Clinical Trials Logo

Filter by:
NCT ID: NCT03984214 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting

Efficacy and Safety of Dronabinol in the Improvement of Chemotherapy-induced and Tumor-related Symptoms in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Start date: December 16, 2019
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Aim of this phase III trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of dronabinol (orally administered tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)) as adjuvant therapy to first-line standard chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer for improvement of chemotherapy- and tumor-related symptoms applicated by individual titration up to the maximum tolerated dose.

NCT ID: NCT03982394 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

Observational Study of Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

VALUE
Start date: July 1, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study will assess the use of risankizumab in adult patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis and compare risankizumab to other commonly used biologics.

NCT ID: NCT03976362 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Non-small-cell Lung

A Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) With or Without Maintenance Olaparib in First-line Metastatic Squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC, MK-7339-008/KEYLYNK-008)

Start date: June 28, 2019
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The current study will compare pembrolizumab (MK-3475) plus maintenance olaparib, vs. pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib placebo for the treatment of squamous NSCLC. The study's 2 primary hypotheses are: 1. Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib is superior to pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib placebo with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent clinical review (BICR). 2. Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib is superior to pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib placebo with respect to overall survival (OS). As of Amendment 07, there will be no further analyses for OS and patient-reported outcome assessments.

NCT ID: NCT03976323 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Carcinoma, Non-squamous Non-small-cell Lung

Study of Pembrolizumab With Maintenance Olaparib or Maintenance Pemetrexed in First-line (1L) Metastatic Non-squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (MK-7339-006, KEYLYNK-006)

Start date: June 28, 2019
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The current study will compare pembrolizumab (MK-3475) plus maintenance olaparib, vs pembrolizumab plus maintenance pemetrexed for the treatment of nonsquamous NSCLC. The study's 2 primary hypotheses are: 1. Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib is superior to pembrolizumab plus maintenance pemetrexed with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent clinical review (BICR) and 2. Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib is superior to pembrolizumab plus maintenance pemetrexed with respect to overall survival (OS).

NCT ID: NCT03952559 Active, not recruiting - Atopic Dermatitis Clinical Trials

A Study of Baricitinib (LY3009104) in Children and Adolescents With Atopic Dermatitis

BREEZE-AD-PEDS
Start date: May 24, 2019
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The reason for this study is to see if the study drug called baricitinib works and is safe in children and teenage participants with atopic dermatitis.

NCT ID: NCT03952039 Active, not recruiting - Myelofibrosis Clinical Trials

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Fedratinib Compared to Best Available Therapy in Subjects With DIPSS-intermediate or High-risk Primary Myelofibrosis, Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis, or Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis and Previously Treated With Ruxolitinib

FREEDOM2
Start date: September 16, 2019
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

A Phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fedratinib compared to best available therapy (BAT) in subjects with DIPSS (Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System)-intermediate or high-risk primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (post-PV MF), or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-ET MF) and previously treated with ruxolitinib. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the percentage of subjects with at least 35% spleen volume reduction in the fedratinib and the BAT arms.

NCT ID: NCT03948035 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Elotuzumab in Combination With Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (E-KRd) Versus KRd in MM

Start date: August 28, 2018
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Of the next-generation compounds, the monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) have recently attracted a lot of interest in MM. The anti-SLAMF7 directed moAb elotuzumab has completed phase III trials in MM patients. One phase III trial in MM patients with one to three prior lines of therapy compared elotuzumab-Rd with standard Rd. The triple combination was shown to significantly prolong PFS in this patient cohort with a greater proportion of patients in at least very good partial response (VGPR) when compared to subjects on Rd. Notably, the rate of infusion-related reactions with this specific moAb was very low, with an overall rate of 10% in premedicated patients and only 1% of Grade 3 severity. Grades 4/5 infusion-related reactions were absent and only 1% of patients on elotuzumab discontinued for infusion-related reactions. Of particular interest is the observation in this trial, that response and PFS were independent of cytogenetic high-risk features, i.e., deletion of chromosome 17p and translocation t(4;14). This effect distinguishes elotuzumab from most, if not all, other drug-based approaches. The investigators assume that incorporating the moAb into the KRd triple induction regimen should result in an even higher rate of deep (negative for MRD in conjunction with at least very good partial response [VGPR] as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG]) with these responses occurring independently of cytogenetic risk. Due to potential interference of elotuzumab with serum immune fixation, the investigators chose VGPR rather than complete response (CR) to exclude false-positive immunofixation results. Furthermore the investigators hypothesize that combining elotuzumab with lenalidomide should prolong PFS further.

NCT ID: NCT03946670 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

A Study of MBG453 in Combination With Hypomethylating Agents in Subjects With IPSS-R Intermediate, High or Very High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS).

STIMULUS-MDS1
Start date: June 4, 2019
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This Phase II is a multicenter, randomized, two-arm parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of MBG453 or placebo added to hypomethylating agents (azacitidine or decitabine) in adult subjects with IPSS-R intermediate, high or very high risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) not eligible for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) or intensive chemotherapy.

NCT ID: NCT03946449 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency

Study of Fazirsiran (TAK-999, ARO-AAT) in Patients With Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency Associated Liver Disease (AATD)

Start date: December 19, 2019
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the the safety and efficacy of the investigational product, fazirsiran (TAK-999, ARO-AAT), administered subcutaneously to patients with Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency.

NCT ID: NCT03945773 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Study of Cabozantinib as 2nd Line Treatment in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) With a Clear-Cell Component Who Progressed After 1st Line Treatment With Checkpoint Inhibitors

CaboPoint
Start date: January 8, 2020
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The overall objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib as 2nd line treatment in subjects with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic RCC with a clear-cell component, who progressed after prior Checkpoint Inhibitors (CPI) therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in combination or CPI combined with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy.