There are about 6461 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Russian Federation. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
A case-control study to identify microbiome and genetic differences between healthy subjects and patients with incident Parkinson's disease.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of filgotinib compared to placebo as assessed by the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response in participants with active psoriatic arthritis who are naive to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. The study consists of two parts, the Main Study and the Long Term Extension (LTE).
This is a clinical trial to determine the long-term safety and tolerability of an investigational drug in people with schizophrenia. Participants in the study will receive the drug being studied. This study is accepting male and female participants between 13 and 65 years old who have been diagnosed with schizophrenia and have completed Study SEP361-301 or SEP361-302. This study will be conducted in approximately 80 study centers worldwide. The treatment duration for this study is one (1) year.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of JNJ-active as measured by the change in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score and Simplified Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) from baseline at Week 12.
A Phase 3, multi-center, open-label study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ampreloxetine in subjects with primary autonomic failures (MSA, PD, and PAF) and symptomatic nOH over 182 weeks.
The purpose of the study was to assess preliminary efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LYS006 in adult patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis and to determine if LYS006 has an adequate clinical profile for further development in this indication.
The primary goal of the study was to evaluate the parameters of efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of a single dose of RPH-104 in adult patients with acute gout attack.
This study compares haplo-identical family donor stem cell transplantation (haplo SCT) to matched unrelated donor transplantation (URD SCT) in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with the hypothesis that haplo SCT is as good as URD SCT. Background: A haplo-identical family donor is a relative sharing 50% of the human leukocyte antigens (HLA) of the patient. SCT with this type of donor is increasing, and a number of retrospective studies have demonstrated its feasibility, but prospective randomized studies are still lacking. Such studies are necessary to establish the benefits of haplo SCT. For the ≈70% of the patients that lack the 1st choice donor, an HLA-matched sibling, the 2nd choice is an URD at most centers. However, if haplo-identical donors are as good as URDs, this could change. Haplo-identical donors have several advantages. Almost all patients have at least one available haplo-identical donor, while URDs can be difficult to find. It also eliminates the need for time-consuming donor searches, and is considerably less costly. The Study: Patients can be included in the study if they have AML and require SCT, ≥18 years, DO NOT have an HLA-matched sibling donor, and DO have potential haplo-identical family donors AND URDs. After enrollment in the study, the patients are assigned randomly to either haplo SCT or URD SCT. The treatment surrounding the transplantation differs according to the donor type. Patients receiving haplo-identical transplantation are treated with a specified chemotherapy protocol before transplantation and a chemotherapy combined with immunosuppressive drugs after the transplantation to prevent graft-vs. host disease (GVHD). The patients receiving URD SCT will be treated according to the standard protocol at their center. Thus, haplo SCT will be compared to what is currently used in patients without an HLA-identical sibling today. The primary endpoint of this study is graft-vs.-host disease- and relapse free survival two years after study inclusion. This measurement takes into account the side effect that causes the most long-term suffering, graft-vs-host disease, as well as leukemia relapse and thus indicates to what extent the treated patients remain relapse-free and without significant side effects. Secondary end points include relapse-free survival, frequencies of graft-versus-host disease and of infections, and the patients will be followed in the study for five years.
Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oral tropifexor & licogliflozin combination therapy and each monotherapy, compared with placebo for treatment of adult patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and liver fibrosis.
To assess the safety and tolerability of long-term pimavanserin treatment in subjects with major depressive disorder and inadequate response to antidepressant treatment.