There are about 5618 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in India. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of the study is to Evaluate the Effect of Ticagrelor versus Placebo in Reducing the Rate of Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Paediatric Patients with Sickle Cell Disease
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of OMS721 on 24-hour urine protein excretion (UPE) in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) patients with high baseline proteinuria (high-risk proteinuria group; 24-hour UPE ≥ 2 g/day) assessed at 36 weeks from baseline.
Phase 3 study to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aztreonam- avibactam (ATM- AVI) versus best available therapy (BAT) in the treatment of hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), nosocomial pneumonia (NP) including hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), or bloodstream infections (BSI) due to metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)- producing Gram-negative bacteria.
The primary purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of rilpivirine (RPV)-based regimen in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infected, antiretroviral (ARV) treatment-naive participants, as determined by the percentage of virologic responders defined as having HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than 400 copies/ milliliter (mL) at Week 24.
Study will be conducted on patients receiving Whole brain(WB) / Partial Brain(PB) radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy at Department of Radiation Oncology, Fortis Memorial Research Insititute, Gurgaon, Haryana with end points. 1) Primary - To observe degree of alopecia at conclusion of radiotherapy compared to pre- radiotherapy status using scalp sparing radiotherapy technique. 2) Secondary 1)Recording the temporal dose levels causing radiation associated alopecia and dose range acceptable for reversible radiation-induced alopecia and determine dose volume threshold for the same 2)Recording of scalp doses by in vivo dosimetry and correlation with radiation induced alopecia Methods: Study includes 50 patients of partial / whole brain radiation therapy to be followed consecutively for radiation- induced alopecia. Contouring: For WB radiation entire scalp will be contoured. For PB irradiation contouring of partial scalp to be done by drawing 2-3 cm beyond the PTV edge in all directions. Planning: The treatment planning and delivery to be done as per existing practice in department. Contouring at Monaco / Brain Lab Contouring stations and planning on Monaco Treatment planning system (TPS) Version 5.11.01. Duration: 18 months for patient accrual; in this observational study patients undergoing radiation therapy to brain will be evaluated clinically and objectively for degree of alopecia. Photographic and Clinical record of four views of scalp- Right lateral, Left lateral, top and rear to be taken at intervals- a)Pre-Radiotherapy (RT) b) RT Conclusion c) First follow-up at 1 month. Hair loss quantified using Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score. Dosimetric measurements having subcomponents - measurement of surface dose uses optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters to be placed over scalp for first 5 fractions in case of conventional or fractionated SRT, for the entire duration of short course treatments and for first 5 fractions in case of palliative whole brain radiation given over 10 fractions. TPS measurements: Average, maximum dose and dose per unit volume will be reported for whole and partial scalp. Outcomes 1. Quantify the degree of alopecia at the conclusion of radiotherapy as compared to pre- radiotherapy status. 2. To record the radiation dose levels causing alopecia. 3. Obtain in vivo dosimetry values for scalp doses in modern radiotherapy treatment
Patients who have shown previous implantation failures, despite transferring good quality and chromosomally normal embryos (diagnosed by PGT-A), could have a displaced Window of Implantation (WOI) and consequently, alterations in their endometrial receptivity. The correction of this displacement can improve the results of the Assisted Reproduction Treatments (ART). The ERA test (Endometrial Receptivity Analysis) evaluates the transcriptomic endometrial profile to determine if the patient's uterus is receptive when the embryo is transferred during an In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) process, and identifies the personalized WOI of the patient. This process is called Personalized Embryo Transfer (pET). The Preimplantation Genetic Test of Aneuploidies or PGT-A (Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy), is currently carried out using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and serves to identify chromosomally normal embryos prior to their transfer in an IVF treatment. Aneuploidies are rarely compatible with life or can cause congenital diseases. So, the identification of chromosomally normal embryos, improves the success of reproduction in cases in which infertility is caused by such aneuploidies. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine, in a randomized and prospective way, the clinical benefit of adding the ERA test to the embryonic aneuploidies test for patients with a PGT-A indication.
