There are about 1295 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Lithuania. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The primary objective of the study is to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of REGN2810 (cemiplimab) plus ipilimumab combination therapy (hereinafter referred to as REGN2810/ipi) and REGN2810 plus 2 cycles only of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy plus ipilimumab combination therapy (hereinafter referred to as "REGN2810/chemo/ipi") with standard-of-care pembrolizumab monotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous or non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors express programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in ≥50% of tumor cells. The key secondary objectives of the study are to compare the overall survival (OS) of REGN2810/ipi and REGN2810/chemo/ipi with pembrolizumab monotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous or non-squamous NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 in ≥50% of tumor cells and to compare the overall response rate (ORR) of REGN2810/ipi and REGN2810/chemo/ipi with pembrolizumab monotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous or non-squamous NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 in ≥50% of tumor cells.
Primary Objective: To demonstrate that efpeglenatide 4 and 6 mg was noninferior to placebo on 3-point major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) participants at high cardiovascular (CV) risk. Secondary Objectives: To demonstrate that efpeglenatide 4 and 6 mg was superior to placebo in T2DM participants with high CV risk on the following parameters: - 3-point MACE. - Expanded CV outcome. - Composite outcome of new or worsening nephropathy. To assess the safety and tolerability of efpeglenatide 4 and 6 mg, both added to standard of care in T2DM participants at high CV risk.
In the BN40031 OLE study, a dose of crenezumab of 60 mg/kg intravenous (IV) every 4 weeks (Q4W) will be offered to all participants who complete Study BN29552 or BN29553 and who meet eligibility criteria in order to evaluate safety in participants on long-term crenezumab treatment and to investigate the effect of crenezumab on the underlying disease process and disease course as an exploratory efficacy objective.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of gantenerumab versus placebo in participants with early (prodromal to mild) AD. All participants must show evidence of beta-amyloid pathology. Eligible participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either subcutaneous (SC) injection of gantenerumab or placebo. The primary efficacy assessment will be performed at the end of the double blind period at week 116. Participants will then be offered to enter into an open-label extension (OLE). Participants not willing to go to the OLE will participate in a long term follow-up period for up to 50 weeks after the last gantenerumab dose.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and virologic benefit of pimodivir in combination with Standard-of-Care (SOC) treatment compared to placebo in combination with SOC treatment.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and virologic benefit of pimodivir in combination with Standard-of-Care (SOC) treatment compared to placebo in combination with SOC treatment.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of Padsevonil administered at individualized doses as adjunctive treatment for subjects with drug-resistant epilepsy.
The primary objective of the study was to compare the effect of sotagliflozin to placebo on total occurrences of cardiovascular (CV) death, hospitalization for heart failure [HHF], and urgent visit for heart failure [HF] in participants with type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular risk factors, and moderate to severely impaired renal function.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of SHP647 in inducing remission, based on composite score of participant-reported symptoms and centrally read endoscopy, in participants with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC).
The primary objective of this study is to describe the efficacy of vilaprisan in subjects with uterine fibroids compared to ulipristal. The secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens of vilaprisan in subjects with uterine fibroids.