There are about 6461 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Russian Federation. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Background: Thoracoscopic ablation is an effective treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation. Nowadays, 2 types of ablative devices are available in clinical practice allowing one to perform the thoracoscopic procedure - Medtronic and AtriCure. However, the contemporary clinical literature does not have enough data that would compare these two approaches. Aims: to perform a comparative analysis of the short-term results of two minimally invasive strategies in thoracoscopic ablation for atrial fibrillation. Methods: The retrospective study was performed in which included 232 patients underwent thoracoscopic ablation for atrial fibrillation in two clinical centers for the period from 2016 to August 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups. The first group was represented by those patients to whom a Medtronic device was applied (n=140), the second group was treated with an AtriCure device (n=92). The patients were comparable in their age, gender, initial severity of the condition. The follow-up consisted of laboratory tests, chest Х-ray, electrocardiography, 24-hour Holter monitor, echocardiography. The structure and prevalence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, specifics of the postoperative period were compared between the two groups.
This is a prospective randomized trial to improve the results of treatment of patients with colorectal neoplasms.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RPH-104 for long-term use in a population of patients with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis who completed the main study CL04018068. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety of RPH-104 80 mg once every 2 weeks in patients with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis who completed the main study.
This is an open-label, Phase 2, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profiles of botensilimab as monotherapy and in combination with balstilimab or standard-of-care treatments in participants with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
GVHD prevention using a combination of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in combination with abatacept, vedolizumab and calcineurin inhibitor in children and young adults with hematoloblastosis after myeloablative conditioning regimen with treosulfan/TBI, cyclophosphamide/etoposide, fludarabine after HSCT from matched unrelated and haploidentical donors
Introduction Despite significant progresses in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and the development of reperfusion treatment methods, heart failure still often complicates its course. There are three types of postinfarction heart failure: occurring in the acute period, during hospital treatment and after discharge. Factors contributing to heart failure during hospitalization for MI and after discharge include comorbidity of the patient, worsening of pre-existing CHF and comorbidities. In the last decades we can observe higher level of myocardial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), improvement of pre-hospital care, which decreased mortality and HF; however, the proportion of HF patients with preserved ejection fraction increased. All these factors determine the urgency of the studied problem. Purpose of the study To identify the most significant factors contributing to the development of acute and subacute heart failure after myocardial infarction Materials and methods Retrospective and prospective non-randomized parallel-group analysis of 186 suffered MI (mean age 63.5 y) during one year was performed in this work, and in the main group of patients (86 patients) at 30 days after MI, chronic heart failure over 2F by NYHA was confirmed, and in comparison group (100 patients) CHF was either absent or did not exceed 2F by NYHA. The diagnosis of MI and CHF was made according to national and European guidelines. Both groups received standard therapy for CHF: ACE inhibitors/angiotensin 2/angiotensin receptor antagonists and neprolysin inhibitor (ARNI), β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (AMCR), SGLT2-receptor inhibitors; anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, statins, diuretics if necessary were also used. One year after discharge, clinical outcomes were assessed: cardiovascular mortality, repeated hospitalizations due to decompensation of CHF, death from other causes, stroke, repeated myocardial infarction, unscheduled coronary revascularization; telephone contacts were made every month, repeat visits to the clinic - one year later. The results were based on the information collected in the course of telephone contacts and via e-mail; hospitalizations were also monitored by querying the databases of medical institutions.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two doses of study drug (BCD-180) in comparison with placebo in patients with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The study will include HLA-B27+ patients with radiographic axSpA who had no response to prior therapy with Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), have not received biologic therapy or targeted Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).
A little attention is paid to the AHT efficacy escaping problem, which can be explained by the AHT correction simplicity and rapid achievement of the target BP level. Nevertheless, modern statistic data on the effective AH treatment described above let us assume that AHT correction is either totally absent or is untimely in case of the "escape" phenomenon development. This could be one of the main reasons for the high prevalence of ineffective AH treatment. The aim of this study is to determine AHT efficacy "escape" phenomenon timeline and its predictors in hypertensive patients.
This is a prospective randomized controlled study, designed to assess the influence of posterior colporrhaphy and perineoplasty performed simultaneously with mesh-augmented sacrospinal fixation (apical sling) in advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair.
This is a prospective randomized controlled study, designed to compare efficacy and safety of two methods of apical fixation in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) - sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSHP) with synthetic mesh and laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSHP), and the impact of the surgery on quality of life.