Primary Objective: To demonstrate that efpeglenatide 4 and 6 mg was noninferior to placebo on 3-point major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) participants at high cardiovascular (CV) risk. Secondary Objectives: To demonstrate that efpeglenatide 4 and 6 mg was superior to placebo in T2DM participants with high CV risk on the following parameters: - 3-point MACE. - Expanded CV outcome. - Composite outcome of new or worsening nephropathy. To assess the safety and tolerability of efpeglenatide 4 and 6 mg, both added to standard of care in T2DM participants at high CV risk.
HCV infection is treated with oral drugs, termed as 'direct-acting anti-viral agents' (DAAs). In India, four DAAs are available (sofosbuvir [SOF], daclatasvir [DCV], ledipasvir [LDV] and velpatasvir [VEL]). Globally, DAA based regimens have obtained excellent rates of cure. Cure of HCV infection is defined as undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after stopping drugs, also referred to as sustained virological response at week 12 (SVR12). Using these DAA based treatment regimens, a small number (up to 5%) of people fail to achieve SVR12 and HCV RNA reappear after a few weeks of stopping the drugs (virological relapse). Data on management of virological relapse are extremely limited, especially in genotype 3, and no guidelines exist regarding re-treatment options for such group. Hence, we plan to re-treat such people using what appear to be the best combination treatment in each situation and to review our experience over time. Participants with chronic HCV infection who relapsed following standard DAA-based treatment regimen will be invited to participate. We propose to re-treat them with the anti-HCV drug combination which appears to be the most suited to his/her clinical profile, based on the current empiric knowledge - the choice of drugs will be based on HCV genotype, the previous treatment regimen and the presence/absence of liver cirrhosis, etc. During anti-HCV treatment, participants will be given expected standard of care and HCV RNA will be tested at 4-week intervals starting from week 4 and till RNA becomes undetectable, and then at the end of treatment and 12 weeks after the treatment was stopped - as is the usual practice during such treatment. Relevant clinical, laboratory and treatment details will be recorded in a pre-defined data collection form. Treatment outcome will be categorized as success (SVR12), treatment failure (any detectable HCV RNA at the end of 24 weeks treatment duration) or relapse (HCV RNA negative at the end of treatment, but positive at 12 weeks after stopping treatment). If possible, a 5-ml blood specimen will be collected before starting re-treatment from all participants; in addition, another similar specimen will be collected following the treatment in those in whom the re-treatment is unsuccessful. These will be stored and may be used in future for virological studies to look for drug-resistance variations.
The number of new cases of pancreatic cancer is 12.4 per 100,000 men and women per year. The number of deaths is 10.9 per 100,000 men and women per year. These rates are age-adjusted and based on 2009-2013 cases and deaths1. This cancer has a very poor prognosis and around 7.7% of these patients have a 5 years survival rate. Whipple procedure is the surgical treatment option for cancer pancreas, where the head of the pancreas, the gallbladder, part of the stomach, part of the small intestine, and the bile duct are removed.Those that undergoes this procedure, the 5 year survival rate increases to about 20%2. The duration of intensive care unit monitoring and hospital stay are longer than for most upper gastrointestinal surgeries. Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a major operation, carrying significant risk of morbidity and mortality with 30 - 60% complication rate3. The possibility of identifying patients at risk for postoperative complications and targeting them from surveillance and early treatment offers an opportunity to develop interventions that might significantly improve outcomes and efficiency. Gawande et al. developed and validated the surgical Apgar score (SAS) and demonstrated that SAS can be useful for rating the condition of patients after general or vascular surgery4. SAS is based on intraoperative blood loss, blood pressure, and heart rate3. The score is very simple and easy to calculate and can be available immediately after surgery. Several validation studies have reported that SAS is useful for predicting the risk of complications associated with various procedures4-10. We investigated this SAS could predict major postoperative complications among patients undergoing Whipples procedure in patients with pancreatic cancer.
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab compared with placebo as adjuvant therapy after definitive local therapy in patients with high-risk locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)