There are about 25560 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Germany. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is a 52-week, Phase 3 multi-center, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of two dosing regimens of ligelizumab (240 mg and 120 mg) subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks (SCq4w) in participants with a medically confirmed diagnosis of IgE-mediated peanut allergy.
The primary objective of the study is to determine the efficacy of REGN1908-1909, as compared to placebo, to reduce allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis symptoms and allergy rescue medication use during natural cat exposure. The Secondary Objectives are: - To assess the reduction of allergic symptoms and use of allergy rescue medications after treatment with REGN1908-1909 versus placebo, as measured by the individual components of the CSMS - To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as measured by the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ[S]) - To determine the efficacy of REGN1908-1909, as compared to placebo, to inhibit a wheal-and-flare response to a skin prick test with cat allergen - To assess the durability of effect in allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis symptom and medication scores after multiple doses of REGN1908-1909 compared to placebo given every 12 weeks (Q12W) - To determine the efficacy following multiple doses of REGN1908-1909 compared to placebo at inhibiting a wheal-and-flare response to a skin prick test with cat allergen - To estimate the effect of REGN1908-1909 on lung function, as compared to placebo, in patients with asthma - To determine the efficacy of REGN1908-1909 as compared to placebo to reduce asthma symptoms in patients with asthma - To assess whether there is a difference in asthma rescue medication use in patients with asthma who are treated with REGN1908-1909 compared to placebo - To assess whether there is a difference in nighttime awakenings in patients with asthma treated with REGN1908-1909 compared to placebo - To evaluate the short-term and long-term safety and tolerability of REGN1908-1909, including the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions, local injection site reactions, and asthma exacerbations - To determine systemic exposure of total (free and antigen-bound) antibodies as measured by concentration of REGN1908 and REGN1909 - To assess the immunogenicity of REGN1908 and REGN1909
Randomized, multicenter, open-label, Phase 3 registration study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of milademetan compared to trabectedin in patients with unresectable (i.e., where resection is deemed to cause unacceptable morbidity or mortality) or metastatic DD liposarcoma that progressed on 1 or more prior systemic therapies, including at least 1 anthracycline-based therapy.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of rilematovir compared to placebo with respect to the time to resolution of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) symptoms.
The EPSILON study aims to comparatively evaluate the submucosal injection using ORISETM gel and glycerol during an ESD procedure in a specific population with superficial gastric and rectal (pre)neoplastic lesions.
Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is an inflammatory disease causing shoulder, hip, and neck pain and stiffness, in adults aged 50 years or older. This study evaluates how safe and effective ABBV-154 is in participants with glucocorticoid-dependent PMR. Adverse events and change in disease activity will be assessed. ABBV-154 is an investigational drug being evaluated for the treatment of PMR. Participants will be randomized into 1 of 4 treatment groups or arms, each arm receiving a different treatment. There is a 1 in 4 chance that a participant will be assigned to placebo. Around 160 participants, of at least 50 years of age, with PMR will be enrolled in the study at approximately 95 sites worldwide. The study is compromised of a 52 week double-blind, placebo-controlled period and a follow-up visit 70 days after the last dose of the study drug. All participants will receive a glucocorticoid taper along with the assigned dose of ABBV-154 or placebo, subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow). There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood tests, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.
A multicentre controlled phase II trial to compare the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab or alemtuzumab and autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (aHSCT). Active relapsing-remitting MS-Patients will be included and randomised to ocrelizumab or alemtuzumab versus aHSCT. Primary endpoint will be the time to treatment failure as assessed by failure of NEDA (no evidence of disease activity) as represented by: no expanded disability status scale (EDSS) progression, no relapse, no new T2 lesion and no Gd-enhancing lesion. This trial offers the opportunity to gain further information about efficacy and safety of all treatments and will give new insights into the immunology of highly active RRMS.
Patients with an intermediate risk (HFA-PEFF score 2-4 points) for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) will be further investigated with invasive right heart catheterization. All patients with a resting pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) <15mmHg will undergo the following stress test modalities in a randomized order: (1) bicycle ergometry, (2) dynamic handgrip exercise, (3) 500ml fluid challenge over 5 minutes, (4) leg raise testing. Exercise induced HFpEF will be diagnosed if PAWP rises to >25mmHg.
Due to different study designs, the sponsor separated Part C into this separate registration (NCT04958642), leaving Parts A/B in NCT02534844. The trial's final results for the primary outcome measure of Adverse Events (AE) will be reported here. This study is to evaluate how safe and effective adrabetadex is for participants with Niemann-Pick Type C1 (NPC1) disease who experience neurologic symptoms (listed under Keywords). In Parts A/B (NCT02534844), two out of every 3 participants will receive the study drug. The third participant will receive 1 to 2 small needle pricks at the location where the IT injection is normally made (sham control). In Part C, all participants will receive study drug.
This study is designed to describe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) participants in terms of their clinical characteristics, therapies used, disease progression, and outcomes (example, death, hospitalization, risk category for predicted mortality risk, and patient-reported outcomes [PROs]) in real-world clinical practice. This study will collect high-quality real-world data that may be used as a stand-alone dataset or in combination with other studies to address relevant research questions (example, serve as an external control dataset to another study) to support development and access to PAH therapies, as well as to contribute to the knowledge base of PAH through publications.