There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
In the current study the effectiveness of the Dutch diversion measure Halt is investigated using a randomized controlled trial. Because of the thorough scientific substantiation of the intervention theory, it is hypothesized that receiving the Halt-intervention will lead to less recidivism in comparison to receiving no intervention.
The aim of this pilot project is to investigate a treatment program for children with social anxiety, in which children and their parents, parallel to each other, follow separate evidence-based interventions. The added value of this pilot project is that the investigators are examining how both programs interact when offered simultaneously.
Prehospital treatment of acute traumatic pain is common in military practice. Analgesics are usually administered intravenously (IV). Research from the civil prehospital environment shows that obtaining IV access can be difficult and time consuming, delaying onset of treatment. The challenges for obtaining IV access in the military prehospital setting are even bigger, for example in combat environments. However, this has not been assessed. Current guidelines also offer alternative routes of administration for analgesics, for example intranasal (IN) administration. IN administration is a fast, easy and effective route of administration. This study determines whether IN administration of analgesia is faster and leads to increased healthcare provider satisfaction compared to IV administration in patients with acute traumatic pain in a simulated military prehospital environment.
The aim of this mixed-methods study is to describe both the implementation process and outcomes of the online module Advance Care Plan for (hemato-)oncology patients within the oncology-network CONCORD. The main question is: How is implementation and assurance of the advance care plan in daily care for (hemato-)oncological patients within CONCORD achieved, so that early integration of advance care planning in oncological care takes place and patient preferences are discussed? Healthcare providers and patients are asked to use the module and share their experiences with it.
The goal of this multiple baseline case series study is to test the effect of imagery rescripting (ImRs) in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) and Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD). Primary objective :The course of schema or core beliefs and change in OCD and BDD. To investigate the effectiveness of imagery rescripting on factors presumed to underlie the disorder, according to schema theory, and on OCD and BDD symptoms. Secondary objective: The change in OCD and BDD symptoms (full questionnaire), schemata and modes, core emotions, mood, affect and obtrusiveness of intrusion. Other objectives are research into the working mechanisms of imagery rescripting by collecting qualitative data from patients and their practitioner in a qualitative interview. For this study, a multiple-baseline single-case experimental design (SCED) is used testing different outcome variables in 18 OCD patients and 18 BDD patients. After a variable baseline period of 3-8 weeks participants will start twice weekly with imagery rescripting for 12 sessions, followed by a 6 week follow up. Participants will rate schema- or core beliefs and OCD or BDD severity on a visual analogue scale. In addition participants will rate core emotions, affect and obtrusiveness of the intrusion. Secondary we will asses four times questionnaires about OCD of BDD symptoms, depression and schemas en modes. After treatment participants will be interviewed about their experiences.
This study will compare postoperative pain, health related quality of life (HRQoL), function, rehabilitation, urinary incontinence, muscle atrophy and component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the posterolateral approach (PLA) or the direct superior approach (DSA). In addition, the CT images will be used to validate a new metal artefact reduction technique.
This is a single center, non-blinded, multi-cohort, non-comparative phase II trial to study the safety and efficacy of tiragolumab with atezolizumab and/or ipilimumab in advanced triple-negative breast cancer.
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to assess the effectiveness of ACE inhibitors versus standard care) in reversing asymptomatic heart failure (HF stage-B) and/or diastolic dysfunction during a two-year open-label treatment period for formerly preeclamptic women on: 1. Reversibility of structural and functional myocardial impairment in asymptomatic HF towards healthy values; 2. The progression from asymptomatic to symptomatic HF (symptoms scored based on the NYHA criteria); 3. Cardiovascular performance (volume- and pressure load), cardio metabolic risk factors (glucose metabolism, lipid status, kidney function) and quality of life (questionnaires); 4. Novel biomarkers and relevant microRNA's indicative for hypertrophy, fibrosis inflammation and ischemia. Eligible subjects will be counselled and upon informed consent randomized for either medication group (n=65) or care as usual group (n=65). After a complete cardiovascular assessment, medication will be initiated open-labeled (Perindopril 2 mg or no medication). Thereafter, standard medical check-ups (blood pressure, ECG, kidney function, transthoracic cardiac ultrasound, endothelial function, quality of life questionnaires, medical history taking, blood and urine banking) will be performed every six months for two years. Researchers will compare ACE inhibitor (Perindopril 2 mg) and care as usual (i.e. no medication) to investigate whether ACE inhibitor allows timely recovery after subclinical heart failure.
Rationale: Approximately 13% (range 10-28%) of all colorectal cancer patients (CRC) present with an acute obstruction. Postoperative mortality after an emergency resection is known for its high risk of morbidity and mortality. Different options can be considered in the management of obstructing right sided CRC: 1) primary resection, simultaneous treatment of obstruction and tumour resection, or 2) staged treatment of the obstruction with secondary resection of the tumour. Currently, in the Netherlands, an emergency resection has been judged to be inferior to postponing surgery. Patients who present with right sided obstructive colon cancer at one of the participating hospitals are subjected to a bridge to surgery (BTS) protocol. Objective: The primary objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of BTS protocols in right sided obstructive colon cancer and reduce mortality- and morbidity (stoma rates, major- and minor complications) rates in potentially curable patients presenting with acute obstructing colon cancer. Study design: This is a multicentre, prospective registration study Study population: All patients presenting with high clinical suspicion or histologically proven right sided colon cancer and signs of obstruction of the large bowel. Intervention: Prospective registration of the implementation of bridge to surgery protocols in patients with (acute) malignant right sided obstruction of the colon, without suspicion of perforation (tumour perforation or blow out) in order to optimize patients preoperatively. The BTS approach encompasses the utilization of either ileostomy creation, stent placement or nasogastric tube for decompression, which is subsequently followed by definitive surgical treatment at a later stage. BTS also involves pre-optimization, prior to the surgical procedure, with the following approach: optimizing the nutritional health status improving the physical health status of the patient. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is complication-free survival (CFS) at 90 days after hospitalization. Complication is defined here as mortality and/or development of a major complication (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥3). With a total follow up of three years. Secondary endpoints: overall mortality, morbidity (stoma rates, minor complications), in hospital stay, oncologic quality of resection and other occurring adverse events.
Insomnia is a common sleep problem that impacts both physical and mental health. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Insomnia (ACT-I) is proposed as a promising new treatment for insomnia. However, its effectiveness without overlapping behavioral components of the current standard treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy, remains largely unknown. The main goal of this clinical trial is to test the efficacy of stand-alone ACT-I in adults with insomnia, compared to a waitlist control group. The second goal is to explore the potential working mechanisms of ACT-I, using network intervention analysis. Adults with insomnia will be randomized to an ACT-I or waitlist group. Both the ACT-I treatment and waiting period span 7 weeks. Assessments take place at baseline (pre), after 4 weeks (mid), and after 8 weeks (post), followed by a 3- and 6-month follow-up for the ACT-I group. The main questions this RCT aims to answer are: - Is ACT-I superior to a waitlist control group in improving insomnia severity (primary outcome) in addition to sleep diary measures, anxiety, depression, general mental health, and sleep-related quality of life (secondary outcomes)? - How do networks of insomnia symptoms or potential treatment processes (i.e., psychological (in)flexibility, sleep-related arousal, dysfunctional cognitions, and sleep-related safety behaviors) develop during and following ACT-I?