There are about 21062 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Italy. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Currently, 3 anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody products have received Emergency Use Authorizations from the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in non hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who are at high risk for progressing to severe disease and/or hospitalization (bamlanivimab plus etesevimab, sotrovimab, and casirivimab plus imdevimab). Differently from casirivimab/imdevimab and sotrovimab, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has never recommended authorising the combination bamlanivimab/etesevimab for treating COVID-19. Moreover, the evidence on sotrovimab relies on the interim analysis results of an ongoing randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial [1], unlike the combinations bamlanivimab/etesevimab and casirivimab/imdevimab, whose results of the randomised placebo-controlled trials were published after having completed the enrolment [2,3]. The study aims at assessing the non-inferiority of bamlanivimab plus etesevimab and sotrovimab vs. casirivimab plus imdevimab on COVID-19 progression in patients aged at least 50 years at an early stage of the disease. The progression of COVID-19 disease (hospitalization, need for supplementary oxygen therapy at home, death) within 14 days of randomisation is the composite outcome variable on which the calculation of the sample size is based. Based on available data regarding the reduction in the number of hospitalisations and medical visits with the use of casirivimab plus imdevimab at an early-stage of COVID-19, a disease progression of 5% has been estimated in the reference arm. 5% delta margin was considered clinically relevant, taking into account both the estimates of disease progression in the study population in absence of early treatment with monoclonal antibodies (20%, based on national data) and the efficacy of the reference standard. Therefore, 1260 participants will be randomly assigned in an equal ratio between the reference standard and each of the other two experimental arms (1:1:1). Randomization will be computer-generated in permuted blocks with a stratification based on site.
This study evaluates the safety, tolerability, PK, and preliminary efficacy of AZD0466 as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents in patients with advanced NHL
The present clinical study aims to compare, in the two groups of patients with acral ulcers, the reparative process of the injured area, the evaluation of the healing time (with "healing" interpreted as the complete re-epithelization of the wound) and the perception of pain through NRS scale.
This study will assess the safety and efficacy of Posoleucel for the treatment of adenovirus (AdV) infection in pediatric and adult allo-HCT recipients receiving standard of care (SoC).
The objective of this study was to determine the safety and therapeutic potential of BCX9930 in participants with C3G, IgAN, or PMN.
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of lumasiran on the percent change in urinary oxalate excretion in patients with recurrent calcium oxalate kidney stone disease.
This study is open to adults with liver cirrhosis and high blood pressure in the portal vein (main vessel going to the liver). The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called Avenciguat helps people with this condition. Participants are put into 3 groups randomly, which means by chance. Participants in 2 groups take different doses of Avenciguat as tablets twice a day. Participants in the placebo group take placebo as tablets twice a day. Placebo tablets look like Avenciguat tablets but do not contain any medicine. Participants are in the study for about 8 months. During this time, they visit the study site about 14 times. At 3 of the visits, the doctors check the pressure in a liver vein. This is done with a catheter (a long thin tube) and gives information about the pressure in the portal vein. The change in blood pressure is then compared between the groups to see whether the treatment works. The doctors also regularly check participants' health and take note of any unwanted effects.
This prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, single-blinded, open-label, single-arm, comparator study will enroll up to 100 eligible subjects from multiple sites undergoing LAAC procedure to evaluate the safety and performance of the KALPA™ mapping, imaging and navigation device in patients undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Closure (LAAC).
This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tolebrutinib compared with placebo in adult participants aged 18 to 85 years old with moderate-to-severe generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), who received Standard of Care (SoC). The double-blind (DB) treatment period of 26 weeks comprised of 7 site visits followed by a 2-year open label extension (OLE) period with quarterly visits. The efficacy of tolebrutinib versus placebo during the DB period was assessed by clinical evaluations, including scales based on physician examination or direct participant feedback i.e., patient reported outcomes (PROs). These evaluations continued during the OLE to measure long term efficacy and safety.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of guselkumab on coronary flow reserve (CFR), measured by transthoracic doppler-echocardiography, in participants with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and intermediate cardiovascular risk.