There are about 6461 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Russian Federation. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of daratumumab when combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) to that of lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd), in terms of progression-free survival in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
This randomized, active controlled, multicenter phase III open-label study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alectinib compared with crizotinib treatment in participants with treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK-positive) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either alectinib, 600 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily (BID), or crizotinib, 250 mg orally BID. Participants will receive treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. The study is expected to last approximately 144 months.
The purpose of this study is to generate detailed insight into which therapies of giant intracranial aneurysms are being conducted, to document the natural history and the outcome of treatment over 5 years after inclusion into the Registry and to follow imaging data of giant aneurysms over years after diagnosis.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of enzalutamide in patients with non metastatic prostate cancer.
This open label, randomised, controlled, multi-centre phase III study will assess the efficacy and safety of single agent olaparib vs standard of care based on physician's choice of capecitabine, vinorelbine or eribulin in metastatic breast cancer patients with gBRCA 1/2 mutations.
The proposed protocol will involve the replacement of the trachea using a synthetic bioengineered scaffold seeded with autologous mononuclear cells as an intraoperative solution for patients with with benign and malignant laryngo-tracheal diseases or other terminal conditions of the trachea. Tracheal transplant is indicated as the only therapeutic alternative in cases where instrumental, endoscopic and other evaluations show that the length of residual healthy airways (about 6 cm or longer than 50% of the airway length) and the localization and extension of the obstruction make it impossible to perform a surgical resection of the pathological segment. In addition to tracheal surgical transplant techniques, this protocol requires knowledge and experience with autologous cell preparation as well as scaffold seeding procedures.
This is a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of two separate dose regimens of Alpha-1 MP versus placebo for 156 weeks (i.e., 3 years) using computed tomography (CT) of the lungs as the main measure of efficacy. The two Alpha-1 MP doses to be tested are 60 mg/kg and 120 mg/kg administered weekly by IV infusion for 156 weeks. The study consists of an optional pre-screening phase, Screening Phase, a 156-week Treatment Phase, and an End of Study Visit at Week 160.
The purpose of the Reveal LINQ Usability Study is to assess the functionality of the Reveal LINQ insertable cardiac monitor and accompanying system in patients indicated for an insertable cardiac monitor
QUESTIONS AND OBJECTIVES OF ALL-MB-2008 STUDY 1. Whether the early PEG-asparaginase in induction will lead to the earlier achievement of remission, improvement of days 8 and 15 responses leading to an earlier reconstitution of bone marrow and immunocompetence, decrease of severe infections and early mortality rate? 2. Whether the use of PEG-asparaginase in induction will allow to avoid the anthracyclines in standard risk group patients and to reduce treatment myelotoxicity? 3. Whether the administration of 9 doses of PEG-asparaginase 1,000 U/m2 instead of 18 doses of E.coli L-asparaginase 5,000 U/m2 in standard risk patients will improve treatment outcome? 4. Whether the administrations of high dose methotrexate (2 g/m2 in 24 hours) during 1-st consolidation in intermediate risk patients will result in decrease of central nervous system relapse incidence and improvement of event-free and overall survival? Whether the increase of 6-mercaptopurine starting dose up to 50 mg/m2 in 1-st consolidation phase (instead of 25 mg/m2) will decrease in relapse risk, but would not be accompanied with enhanced toxicity? 5. Is it possible to completely avoid the cranial irradiation in intermediate risk patients? In some subgroup of intermediate risk patients? Is it enough to control neuroleukemia in these patients to introduce additional TIT in the consolidation phase of treatment? How will change the possible late effects in these patients according to the third arm of randomization? 6. Will the new risk group stratification to improve overall and event-free survival?
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apalutamide in adult men with high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.