View clinical trials related to Coronary Stenosis.
Filter by:A multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study with clinical, quality of life, and economic evaluation to ascertain the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by patients with ischemic heart disease revascularized with Absorb in standard clinical practice in Spain. A before-after comparative analysis will be performed, so that each patient will act as his/her own control.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognosis of coronary stenosis based on intracoronary Imaging.
The investigators propose to develop a computational framework involving a novel automatic image segmentation algorithm based on CTA images, an artery model reconstruction algorithm for stenosis detection, and quantification of severity of stenosis in terms of area stenosis.
The study is to determine the long-term outcome of patients with coronary triple vessels disease (TVD) in the real world of China, by three different treatment strategies: percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or optimal medication therapy (OMT).
The bioresorbable polymer SYNERGY EES exhibits a favourable vascular healing profile in patients undergoing coronary intervention for de novo lesions. Specifically, the SYNERGY EES is superior to the ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold in terms of antirestenotic efficacy as assessed by angiography at 6-8 months.
Prospective, multicenter, single arm study, to assess the feasibility and safety of the Axetis Inert Stent for treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery stenosis in native vessels.
Intracranial atherosclerosis is common vascular lesion in Asian acute stroke patients and intracranial atherosclerosis patients have high rate of coronary artery disease (CAD). Moreover, several studies showed obvious association of CAD and cerebrovascular stenosis, which had been proved to increase the risk of stroke after coronary revascularization including coronary bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention. In addition, the efficacy and safety of combined coronary and cerebral intervention are not fully investigated. Hence, the aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of coronary and cerebrovascular arteriosclerosis as measured by combined coronary and cerebral angiography, explore the relationship between inflammation, atherosclerosis-related markers and coronary and cerebral atherosclerosis and compare the efficacy and safety of simultaneous or staged coronary and cerebral interventional strategy in Chinese Patients. The coronary angiography and cerebrovascular angiography are performed for all participants. The combined strategy for coronary and cerebrovascular angiography is carried out routinely in the investigators institutions. Simultaneous strategy is considered as that performed via the same access and within the same day. Staged strategy is intended as that performed within 7 days from the first procedure. The sequence of angiographies is established on an individual patient basis by the cardiovascular and neurointerventional team according to clinical symptoms of the patients and after coronary or cerebrovascular angiography. After combined coronary and cerebral angiography, simultaneous or staged interventional strategy will be performed in patients with severe coronary and cerebral stenosis. Blood sample is obtained from artery sheath when performing coronary or cerebral angiography. Lipid levels, inflammation and atherosclerosis-related markers will be measured in this study.
Register of treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in Andalucia (RETRATO).
The registry aims to evaluate the safety, performance and efficacy of the Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) system following rotational atherectomy in patients with complex de novo native coronary artery lesions in all-day clinical practice.
Whether to revascularize patients with angiographically-intermediate coronary lesions (AICL) is a major clinical issue. Intravascular techniques (assessing either the anatomy or the functional effect of coronary stenoses) are routinely used to better characterize coronary lesions. Among these,fractional flow reserve (FFR) provides validated functional insights while optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides high resolution anatomic imaging. Both techniques may be applied to guide decisions regarding the opportunity to revascularize patients with AICL and to optimize the result of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aim to compare the clinical and the economical impact of FFR versus OCT guidance in the percutaneous management of patients with AICL.