There are about 10560 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Taiwan. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This multicenter, randomized, adaptive Phase II/III study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) compared to standard taxane (docetaxel or paclitaxel) treatment in participants with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced gastric cancer. At the start of the trial (stage 1), participants will be randomized with a ratio 2:2:1 to one of three treatment arms: Arm A: trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) per intravenous injection (IV) every 3 weeks; Arm B: trastuzumab emtansine 2.4 mg/kg IV every week; Arm C: standard taxane therapy (docetaxel 75 milligram per meter square [mg/m^2] IV every 3 weeks or paclitaxel 80 mg/m^2 kg IV every week per investigator choice). At the end of the first stage of the study, the dose and schedule of trastuzumab emtansine that will be used in the second stage of the study will be selected by an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC). The regimen selection analysis will be made after approximately 100 participants across all three study arms have been treated for at least 12 weeks. Once a trastuzumab emtansine regimen has been selected, Stage I participants who were assigned to the treatment arm which was selected for Stage II of the study and participants who were in the standard taxane group will continue to receive their assigned treatment regimen. Stage I participants who were assigned to the regimen that was not selected for further evaluation will continue to receive their assigned regimen and will continue to be followed for efficacy and safety. In Stage II of the study, additional participants will be recruited and randomized with a ratio 2:1 to either the selected regimen of trastuzumab emtansine or to the standard taxane therapy. Participants will receive study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, initiation of another cancer therapy or withdrawal.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term safety and tolerability of fostamatinib in patients in Asia with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of PEGASYS® (peginterferon alfa-2a 40KD) plus Robatrol® (ribavirin) combination therapy given for 36 weeks versus 48 weeks on the clearance of HCV viremia 24 weeks after treatment end
This is a prospective, observational, open-label, 2-arm, parallel, multi-center study. Patients with HBV-associated severe acute exacerbation for whom the treatment with NRTI (such as lamivudine and entecavir) is medically recommended will be screened for eligibility. To target 74 evaluable subjects, approximately 82 patients should be recruited into this trial. After enrollment, all eligible subjects will be randomly assigned to one of the antiviral treatments below. - Cohort 1: Lamivudine 100 mg p.o. q.d. - Cohort 2: Entecavir 0.5 mg p.o. q.d. This process will be stratified by prolonged PT, < 4 sec / 4-6 sec / > 6 sec. Both lamivudine and entecavir will be taken once daily and the first dose of observational drug should be administered on Day 1. The observational period of individual subject will be 12 weeks; however, both treatments could be continued after the end of study based on physician's clinical judgment. The efficacy and safety data will be collected at baseline, 3, 5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 85, and 180 days after initiation of antiviral treatment. All assessments should be conducted based on routine practice of each hospital. Only the analysis of HBV DNA and anti-HDV will be performed in the central lab. For patients who are willing to provide the residual samples of HBV DNA assessment, the blood samples will be preserved appropriately. All AE(s) and SAE will be followed until resolution or the event is considered stable.
Background: Surveys have shown that antipsychotic drug combinations are frequently prescribed. Amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic agent, has low incidence of extrapyramidal symptom (EPS) but with high cost compared to sulpiride. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the 800-mg/d amisulpride and 400-mg/d amisulpride plus 800-mg sulpiride in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia. Method: In this 6-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study, patients with schizophrenia are randomly assigned to amisulpride (800 mg/d) or amisulpride (400 mg/d) plus sulpiride (800 mg/d).The hypothesis is that the two treatment groups have the similar efficacy and safety, but different cost.
Orthostatic hypotension is a major complication of hemodialysis and interferes with everyday activities in hemodialysis patients. Since information regarding the use of droxidopa in clinical trials relating to orthostatic hypotension of chronic hemodialysis patients is limited in Taiwan, this study is designed for evaluation the efficacy and safety profile of droxidopa on orthostatic hypotension treatment / prevention in hemodialysis patients.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate no excess risk of cardiovascular (CV) composite events exists following long term treatment with TAK-875 compared with placebo.
Study objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate through clinical criteria the clinical efficacy and safety of BCT Silver Bandage role in obstetrical and gynecological wound healing is as effective and safe as Aquacel® Ag. Dressing. Study devices: - Study device: BCT Silver Bandage - Comparator device:"ConvaTec"Aquacel® Ag Hydrofiber Dressing Study design: - Randomized, Open-label, interventional, comparative, preventive study with Blinded evaluator. - All subjects must meet all the inclusion & exclusion criteria to enter this study in pre-operative phase. - Eligible subjects will be enrolled after a scheduled operative procedure. - There is SEVEN visits in this study (one screening eligibility phase up to 7 days before OP day, and four post-op treatment scheduled visits consisting on 1st , 3rd day, 5th day, 12th day and two follow up visit on the 28th and the 42nd post-operative day. - During each scheduled visit, each subject will have colored picture of his wound after dressing been removed, and on visit V6 for wound evaluation by blinded PI. Number of subjects: It is expected to recruit ≧150 eligible subjects. Study Duration: About eighteen month.
This was a multi-center, open-label, Phase Ib dose escalation /Phase II study in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM HNSCC) patients considered to be resistant, ineligible or intolerant to platinum-based chemotherapy. The Phase Ib included three arms. Three different methods of administration and two different BYL719 formulations were studied to determine the MTD and/or RP2D of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab: Arm A - film-coated whole tablets were orally administered to patients who were able to swallow the tablets; Arm B - a drinkable suspension prepared from crushed film-coated tablets was administered orally to patients with swallowing dysfunction Arm C - a suspension from a dispersible tablet administered via G-tube, in patients with swallowing dysfunction. Arm C was used to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), compared to Arm A (film coated tablet), and safety of the dispersible tablet of the dispersible tablet formulation of BYL719. The Phase II investigated the clinical efficacy of BYL719 and consisted of an open label, randomized Phase II part investigating BYL719 in combination with cetuximab compared to cetuximab alone in patients resistant or intolerant to platinum and naïve to cetuximab (Scheme 1: Arm 1 and Arm 2), and a non-randomized Phase II part Scheme 2: Arm 3. In addition, patients who experienced disease progression in Arm 2 (cetuximab) were allowed to switch to the combination regimen (cross-over, Arm 2B). The safety of the BYL719 in combination with cetuximab was also further characterized in Arms 1, 2B and 3. Patients were treated until progression of disease), unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever occurred first (except for phase II Arm 2 had the opportunity to crossover to the combination treatment (Arm 2B). In the follow-up period all patients had to complete the safety follow-up assessments within 30 days after the last dose of the study treatment. Patients who did not have disease progression at the time of discontinuation of study treatment were radiologically followed for disease status until disease progression, initiation of subsequent anticancer therapies, or death, whichever occurred first. In addition, all patients enrolled in Phase II were followed for survival.
Vorinostat is a potent and well tolerated HDAC inhibitor. It has been reported to enhance radiosensitivity of cancer cells. We hypothesize that the addition of vorinostat to WBRT may increase therapeutic efficacy for patients with brain metastases.