is to determine whether asleep thalamic DBS surgery provides an equal tremor reduction compared to awake thalamic DBS surgery, measured by the clinically validated Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale after six months of DBS. Secondary outcomes are: disease related daily functioning, adverse effects, operation time, quality of life, patient satisfaction with treatment outcome and patient evaluation of treatment burden. Study design: The study will be a multicentre prospective randomized open label blinded (PROBE) endpoint trial comparing thalamic DBS under general versus local anesthesia. Study population: A total of 110 patients with disabling essential tremor despite optimal pharmacological treatment will be randomized. Intervention (if applicable): Patients will be randomized for asleep DBS or awake DBS. According to the standard DBS procedure, two brain-electrodes are connected to an implanted neurostimulator, which is placed subcutaneously in the subclavicular area Main study parameter/endpoints: The primary outcome measure is the change in tremor score on the Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale after 6 months of thalamic DBS. The secondary outcome measures are the Amsterdam Linear Disability Score for functional health status, Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire, patient satisfaction with the treatment, patient evaluation of treatment burden, operating time, hospitalization time, change of tremor medication, side effects and complications. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Awake DBS at present is very burdensome and by many patients and health care providers considered to be an overly invasive treatment for essential tremor. Through this trial, we aim to investigate whether asleep DBS in essential tremor can become the new treatment standard. This is expected to increase the accessibility for DBS and subsequently would allow more people with essential tremor to be helped, as well as in an earlier stage of their disease than currently; more patients will benefit for a longer time period from DBS. Asleep DBS will have a shorter procedure length. The proposed research project involves treatment options that are standard care in daily practice. The therapies will not be combined with other research products. Both treatments have a low risk of serious complications and a higher risk of minor side effects. Regular follow up will be used. Participation in this study constitutes moderate risk according to NFU criteria for human research.
Sleep-wake disturbances are a major factor associated with reduced quality of life of individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD), a progressive neurological disorder affecting millions of people in the U.S and worldwide. The brain mechanisms underlying these sleep disorders, and the effects of therapeutic interventions such as deep brain stimulation on sleep-related neuronal activity and sleep behavior, are not well understood. Results from this study will provide a better understanding of the brain circuitry involved in disordered sleep in PD and inform the development of targeted therapeutic interventions to treat sleep disorders in people with neurodegenerative disease.
As a surgical intervention, DBS can effectively relieve PD tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia and other symptoms. How to better screen patients suitable for DBS treatment and conduct reasonable preoperative and postoperative evaluation is crucial to judge the treatment effect and prognosis. The clinical symptom evaluation of PD patients can be divided into motor symptom evaluation and non-motor symptom evaluation. The motor symptoms of PD patients were evaluated by UPDRS III. The evaluation of non-motor symptoms in PD patients was mainly divided into three aspects: cognitive status, emotional status, and sleep status. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were used to assess the cognitive status of PD patients. The Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) was used to assess the patients' depression status. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) was used to assess the patients' anxiety status. The PD Sleep Scale 2nd version, The PD Sleep Scale 2nd version, PDSS - 2), and rem Sleep Behavior Disorder Questionnaire (sweet HK) (Rapid Eye Movement Sleep behaviors Disorder Questionnaire - Hong Kong, RBDQ - HK) to assess Sleep conditions.