There are about 5241 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Hungary. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The study is intended to assess the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant combination of IPH5201 and durvalumab in addition to standard chemotherapy and adjuvant combination of IPH5201 and durvalumab in untreated patients with resectable, early-stage (stage II to IIIA) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
This study is designed to provide continued access to BCX9930 for subjects currently receiving treatment with BCX9930 in a BioCryst-sponsored clinical study for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) who, in the opinion of the investigator, would benefit from continued treatment with BCX9930 and who do not have access to other treatment options.
The main objective is to compare the efficacy of tarlatamab with standard of care (SOC) on prolonging overall survival (OS).
CKJX839D12302 is a pivotal Phase III study designed to test the hypothesis that treatment with inclisiran sodium 300 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (s.c.) administered on Day 1, Day 90, and every 6 months thereafter in patients at high cardiovascular (CV) risk without a prior major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) event will significantly reduce the risk of 4-Point-Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (4P-MACE) defined as a composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal ischemic stroke, and urgent coronary revascularization, compared to placebo.
The coprimary objectives of the study are to: - evaluate the efficacy of rocatinlimab in combination with topical corticosteroid and/or topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCS/TCI), compared with placebo in combination with TCS/TCI at Week 24, assessed using Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™). - evaluate the efficacy of rocatinlimab, in combination with TCS/TCI, compared with placebo in combination with TCS/TCI at Week 24, assessed using Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI).
The main purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of baricitinib for the treatment of severe or very severe alopecia areata (hair loss) in children from 6 years to less than 18 years of age. The study is divided into 4 periods, a 5-week Screening period, a 36-week Double-Blind Treatment Period, an approximately 2-year Long-term Extension Period, and a 4-week Post-treatment Follow-up period.
The main objective of the trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of trimodulin as adjunctive treatment to standard of care (SoC) compared to placebo plus SoC in adult hospitalized subjects with sCAP on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Other objectives are to determine detailed pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of trimodulin in a PK substudy and to determine its pharmacodynamic (PD) properties.
This study is to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of SC MK-3475A vs intravenous (IV) pembrolizumab, administered with chemotherapy in first line treatment of adult participants with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. The primary hypotheses of this study are MK-3475A subcutaneous (SC) is noninferior to pembrolizumab IV with respect to PK parameters.
A research study to investigate how quickly and to what extent different compositions of the study medicine ziltivekimab are absorbed, transported, and eliminated from the body. Ziltivekimab is not yet approved for market. The study medicine will be injected under the skin (this is called subcutaneous administration). Two different administration methods will be compared: a syringe and a pen-injector. A pen-injector is a device that is developed to make injections more easy and convenient. They are for example used by diabetes patients to inject insulin. It will also be investigated how safe ziltivekimab is and how well it is tolerated when it is used by healthy participants. Ziltivekimab has already been administered to patients with chronic kidney disease or rheumatoid arthritis. The current study will be the first study where ziltivekimab will be given to healthy participants.
Since its first clinical introduction by Alan Cribier in 2002, transcatheter aortic valve implantation has become the treatment of choice for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk and elderly patients. In such a population, cardiac surgery after TAVI is seldom performed (<1%), and only in cases of life-threatening complications such as device embolization, heart rupture, aortic dissection, endocarditis, etc. - State-of-the-art Nowadays, patients submitted to TAVI are getting younger, with lower surgical risk and longer life-expectancy, and their number is continuously increasing . As a consequence, the number of patients treated with TAVI who will require subsequent cardiac surgery will also expand, both acutely (due to the above-mentioned complications) and during follow-up (due to late endocarditis, valve degeneration and other non-aortic indications). - Previous informations Despite cardiac surgery after TAVI has been already performed several times across the world without documented issues in regard to aortic cross-clamp and aortotomy, it has been long debated whether the presence of TAVI devices with a tall stent frame in the ascending aorta may theoretically jeopardize the ability of surgeons to clamp and open the aorta. No specific data is yet available in regard to the existence and the incidence of such issue. - Ethical issues Not present. Aim of the study The aim of this study was to assess the anatomical feasibility of surgical aortic cross-clamp and aortotomy after TAVI based on post-TAVI computed tomographies (CT). Study design This study enrolled patients who underwent TAVI in three high-volume centers (San Raffaele University Hospital in Milan - Italy, Rigshospitalet Univeristy Hospital in Copenhagen - Denmark, Semmelweiss University in Budapest - Hungary) between October 2008 and May 2017. 117 CT acquired after TAVI procedures that were cardiac-gated and included the aortic arch into the field of view were retrospectively reviewed. 11 patients of San Raffaele Hospital will be involved. Reasons for post-TAVI acquisition were: participation into a clinical study with a previous Ethical Committee approval (91.4% n = 107); residual aortic regurgitation assessment for Valve-in-Valve evaluation (6.0% n = 7); TAVI complication assessment (ventricular septum defect 1.7% n = 2, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction 0.9% n = 1). Median time of CT acquisition after TAVI was 451 [290-780] days. As per study design, only TAVI devices with a long stent were assessed: CoreValve (Medtronic Inc., MN, USA) n = 82 (size 26 n = 23; size 29 n = 48; size 31 n = 11); CoreValve Evolut R (Medtronic Inc., MN, USA) n = 19 (size 23 n = 1; size 26 n = 7; size 29 n = 10; size 34 n = 1); Portico (Abbott, IL; USA) n = 16 (size 25 n = 9; size 27 n = 4; size 29 n = 3). Acurate Neo device (Boston Scientific, MA, USA, former Symetis) presents three stabilization arches in the ascending aorta which differ this prosthesis from the circular tubular stent of other self-expandable valves. To limit the introduction of possible confounding factors in the analysis, the investigators decided on purpose not to include the Acurate in the present study. Indication for TAVI respects international guidelines (EACTS 2017 Guidelines for Treatment of Valvular Heart Disease). A transthoracic examination is performed before the procedure at hospital admission. The in-hospital pathway pf examination is equal to every other patient treated in the participating centers.